• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

57% of American households paid no income tax last year, study shows

Yep, and that would increase popular support for raising the federal income tax (FIT) rates on those (few) who still pay FIT in order to fund more income redistribution programs.

More redistribution of govt controlled wealth to the rich and large corps as done by the Trump/Rep/con tax plan. No matter how few but the rich get taxed at whatever the FIT rate may be, the overall tax system benefits the rich and large corps. FIT rates are meaningless.
 
-snip-

You may be unintentionally getting pulled off-course by the unexamined assumption that wealth is zero sum.

Honestly, I don't follow either, beyond laughing whenever I see that Musk is tweeting about how his own company is overvalued.



Regulatory regimes overwhelmingly tend to favor entrenched interests, who are able to guarantee market share and suppress competition, including large institutional investors, sure.


However, none of this is an actual response to the point that:

More redistribution of govt controlled wealth to the rich and large corps as done by the Trump/Rep/con tax plan. No matter how few but the rich get taxed at whatever the FIT rate may be, the overall tax system benefits the rich and large corps. FIT rates are meaningless.
I proceed on the assumption much more money is invested in anti government, anti taxation messaging, "you're exhibiting wealth envy," and "wealth is not a zero sum game," than is invested in counter arguments so I tend to look for experts in tax strategy and experts in other fields than wealth management and tax strategy who apply their expertise to what I view as one of the top 2 or 3 U.S. societal challenges, wealth concentration trend in a climate of rising sovereign debt.

In Memory of Edward D. Kleinbard - American Bar Association​

https://www.americanbar.org › abataxtimes_home › 20...

Aug 24, 2020 — Edward D. Kleinbard, one of America's greatest lawyers in tax or any other field, died on June 28, 2020. He was 68 years old, and the cause ...

By Jesse Drucker
Updated July 14, 2020
"...he used his insider’s expertise to show in particular how multinational companies avoid taxes.

Mr. Kleinbard published a series of articles on the inequities in the tax system, especially how multinational corporations like Google, using techniques nicknamed “Double Irish” and “Dutch Sandwich,” dodged billions of dollars in taxes by pushing profits into tax havens offshore.
He coined the term “stateless income” and titled an article on Starbucks’s tax avoidance “Through a Latte Darkly.”
In 2013, after a Senate investigation into Apple’s offshore tax strategy, Mr. Kleinbard summarized the company’s aggressive moves this way: “There is a technical term economists like to use for behavior like this. Unbelievable chutzpah.”
He became a regular contributor to The New York Times in its online Op-Ed feature “Room for Debate,” and in 2014 he published his first book, “We Are Better Than This,” which explored how tax policy could be used to solve the country’s surging inequality.

Most tax policy discussions were “backward,” he contended. Policymakers should identify their spending priorities — ideally to invest in the country’s citizens — and then discuss the proper tax policies to pay for them.
“The starting point in every case,” he wrote, “should not be determined by establishing an arbitrarily small amount of tax to collect and then treating government like an institutional Procrustes, whose only responsibility it is to amputate the welfare of our fellow citizens to suit that amount.”
....
Mr. Kleinbard submitted the manuscript for a book to his publisher the day before he went into the hospital for surgery in March, said Leslie Samuels, a senior counsel at Cleary Gottlieb who had worked with Mr. Kleinbard there. The book, titled “What’s Luck Got to Do With It?,” explores the role luck plays — whether through inherited wealth, geography or racial heritage — in worsening inequality. Mr. Samuels recalled how Mr. Kleinbard would roll his eyes at how many of his wealthy clients were oblivious to their good fortune. He recalled Mr. Kleinbard saying: “They’re not so smart — they are just lucky. I was lucky."





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...ial-thought/&usg=AOvVaw0po_BqT3WA_fd0GpoBfqgl
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...ial-thought/&usg=AOvVaw0po_BqT3WA_fd0GpoBfqgl
 
They paid taxes, just not federal income taxes. I also find these kinds of studies or claims spurious. When you have taxes taken out of your paycheck, as everyone does, you're paying taxes. Yes, some are getting rebates/refunds that exceeds their taxes paid, but it's also likely that they have less disposable income.
huh? you refuted yourself in 2 sentences. If you have 100 withheld ( which is not 'paying taxes') and at the year have a tax liability of 100, you will get the withheld money all back. You have paid NO taxes.
 
