• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A summary of the Mueller investiagtion thus far.

So far, none of them have anything to do with "collusion".

That's the key for you, isn't it? As long as there is no collusion, anything else the president may be guilty of is irrelevant.

So, if Mueller came across money laundering or banking crimes, you think Mueller should ignore that. It's not collusion. And besides, collusion's not a crime, right?
 
I think it's entirely possible we will see that real investigation, but it won't be until Mueller has gone home. (hopefully in the next couple of months)

The phony reasons that were used to commence the Mueller investigation is an ample enough precedent to beginning a special counsel on the leaking of Mueller information.
 
That's the key for you, isn't it? As long as there is no collusion, anything else the president may be guilty of is irrelevant.

So, if Mueller came across money laundering or banking crimes, you think Mueller should ignore that. It's not collusion. And besides, collusion's not a crime, right?
The mandate given to Mueller by Rosenstein was to find Trump campaign influence with Russia in the 2016 election.

That mandate was too narrow. The mandate should have included anyone who, with Russia, tried to influence the 2016 election. Then Hillary's campaign should've been investigated. Matter of fact, Rosenstein's mandate should have included anyone who attempted to influence the 2016 election then the MSM should have been included in the Mueller investigation

NONE of the charges by the Mueller team of 2016 Trump campaign officials have to do with Trump campaign influence with Russia in the 2016 election. NONE.

You guys are sticklers to the mandate given to Mueller by Rosenstein in this investigation only when it benefits you. For example, when someone (like me) points out there were entities who were verifiably together with Russians to influence the 2016 election (like Hillary's campaign) you mention that wasn't part of the mandate given to Mueller by Rosenstein.

If this is your thinking, that Mueller should only investigate Trump campaign officials who, with Russia, attempted to influence the 2016 election because this is Rosenstein's mandate, why do you accept Mueller's investigation of Russians who weren't together with the Trump campaign to influence the 2016 election?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom