The rebels used the chemical weapons on civilians.
Obama's hands were tied on Syria, stop lying about this. Clinton was dispatched to the UN on three occasions to secure a resolution for use of force, all three times Russia and China said NO!!!!!
The UK parliament said no to military action in Syria.
Congress would not authorize the use of force in Syria.
70% of Americans were against military action in Syria.
I know you would have preferred Obama be the belligerent that Bush was.
Why does the left feel the need to hide their true beliefs? C'mon, shout it out, if it's so great.
You guys hate the Constitution, want that gone. Too restrictive on what government can do. Taxes are never high enough, you want government to take more of what we make. You never, ever want to cut government, because they are not yet into our lives enough yet. Tell me, when will that be?
When will you say, "Hey, government has grown big enough, and has enough control of our lives. Government has taken enough freedoms from us. Let's put a stop to it."
And really, why hide behind names like "progressive" or "liberal"? I have more respect for those on here that come right out and call themselves Communists than the people that are, but won't say it.
His hands are always tied for some reason
On Ukraine, on the Border issue, on Syria, on Issis, on Benghazi on Egypt.
Every foreign policy disaster is no fault of his.
It just reinforces the importance of electing a qualified lead every 4 years
No, I'm talking about the whole " Bush lied people died " manufactured false narrative.
Actually.................it was bush that saw the constitution an impediment, had you not allowed him to get away with it then, we wouldn't be talking about it now!
Washington, BC- In response to a Federal Judge's ruling that his warrant-less surveillance and wiretappings were illegal and unconstitutional, President Bush held a press conference at his personal retreat.
At this conference, President Bush lashed out as what many see as his biggest impediment: the United States Constitution.
"I strongly disagree with that document. Strongly disagree," President Bush said. The president called the Constitution, "out of touch with 21st century terror."
"Now look, here's the Constitution, it was written 200 years ago. They didn't have this kind of a threat. They didn't have to be adaptive. They made all these restricting rules, and there's no way to change it. It is out of place in this century, in this fight. Al-queda doesn't care about it, so we can't either."
UnNews:Bush Calls U.S. Constitution "Naive" - Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
WASHINGTON -- These days, when we think of George W. Bush, we think mostly of what a horrible mess he made of the economy. But his even more tragic legacy is the loss of our moral authority, and the transformation of the United States of America from global champion of human rights into an outlaw nation.
History is likely to judge Bush most harshly for two things in particular: Launching a war against a country that had not attacked us, and approving the use of cruel and inhumane interrogation techniques.
The Two Most Essential, Abhorrent, Intolerable Lies Of George W. Bush's Memoir
Not sure if this is going to be considered the right place to post this, but I think it is breaking news to uncover the corruption going on in the media these days....In true Journ O list form this is far more corrosive...The marriage between left wing, (possibly socialist/communist) professors in our University system to shape what we are told, and not told is the end of journalism as we knew it.
No longer is it just the facts, but pure propaganda spewing from the left. It is dangerous to a free society, somethings today's progressive seems to relish.
Well, that's a bit off the path of my post. Every President feels restricted by the Constitution, they just don't abuse it they way Obama does.
LOL !!
A Huffington Post Op ed ? You're joking right ?
It really is funny...the op is naming every source the progs are using to say nuh-uh....LOL !!
A Huffington Post Op ed ? You're joking right ?
It must not be very secretive or we wouldn't be talking about it here, eh?
Who wants to bet that this thread won't turn into a partisan battle about BS?
"You're just jealous of rich people."
And really, why hide behind names like "progressive" or "liberal"? I have more respect for those on here that come right out and call themselves Communists than the people that are, but won't say it.
Not sure if this is going to be considered the right place to post this, but I think it is breaking news to uncover the corruption going on in the media these days....In true Journ O list form this is far more corrosive...The marriage between left wing, (possibly socialist/communist) professors in our University system to shape what we are told, and not told is the end of journalism as we knew it.
No longer is it just the facts, but pure propaganda spewing from the left. It is dangerous to a free society, somethings today's progressive seems to relish.
Uh, no! This reflects the views of many Americans, in fact you see it on this board
Well, that's a bit off the path of my post. Every President feels restricted by the Constitution, they just don't abuse it they way Obama does.
It really is funny...the op is naming every source the progs are using to say nuh-uh....
1,000?
It's more than that - the media in general is progressive. As a Libertarian that has no allegiance to the right or left I can tell you that just about everything I read has a progressive slant and the strong majority of media outlets are massively progressive.
There is certainly a conspiracy - traditional journalism is dead.
Or maybe it just means that you're not part of their target market. The middle.
Sure there are " differing views ", but that doesn't mean those views are correct or even relevant.
If you want to trade away any semblance of credibility by linking to hack Web sites then be my guest.
Just don't expect to be taken seriously.
Exactly, however News shouldn't have a "target market" it should be honest objective journalism - not pandering to the right or the left.
I would love to just open a paper and not have to read a news article that is basically an op-ed piece presented as a legitimate non-partisan story of information.
I was going to be a journalist until I realized how full of **** the media and journalists are..... These "professors" teach you how to be a deceptive journalist... They teach you nonsense like "burying" the facts or information that contradicts YOUR opinion as a journalist at the end of the article or how to be vague when it comes to ideas you as a journalist don't agree with.... It's horrible...
There is no honesty, integrity or objectivity in journalism anymore - no it's all about pandering to your target audience..
Hell, I have to read like 5 different articles to get the real story.... It sucks..
I don't care what the journalists partisan position on a story is - I just want the REAL facts - not THEIR perspective on the news.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?