Yep. I think that most men that are pro-life are men. I also think that most have no idea the dangers involved in pregnancy or child-birth. I also don't think that the vast majority have even seen a child-birth. I would also say that I doubt that most are fathers... or that they consider what it is like to be a woman... lack of empathy, and all that.
It's been known to happen too that people get struck by lightning!
Or, hit by a car! How come you guys aren't getting all anal about cars still around?
You can choke too! Your rationale is absurd!
Lol. If you're prepared - then, you worry too much.
Worry about drivers who shouldn't be driving!
It's so likely to get maimed or die getting hit by them - so why not spend your time and energy fighting for something like that?
Like I said, there's nothing that says you have to rely on only one method of contraception.
Look at Covid - how many "contraceptions" are required to make it really safe for you?
Safe distancing, frequent washing of hands, wearing masks - you can even take it farther than that!
The least intelligent post today!
You seem to think all women are stupid ditzes unaware of how to use birth control. The fact is that only middle class and wealthy American women have access to the most effective birth control and the abortion rate of these women is very low. American conservatives have killed all bills providing subsidies that allow poor women to get effective contraceptives. Perhaps you could try and get your rather unattractive anti-women head around that fact.
I only support abortion prior to viability. I support a woman having control over her body no matter what.
Once they are pregnant though, they have a right to fight for their life. Just as your mother would have a right to fight the invader of her body, the coronavirus. And yes, you can claim self defense against a pathogen too. The invader, no matter what the invader is, is still what is putting the person's life in danger.
Nor do they get dragged to court for why they killed a fetus or someone in legitimate self defense because you don't get charged for defending your life.
www.uslawshield.com
No, they can't (except ironically when it comes to those in the military at that time who are in a position, place where the blood transfusion is necessary for military operations of some time, which I know because I saw it happen on the ship and even that can be challenged later). The government cannot compel me, as a current private citizen to donate bone marrow or blood to another citizen.
Nor do they get dragged to court for why they killed a fetus or someone in legitimate self defense because you don't get charged for defending your life.
If abortion was considered homicide, as some are trying to make it, then legally they can claim self defense. Since the assault on their body does not take place until after they are pregnant, then taking action to save their life, to decide how much risk they are willing to take when it comes to potential harm or death that ends a pregnancy (the source of the potential harm would involve self defense. Nowhere does the law say that self defense is only against human beings. Do you think someone can't claim self defense for killing say an endangered animal that is attacking them?
Legal Defense for Self Defense - USLawShield
Protect yourself with concealed carry insurance. Stay on the right side of the law. Be a responsible CCW gun owner.
Do you think a bear is a human being?
Because it is irrelevant. All that matters to my argument is whether a person can claim self defense against a fetus, as they could other living things (pretty sure no one claimed otherwise).
It's okay to kill a human being who is threatening your life. Their being "innocent" is not at all related to the threat they still pose to you. That is an attempt at presenting a moral argument or an appeal to emotion. It isn't an honest argument at all. It is a poster trying to manipulate others by using their "feelings" to make them feel guilty.