• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A summary of the Mueller investiagtion thus far.

I think it's entirely possible we will see that real investigation, but it won't be until Mueller has gone home. (hopefully in the next couple of months)

Awww, getting a warm lil "reaction" in your pants over your lunatic fantasy? Bad news for you, it's insane nonsense even you don't actually believe, but it helps with that gripping fear doesn't it?:2rofll:
 
I have only quoted both men.

Two men, with sources that could be different, gave "their" opinion of … an opinion. Doesn't mean either is lying; the difference could be chalked up to source, personalities, political leaning or whatever.

Hold on to your TDS (trump dream sickness; you have to be asleep to believe trump is completely innocent), you're going to need it.
 
If the answer is no one on the Mueller team is leaking info to Bernstein and others, then we can conclude that, for example, Bernstein's expose/book is hogwash unless Bernstein is clairvoyant.

There is a leaker in the Mueller investigation and you need to acknowledge it.

Certainly not because some Trump acolyte said so. Nonsense. There is zero evidence of that.

What we do know is that published reports hint that the information came from closed door congressional testimony and/or the transripts, thereof.

Your personal opinions and analyses are not relevant in this instance.
 
I suspect - in the end - after the Trump guilt is firmly and convincingly established - the line of excuse will be similar to that old Flip Wilson "the devil made me do it" joke but this time it will be we had to do these things because the Great Satan Hillary Clinton was going to win the White House and that simply could not be allowed to happen and any means necessary were justified.

I'm not so sure...the CLINTON! bit has been used up for the most part. They may need to fall back on Obama or some other meme.
 
There nothing contradictory about what Bernstein claims, and what Jon Karl claims to have heard, from sources unknown.

Bernstein claims part of the report is layout out how Trump has helped destabilize the U.S. in line with Russian goals.
It does not say he did it wittingly or unwittingly.

Jon Karl says he heard it from someone close the investigation, that there will be no bombshell (indictment of POTUS, smoking gun, etc?).

Those are entirely consistent.

Trump's actions...pushing Russia's agenda at the cost to the U.S., is a problem regardless of whether or not they found out why he's doing it
 
So...you are okay with a government official...against government rules and laws...leaking information about an ongoing investigation to the media for his own ulterior motives? And you are accusing Mueller of doing that?

Not much respect for the rule of law in your "get Trump" world, is there?

Why is it that you always twist the words of others to fit your own fabricated agenda? Is it just weak position or are you inherently dishonest?
 
I'm not so sure...the CLINTON! bit has been used up for the most part. They may need to fall back on Obama or some other meme.

yes - but in the end - when Trump is gone either through forced resignation or impeachment and conviction or just plain losing re-election and all the evidence is clear and convincing - the excuse will be that it all had to be done to stop Hillary Clinton.

She is the Great Satan that they were afraid of far far far more than Obama.
 
yes - but in the end - when Trump is gone either through forced resignation or impeachment and conviction or just plain losing re-election and all the evidence is clear and convincing - the excuse will be that it all had to be done to stop Hillary Clinton.

She is the Great Satan that they were afraid of far far far more than Obama.

Perhaps...but it is old and tired gibberish even if they are not bright enough to know it. Maybe they will switch to Pocohantas or 'Ol Joe eventually.
 
The summary shows that traitors that have tried to "get" President Trump have blown 20 million dollars and found nothing.
 
The summary shows that traitors that have tried to "get" President Trump have blown 20 million dollars and found nothing.

Damn, you can't even get that right.:roll:

Trump is about "got" won't make it to run again, and well Mueller has made a profit, so yeah, complete fail, but yeah, you support Trump. so unsurprising.
 
Two men, with sources that could be different, gave "their" opinion of … an opinion. Doesn't mean either is lying; the difference could be chalked up to source, personalities, political leaning or whatever.

Hold on to your TDS (trump dream sickness; you have to be asleep to believe trump is completely innocent), you're going to need it.

Two men reported what they were told.
 
Why is it that you always twist the words of others to fit your own fabricated agenda? Is it just weak position or are you inherently dishonest?

shrug...

I'm not the one wanting Mueller to break the law.
 
Why is it that you always twist the words of others to fit your own fabricated agenda? Is it just weak position or are you inherently dishonest?

Inherent dishonesty is THE MOST BASIC ESSENTAIL REQIREMENT, to support Trump. I mean you have to basically buy into the image portrayed by NBC's "The Apprentice" to take him seriously in the first place. Yeah these guys invented "alternative facts" and that guy, honesty and him have never been in the same zip code at the same time in many years!
 