More redistribution of govt controlled wealth to the rich and large corps as done by the Trump/Rep/con tax plan. No matter how few but the rich get taxed at whatever the FIT rate may be, the overall tax system benefits the rich and large corps. FIT rates are meaningless.
if the ' rich ' paid 0 taxes ,you would have a point. But when you look at any legitimate analysis, the top tiers pay all the taxes.If you statement were true, this would not be the case. But it's not and you don't. If you want the top tiers to pay even more, just say so, but don't try to sling the tired old uninnformed lw class warrior agitprop about 'fair share' and 'inequality'.
 
A recent analysis from the nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center estimated that 57% of Americans paid no taxes last year. While that's down slightly from last year's 60%, it marks a significant increase from the 44% recorded before the pandemic began.

Because the stimulus checks were designed as refundable tax credits, they significantly reduced tax liability in both 2020 and 2021, the analysis said. And in some cases, the checks flipped some households from paying income tax to not doing so.

Essentially, no household making less than $28,000 paid federal income tax last year, nor will a majority – about 75% – of those making between $28,000 and $55,000. Among middle-income households, about 43% paid no federal income tax.

Still, while many households did not pay federal income tax, most Americans still owed payroll or state income taxes. The study shows that about four out of five individuals paid at least one of these taxes. Nearly everyone paid the government in another form, whether through state and local sales taxes, excise taxes, property taxes or state income taxes.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/phot...chts-belong-013747479.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

Fox Business News often surprises me by telling the truth.

That's because 57 percent of the working people aren't making enough money to BE IN a high enough bracket where they owe.
Is that their fault? Personally, I don't think so.
 
huh? you refuted yourself in 2 sentences. If you have 100 withheld ( which is not 'paying taxes') and at the year have a tax liability of 100, you will get the withheld money all back. You have paid NO taxes.

They may not pay federal *income* taxes; they still pay things like payroll, state, and other taxes. According to at least one credible estimate, the bottom income earners pay up to 20% of their income in taxes - it might not be federal income taxes but taxes of one kind or another. Obviously, that's going to vary from one individual to the next but it's also pretty obvious that this canard that the poor don't pay any taxes is nonsense.
 
Once the Poor have to start paying for the insanity of our (DEMS) Politicians, only then will they stop voting for these insane criminals !
https://usdebtclock.org/
 
if the ' rich ' paid 0 taxes ,you would have a point. But when you look at any legitimate analysis, the top tiers pay all the taxes.If you statement were true, this would not be the case. But it's not and you don't. If you want the top tiers to pay even more, just say so, but don't try to sling the tired old uninnformed lw class warrior agitprop about 'fair share' and 'inequality'.
Uhhhh.... what would you prefer the bottom 165,500,000 give up to relieve the "tax burden" you believe is "unfair" to the wealthiest?
Shoes, toilet paper, or a roof over their heads? You cannot squeeze blood from a stone.


51987126987_3d6d4a1cc1_z.jpg


October 19, 2021
A new report from CNBC reveals that the wealthiest 10% of Americans now own the majority of U.S. stocks — a staggering 89%.

"...however, corporate tax cuts are permanent. "

Back in 2019, when the wealthiest one percent only owned....

"Net Worth of the 10%, 1%, and .1% Households​

Percentile Threshold10%2%1%0.10%
Net Worth$1,219,126$6,557,023$11,099,166$43,207,732
Looking at the one percent by net worth is more useful than income. If we had our way, a view of the top 10%, 1%, and .1% would concentrate on accumulated wealth, not affluence.

This data comes from the 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances from the Federal Reserve. (This is the newest SCF data until likely 2023). We calculated these breakpoints for our American wealth and net worth percentiles article. ..."

50246828886_4a46bd58a9_n.jpg


50246183043_9d5fd10e4e_n.jpg
 
Once the Poor have to start paying for the insanity of our (DEMS) Politicians, only then will they stop voting for these insane criminals !
https://usdebtclock.org/

Where do you get "this stuff"? (the RWE arguments opposing the factual record)

The republican newspaper of New Hampshire :

Our choice is Joe Biden* | Editorials | unionleader.com

https://www.unionleader.com › opinion › our-choice-is-jo...
Oct 25, 2020 — "The Union Leader was very quickly dismissed by then-candidate Trump after we failed to bestow on him our endorsement in the Republican primary ... ..
Since Trump took over, the national debt has exploded by more than 7 TRILLION dollars. While the last several trillion was in response to the COVID-19 economic crisis, at least the first three trillion was on the books well before the pandemic, while Trump was presiding over “...the best economy we’ve ever had in the history of our country.” (Trump’s words.)
The layman would expect that the best economy in history would be a time to get the fiscal house in order, pay down debt and prepare for a rainy day (or perhaps a worldwide pandemic). .."


