- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 21,775
- Reaction score
- 8,627
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I believe the word Jesus used is hypocrite...
How do you know that?
I believe the word Jesus used is hypocrite...
How do you know that?
It's in the Bible...Jesus, while on the earth, denounced the religious leaders of Israel as hypocrites and he also stated his reasons for doing so...they rendered mere lip service to the Creator, making the word of God invalid because of their traditions...Matthew 15:1, 6-9; Mark 7:6, 7...their actions were out of harmony with their words...Matthew 23:1-3...
How do you know that the people who wrote the Bible didn't lie about what Jesus said?
I’m pretty sure he means Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide Christians; those that that believe that the Bible is the only source of knowledge about God and that salvation is only through faith.
Why would you think that they had?
They were writing a book to promote a religion. Why wouldn't they?
Who wrote a book?
where can athesits and catholics find common ground?
How do you know that the people who wrote the Bible didn't lie about what Jesus said?
What does the Bible tell you — you share a book! Or do Jehovah's witnesses have their own bible like Mormons?
They have their own bible, custom made.
I liked the breaking of statues earlier, too. Notre Dame, why not? Isn't it full of pictures and paintings and statues? Burn it to the ground.I have given one example:
When they were sad at the sight of the "Notre Dame" fire.
Where-as those fanatical Bible Christians with no feeling for European culture were over-joyed at the sight of burning "idols".
So it is.
And those JW are masters of circular conclusions :lol:
I liked the breaking of statues earlier, too. Notre Dame, why not? Isn't it full of pictures and paintings and statues? Burn it to the ground.
They have their own bible, custom made.
I liked the breaking of statues earlier, too. Notre Dame, why not? Isn't it full of pictures and paintings and statues? Burn it to the ground.
My idea:
Atheists and Catholics can find some agreement.
But Bible Christians can never agree with Non-Bible-Christians.
Because anything outside their narrow world is satanic.
Correct?
I was just thinking about what "Bible Christians" could possibly mean, and it occurred to me that "Bible Christians" might be people who call themselves "Christian" but have no relationship with God - all they have is what they call their bible, if in fact it is a "Bible" - it might be a forgery. Here in America we call them "legalists" - they are always scripture bombing others to make themselves feel superior. Personally, I would rather be around people who live scripture rather than just quoting it. Nobody is perfect, but people who dont pretend to be perfect are easier to take.
Oh my God!
I am horrified about your posting.
I was just thinking about what "Bible Christians" could possibly mean, and it occurred to me that "Bible Christians" might be people who call themselves "Christian" but have no relationship with God - all they have is what they call their bible, if in fact it is a "Bible" - it might be a forgery. Here in America we call them "legalists" - they are always scripture bombing others to make themselves feel superior. Personally, I would rather be around people who live scripture rather than just quoting it. Nobody is perfect, but people who dont pretend to be perfect are easier to take.
Was that really necessary?
A Christian in name only...I believe the word Jesus used is hypocrite...
if you mean: "was it really necessary to call the beautiful cathedral of notre dame idolatry?"
then i say: "no!"
Yet Jesus answered oftentimes with "It is written"...if it was good enough for him, it is certainly good enough for me...too bad you disagree...