Which means there's no reason not to make it public, yes?

If no crimez are uncovered, there's no reason to make it public.
 
Mueller ain't going to deliver ****e.. Hell, he himself needs to be investigated based on verifiable untoward behavior. I mean, Jesus how much material evidence of democratic operatives inside major US national security and law enforcement agencies does he need to indicted? Honestly, I think that this is what is taking him so long, he simply hasn't covered his tracks well enough yet. Once he feels comfortable, then he will deliver his precious report.


Tim-


Bashing a lifelong American patriot who has devoted his entire adult life to the defense of this nation, bleeding for our freedom, standing up for the rule of law, defending the Constitution, and sacrificing more for our country than likely many here combined, and for what? To defend a D-List New York City Liberal Conman? Ever considered a renewed look at your priorities? :usflag2:
 
If no crimez are uncovered, there's no reason to make it public.

How do you figure that? Wouldn't there be a slew of reasons not to make it public if crimes were committed? National security, national embarrassment, etc.?

I can't think of a single reason not to make an investigation public if nothing was found. In fact, in the current political climate, I would think it would be in the national interest to make it public if it proves that the President of the United States is innocent of any suspected crimes he was being investigated for. Do you disagree?
 
Of course their report is tainted by their opinion and disposition.

When someone say's, "I've been told __________.", that is not an opinion.
 
Thread: A summary of the Mueller investiagtion thus far.

https://www.npr.org/2018/12/09/6434...rge-so-far-from-robert-muellers-investigation

1) George Papadopoulos, former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, was arrested in July 2017 and pleaded guilty last October to making false statements to the FBI. He got a 14-day sentence.
2) Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chair, was indicted on a total of 25 different counts by Mueller’s team, related mainly to his past work for Ukrainian politicians and his finances. He had two trials scheduled, and the first ended in a conviction on eight counts of financial crimes. To avert the second trial, Manafort struck a plea deal with Mueller in September 2018 (though Mueller’s team said in November that he breached that agreement by lying to them).

3) Rick Gates, a former Trump campaign aide and Manafort’s longtime junior business partner, was indicted on similar charges to Manafort. But in February he agreed to a plea deal with Mueller’s team, pleading guilty to just one false statements charge and one conspiracy charge.
4) Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, pleaded guilty last December to making false statements to the FBI.
5-20) 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies were indicted on conspiracy charges, with some also being accused of identity theft. The charges related to a Russian propaganda effort designed to interfere with the 2016 campaign. The companies involved are the Internet Research Agency, often described as a “Russian troll farm,” and two other companies that helped finance it. The Russian nationals indicted include 12 of the agency’s employees and its alleged financier, Yevgeny Prigozhin.
21) Richard Pinedo: This California man pleaded guilty to an identity theft charge in connection with the Russian indictments, and has agreed to cooperate with Mueller. He was sentenced to 6 months in prison and 6 months of home detention in October.
22) Alex van der Zwaan: This London lawyer pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI about his contacts with Rick Gates and another unnamed person based in Ukraine. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail and has completed his sentence.
23) Konstantin Kilimnik: This longtime business associate of Manafort and Gates, who’s currently based in Russia, was charged alongside Manafort with attempting to obstruct justice by tampering with witnesses in Manafort’s pending case this year.
24-35) 12 Russian GRU officers: These officers of Russia’s military intelligence service were charged with crimes related to the hacking and leaking of leading Democrats’ emails in 2016.
36) Michael Cohen: In August, Trump’s former lawyer pleaded guilty to 8 counts — tax and bank charges, related to his finances and taxi business, and campaign finance violations — related to hush money payments to women who alleged affairs with Donald Trump, as part of a separate investigation in New York (that Mueller had handed off). But in November, he made a plea deal with Mueller too, for lying to Congress about efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Move along... nothing to see here...

Thanks for the summary. Wonder how the numbers stack up against the Watergate crew.
 
When someone say's, "I've been told __________.", that is not an opinion.

So, what’s your point, they disagree so their both wrong?
 
So, what’s your point, they disagree so their both wrong?

Or one is right and one is wrong.

It doesn't really matter, does it? To me, they are both just guys spreading rumors based on unnamed sources. Nothing different than all the other rumors we keep hearing.
 
Good question....distraction wont work here. I just hope Uncle Donny does not get desperate and start a war.

Start a war? The guy has been denounced for announcing he wants to END a pair of wars.
It would be nice if a lot of the anti-Trumpers would be at least coherent in their criticism of the administration.
 
Back
Top Bottom