50256710848_72c62a2440_b.jpg


50256711718_ea1b46ec01_b.jpg

Final Obama admin. budget year ends with borrowing averaging $56 billion per month.

Government - Debt to the Penny (Daily History Search Application)
50257398291_11fa3d96a7_b.jpg

10/01/2017 - 02/26/2020, = 29 prepandemic months / $3,181,000,000,000, debt increase averaging $109 billion borrowed per month,
during the Trump described economy, “...the best economy we’ve ever had in the history of our country.” (Trump’s words.)

What happened to "the job creators" who G.O.P. claimed would "repatriot all of those profits sitting idle overseas and invest them in the
U.S. workers," if only the wealthiest stockholders were given a permanent tax cut on corporations from a maximum of 35 percent to 22 percent?

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 - Wikipedia

"...however, corporate tax cuts are permanent. "

Trump slams companies for using U.S. tax credit to buy back ...

https://www.reuters.com › article › trump-slams-compa...
Mar 20, 2020 — “I am fine with restricting buybacks,” Trump added. “In fact, I would demand that there be no stock buybacks.

The Trump administration's 180 on stock buybacks - Axios

https://www.axios.com › Economy & Business
Mar 19, 2020 — President Trump told reporters on Thursday he would be "OK" with a conditional coronavirus bailout that bans stock buybacks for companies ..

S&P 500 share buybacks could reach $1 trillion in 2019 on ...​

https://www.spglobal.com › latest-news-headlines › s-p-...

Mar 26, 2019 — , surpassing 2018's record $800 billion, as strong cash positions allow ...

Stock Buybacks: Is Excess Cash Being Spent Wisely? - JP ...​

https://www.jpmorgan.com › insights › research › stock...



Aug 15, 2019 — But companies actually increased investment in capital expenditure (capex) by 16% (or $99 billion) and boosted dividends by 9% ($38 billion) ...




 
Last edited:
if the ' rich ' paid 0 taxes ,you would have a point. But when you look at any legitimate analysis, the top tiers pay all the taxes.If you statement were true, this would not be the case. But it's not and you don't. If you want the top tiers to pay even more, just say so, but don't try to sling the tired old uninnformed lw class warrior agitprop about 'fair share' and 'inequality'.

My point is valid. The top tiers pay "all" (most) of the taxes because they make "all" (most) of the money. The lower tiers aren't paid enough to pay much at all in FIT. But most of the wealth being accumulated is not by income that is taxed by FIT rates, nor necessarily is all that income taxed. A great deal of wealth is accumulated by capital gains, from such as stock holdings, that are taxed at much lower rates, especially long-term capital gains. The highest earners make much more from stock options than straight salary. Even the FIT structure is not wholly progressive because as income rises beyond a certain level, the tax rate does not rise, progress, with the increase in income. It's capped. Plus, there is no minimum tax. There are enough ways of getting around paying a given tax rate, loopholes, that allow high income earners, incl huge corps, to pay rather low effective tax rates.

It is you who are uninformed. Which is difficult to believe considering these facts have been posted, published and in the media ad infinitum.
 
Uhhhh.... what would you prefer the bottom 165,500,000 give up to relieve the "tax burden" you believe is "unfair" to the wealthiest?
Shoes, toilet paper, or a roof over their heads? You cannot squeeze blood from a stone.
You are arguing against positions I don't have. I fully support a progressive tax system where the higher quintiles pay more.This is what we have now.
My position is that if Dems want to tax the rich- just do it but be honest about it. Don't make divisive dishonest statements that ' we just want them to pay their fair share.
 
My point is valid. T
My point is valid. The top tiers pay "all" (most) of the taxes because they make "all" (most) of the money. The lower tiers aren't paid enough to pay much at all in FIT. But most of the wealth being accumulated is not by income that is taxed by FIT rates, nor necessarily is all that income taxed. A great deal of wealth is accumulated by capital gains, from such as stock holdings, that are taxed at much lower rates, especially long-term capital gains. The highest earners make much more from stock options than straight salary. Even the FIT structure is not wholly progressive because as income rises beyond a certain level, the tax rate does not rise, progress, with the increase in income. It's capped. Plus, there is no minimum tax. There are enough ways of getting around paying a given tax rate, loopholes, that allow high income earners, incl huge corps, to pay rather low effective tax rates.

