- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,114
- Reaction score
- 33,461
- Location
- SE Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You just did exactly what I pointed out was invalid logic: use different source for different definitions rather than the same source for both. That's called "cherry picking" and it is invalid logic. Your argument has no merit because of it.
You didn't even use a dictionary for one of the definitions, but instead used a court case as though that's not an utterly asinine way to get a definition for a word.
Seriously, your argument can only have the effect of increasing people's ignorance.
Well I invalidate your logic, whatever it is. :mrgreen: