Again, you do not have a CLUE what you are talking about. An unborn is certainly a human being.
If you really are interested in what is, and isn't a human being, I suggest that you begin with this short bibliography of medical school textbooks. Turn to the page numbers given and you will see that they state explicitly that we are human beings from the time we are conceived.
KEITH L. MOORE & T.V.N. PERSAUD, THE DEVELOPING HUMAN page 14
SUSAN TUCKER BLACKBURN & DONNA LEE LOPER, MATERNAL, FETAL AND NEONATAL PHYSIOLOGY: A CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE page 49
MICHAEL R. HARRISON ET AL., THE UNBORN PATIENT: PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT page14
DALE RUSSELL DUNNIHOO, M.D., PH.D., FUNDAMENTALS OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS pages 286–99
Here are a few more just for fun.
"the proposition that an unborn child is a human being from conception is “supported by standard textbooks on embryology or human biology" T.W. SADLER, LANGMAN’S MEDICAL EMBRYOLOGY (John N. Gardner ed., 6th ed.
"Fertilization is an important landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new, genetically distinct human being is thereby formed... The zygote is a unicellular human being... Ronan R. O'Rahilly, Fabiola Muller, (New York: Wiley-Liss), 5, 55.EMBRYOLOGY & TERATOLOGY
"Every time a sperm cell and ovum unite a new human being is created which is alive and will continue to live unless its death is brought about by some specific condition."E.L. Potter and J.M. Craig, PATHOLOGY OF THE FETUS AND THE INFANT, 3d ed. (Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, vii. )
So now that you have been proven wrong, are you going to actually change your position or will you CONTINUE to say things that are simply untrue?