It is you who are uninformed. Which is difficult to believe considering these facts have been posted, published and in the media ad infinitum.

he top tiers pay "all" (most) of the taxes because they make "all" (most) of the money. The lower tiers aren't paid enough to pay much at all in FIT. But most of the wealth being accumulated is not by income that is taxed by FIT rates, nor necessarily is all that income taxed. A great deal of wealth is accumulated by capital gains, from such as stock holdings, that are taxed at much lower rates, especially long-term capital gains. The highest earners make much more from stock options than straight salary. Even the FIT structure is not wholly progressive because as income rises beyond a certain level, the tax rate does not rise, progress, with the increase in income. It's capped. Plus, there is no minimum tax. There are enough ways of getting around paying a given tax rate, loopholes, that allow high income earners, incl huge corps, to pay rather low effective tax rates.

It is you who are uninformed. Which is difficult to believe considering these facts have been posted, published and in the media ad infinitum.
lw rhetoric.
I repeat: "If you want the top tiers to pay even more, just say so, but don't try to sling the tired old uninformed lw class warrior agitprop about 'fair share' and 'inequality'.
 
You are arguing against positions I don't have. I fully support a progressive tax system where the higher quintiles pay more.This is what we have now.
My position is that if Dems want to tax the rich- just do it but be honest about it. Don't make divisive dishonest statements that ' we just want them to pay their fair share.

How is that divisive? If working class W-2 wage earners are paying 20% in income taxes and Brett Billionaire is paying 5% in income taxes because he has accounts who can write off his "losses"...that's a case of someone not paying their fair share.

The problem is there are effectively two separate tax codes, which is not really a new problem, but it's a festering problem that continues to get worse as people with illiquid assets find ways to grow their wealth while the 'suckers' pay a greater share of their income in taxes.
 
How is that divisive? I.
It's just spinning stats to make it seem like rich people are getting away with something at the 'little' guy's expense.
If you want to raise taxes just be honest. " The Government needs money and rich people have it'.
As the OP asserts, 57 % are getting the ultimate tax break- paying a tax rate of ZERO . You can't get a better rate than that.
 
It's just spinning stats to make it seem like rich people are getting away with something at the 'little' guy's expense.
If you want to raise taxes just be honest. " The Government needs money and rich people have it'.
As the OP asserts, 57 % are getting the ultimate tax break- paying a tax rate of ZERO . You can't get a better rate than that.
Fine! Now let's talk about "woke democrats" CRT, puberty blockers, "don't say gay in K-12"!

New report finds wealthiest 10% of Americans own majority of U.S. stocks

The report from CNBC highlights the continued inequality in the stock market.
www.wbur.org
October 19, 2021
A new report from CNBC reveals that the wealthiest 10% of Americans now own the majority of U.S. stocks — a staggering 89%.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 - Wikipedia

"...however, corporate tax cuts are permanent. "


Super-Rich Americans Feel Relief as Tax Hikes Are Canceled ...

https://www.bloomberg.com › news › articles › super-ri...
Dec 20, 2021 — Democrats had designed a $1.75 trillion bill aimed at narrowing the widening wealth gap by enhancing tax credits for children and low-income ...

The "T" is trillion, the bottom 50 are 165,500,000 residents, the top 1% are 3,300,0000,

1650390449964.png


50246828886_4a46bd58a9_n.jpg



50246183043_9d5fd10e4e_n.jpg
 
And its disgraceful that 58% of the country make so little while we have billionaires buying cruise ships as their personal yachts and we have millions of scumbags who defend these greedy ****er.

Of course the right loser will focus on lack of income tax and not the paltry salary these people make that they can't even get by on
 
Fine! Now let's talk about "woke democrats" CRT, puberty blockers, "don't say gay in K-12"!

New report finds wealthiest 10% of Americans own majority of U.S. stocks

The report from CNBC highlights the continued inequality in the stock market.
www.wbur.org
October 19, 2021
A new report from CNBC reveals that the wealthiest 10% of Americans now own the majority of U.S. stocks — a staggering 89%.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 - Wikipedia

"...however, corporate tax cuts are permanent. "


Super-Rich Americans Feel Relief as Tax Hikes Are Canceled ...

https://www.bloomberg.com › news › articles › super-ri...
Dec 20, 2021 — Democrats had designed a $1.75 trillion bill aimed at narrowing the widening wealth gap by enhancing tax credits for children and low-income ...

The "T" is trillion, the bottom 50 are 165,500,000 residents, the top 1% are 3,300,0000,

View attachment 67386395


50246828886_4a46bd58a9_n.jpg



50246183043_9d5fd10e4e_n.jpg
More charts! zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 
More charts! zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Versus posting opinions identical to those hyper invested in by wealthiest G.O.P. donors, the ones who have purchased the most
influence (control) while intensely promoting the claim they are the victims.

Five consecutive, white Roman Catholic SCOTUS judicial nominees by two POTUS who did not win the popular vote to get into
the white house.

Peltz hosted Manchin for fundraiser featuring ... - CNBC

https://www.cnbc.com › 2022/04/18 › nelson-peltz-host...
1 day ago — Billionaire and Wall Street veteran Nelson Peltz hosted a fundraiser for conservative Democrat Joe Manchin at his massive Florida estate ...


Joe Manchin Hobnobbed With Republican Donors at Fundraiser

https://www.rollingstone.com › politics › politics-news
20 hours ago — Billionaire Republican benefactor Nelson Peltz hosted a $5,000-a-plate bash for the centrist Democrat last month, CNBC reported on Monday.

The donors pay for a protection scheme that hobbled IRS enforcement through lies about discrimination against "conservative non-profits".
Any legislation they don't like is nullified by the SCOTUS they constructed. A senator of the poorest state blocked all efforts in this congress to
increase their taxes....

Super-Rich Americans Feel Relief as Tax Hikes Are Canceled ...

https://www.bloomberg.com › news › articles › super-ri...
Dec 20, 2021 — Democrats had designed a $1.75 trillion bill aimed at narrowing the widening wealth gap by enhancing tax credits for children and low-income ...



 
Versus posting opinions identical to those hyper invested in by wealthiest G.O.P. donors, the ones who have purchased the most
influence (control) while intensely promoting the claim they are the victims.

Five consecutive, white Roman Catholic SCOTUS judicial nominees by two POTUS who did not win the popular vote to get into
the white house.

Peltz hosted Manchin for fundraiser featuring ... - CNBC

https://www.cnbc.com › 2022/04/18 › nelson-peltz-host...
1 day ago — Billionaire and Wall Street veteran Nelson Peltz hosted a fundraiser for conservative Democrat Joe Manchin at his massive Florida estate ...


Joe Manchin Hobnobbed With Republican Donors at Fundraiser

https://www.rollingstone.com › politics › politics-news
20 hours ago — Billionaire Republican benefactor Nelson Peltz hosted a $5,000-a-plate bash for the centrist Democrat last month, CNBC reported on Monday.

The donors pay for a protection scheme that hobbled IRS enforcement through lies about discrimination against "conservative non-profits".
Any legislation they don't like is nullified by the SCOTUS they constructed. A senator of the poorest state blocked all efforts in this congress to
increase their taxes....

Super-Rich Americans Feel Relief as Tax Hikes Are Canceled ...

https://www.bloomberg.com › news › articles › super-ri...
Dec 20, 2021 — Democrats had designed a $1.75 trillion bill aimed at narrowing the widening wealth gap by enhancing tax credits for children and low-income ...




… hey didn’t i see you yelling from a bullhorn standing on a milk crate in front of penn statuon? #workers of the world unite!!Laffriot!
 
The claim is "57% of Americans paid no taxes last year". If they are referring to income taxes, then it's false.
Only because the wording was done poorly.

The 57% is the net results. Most of that 57% likly did pay federal income tax. However, when they filed taxes, they got it back, and some of them, even more if claiming earned income credit and/or child tax credits.

We are in a dangerous part when the majority votes to legally steal the productive earnings.
 
Last edited:
Only because the wording was done poorly.

The 57% is the net results. Most of that 57% likly did pay federal income tax. However, when they filed taxes, they got it back, and some of them, even more if claiming earned income credit and/or child tax credits.

We are in a dangerous part when the majority votes to legally steal the productive earnings.
Should we all just lie down in reaction to you putting your indoctrination on display, in your post?

...when the wealthiest RWE write and arrange to pass their own tax relief legislation and install two consecutive G.O.P. POTUS in the white house who nominate five consecutive white Roman Catholics to SCOTUS seats, all from a list of and shepherded through the Senate confirmation process by this "scion of the community", a longtime V.P. of this openly corrupt, RWE "lawyers' lobby".

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/epa-chief-scott-pruitt-tapped-aide-donors-to-help-wife-land-job-at-conservative-group/2018/06/13/f54c87fa-6db1-11e8-afd5-778aca903bbe_story.html
June 13, 2018
"...
The job hunt included Pruitt’s approaching wealthy party supporters and conservative figures with ties to the Trump administration. The individuals said he enlisted Samantha Dravis, then serving as associate administrator for the EPA’s Office of Policy, to line up work for his wife.
And when one donor, Doug Deason, said he could not hire Marlyn Pruitt because of a conflict of interest, Pruitt continued to solicit his help in trying to find other possibilities.



A spokesman for the Judicial Crisis Network confirmed Tuesday that it employed the onetime school nurse “temporarily as an independent contractor,” but it did not disclose via email how long she worked there or what she was paid. The spokesman said the position came about after the group received her résumé from Leonard Leo, executive vice president of the Federalist Society. The two organizations have financial ties.

Leo is a prominent Pruitt backer and longtime friend who was involved in arrangements for the administrator’s visit to Italy last year. Taxpayers spent more than $100,000 on the trip, which included private tours of the Vatican and meals at some of Rome’s finest restaurants. .."

The racist volk who have placed five consecutive white Roman Catholics on "The Court" invite the most corrupt, unindicted former
G.O.P. cabinet member in U.S. history to reinvent himself on their turf and claim it is no reflection on them?

Oklahoma City Chapter Lunch with Former Administrator Scott ...

Feb 3, 2022Scott Pruitt,
52015012182_f012895811_z.jpg

A Guide to the Eighteen Federal Investigations Faced by ...

https://capaction.medium.com › a-guide-to-the-sixteen-...
May 17, 2018 — Scott Pruitt resigned as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency effective July 6, 2018. He was only in office for 500 days, ...
 
Last edited:
I don't know if I want to respond to this thread, but here goes. It should be 100% of all American workers paying no Income tax. Make the income tax illegal. No state nor the feds should be allowed to tax income. You want to be Captain America? Fine, do it without taxing income so that all people can choose what they agree with and not. Once you tax income, you are telling people they have to be subjugated to bad rules and a system that doesn't care.
 
I don't know if I want to respond to this thread, but here goes. It should be 100% of all American workers paying no Income tax. Make the income tax illegal. No state nor the feds should be allowed to tax income. You want to be Captain America? Fine, do it without taxing income so that all people can choose what they agree with and not. Once you tax income, you are telling people they have to be subjugated to bad rules and a system that doesn't care.

That is completely ridiculous. You need money to have a government, to have roads, electricity, infrastrucutre, police, judges, fire, etc etc etc. also, it is in the constitution.

Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress the power to "lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.
 
And its disgraceful that 58% of the country make so little while we have billionaires buying cruise ships as their personal yachts and we have millions of scumbags who defend these greedy ****er.

Median household income was $67,521 in 2020, a decrease of 2.9 percent from the 2019 median of $69,560..

Generally we are a bit better off than, say, Europe:

1650406632258.png


....and that, of course, is just a snapshot. Most people start off lower than that, and end up higher than that:

It turns out that [in the United States] 12% of the population will find themselves in the top 1% of the income distribution for at least one year. What’s more, 39% of Americans will spend a year in the top 5% of the income distribution, 56% will find themselves in the top 10%, and a whopping 73% will spend a year in the top 20% of the income distribution....
One of the reasons for such fluidity at the top is that, over sufficiently long periods of time, most American households go through a wide range of economic experiences, both positive and negative....
It is clear that the image of a static 1 and 99 percent is largely incorrect. The majority of Americans will experience at least one year of affluence at some point during their working careers. This is just as true at the bottom of the income distribution scale, where 54% of Americans will experience poverty or near poverty at least once between the ages of 25 and 60... rather than being a place of static, income-based social tiers, America is a place where a large majority of people will experience either wealth or poverty — or both — during their lifetimes.



The Class Warfare routine might sell better if it wasn't trying to convince Americans not to believe our lying eyes when it comes to our own living conditions. Most Americans are doing pretty well.
 
Back
Top Bottom