- Joined
- Aug 31, 2018
- Messages
- 56,302
- Reaction score
- 24,956
This was an old dude photographing women.
LOL, so? Are older men not allowed at the beach?
Too funny, lol.
This was an old dude photographing women.
LOL, so? Are older men not allowed at the beach?
Too funny, lol.
It seems like very creepy anti social behavior. There are cases of men doing stuff like this to kids and women and it leads to exposing themselves and public masturbation. If people did feel harassed and uncomfortable, call the cops. the police can ask him to leave after questioning him and possibly running a background check. While it may not warrant an arrest, it’s still not the kind of behavior to accept either.They're creepers. That's without question. But you don't have any standing to demand someone delete photographs of you taken when you are both lawfully in position.
As divorced from the specific topic here and as a very general statement, I have had that thought as well.
But there are gradations, are there not? Taking a brief glance vs. ogling vs. taking photos for later. I'd go out on a limb and guess that as a man, I'm just not likely to notice the full extent of how much women get stared at....
So, exactly how does keeping your hands to yourself, keeping your pants zipped, and not talking about private parts get you canceled, fired, or recalled?Flowing these rules will get you canceled, fired or recalled.
Voyeur. That's the correct word here. Thanx.
Definition of VOYEUR
someone who obtains sexual gratification from observing unsuspecting individuals who are partly undressed, naked, or engaged in sexual acts; broadly : someone who habitually seeks sexual stimulation by visual means; a person who commits the crime of voyeurism… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
You're playing two moves ahead with a guy struggling to keep up to one.Oh so you're saying women should be punched in the face for having opinions different than yours!???
It seems like very creepy anti social behavior. There are cases of men doing stuff like this to kids and women and it leads to exposing themselves and public masturbation. If people did feel harassed and uncomfortable, call the cops. the police can ask him to leave after questioning him and possibly running a background check. While it may not warrant an arrest, it’s still not the kind of behavior to accept either.
So, exactly how does keeping your hands to yourself, keeping your pants zipped, and not talking about private parts get you canceled, fired, or recalled?
Then this is where we differ. To me, turning one's head to look at another person is not "going out of one's way".What do your mother/sister/girlfriend/daughter think? To me, it's actively going out of your way to ogle them without their knowledge.
There can be other reasons for that. Maybe they are afraid that if they look at the woman as they walk towards her, she might complain that she is being "sexually assaulted", and what-not. In the climate that we live in, this is a valid concern.Quite different to enjoying the view if a woman happens to be walking in front of you. Seems to me when I see other guys turning around for a woman they've passed it's most often the ones who while walking towards each other are avoiding eye contact and pretending that they're not interested.
Maybe those who have a low-esteem do think that. For other men, looking at an attractive woman, whether it's when they are walking towards her or after she has walked past, is simply a normal part of being a heterosexual man.By implication even they think their actions are creepy.
Really? Do you own any dictionaries?no it is not
voyeurism requires one to trespasses or otherwise surreptitiously invades the privacy of another to spy for sexual arousal or gratification.
Relating to women for dolts, part two.suppose you ask a women if she is married, or has a boyfriend?
ask a women out?
tell them they look nice?
Offer to buy them coffee?
You don't have to be a Donald to get cancelled if teh women is "in a bad mood" that week.
Heck, looking at a women can get you canceled if she is nutso enough.
Really? Do you own any dictionaries?
Please look at various dictionaries that are legitimate.
Like Seinfeld explained to George. "Cleavage is like the sun, you take a quick glance so you know where it is, you don't stare at it".They're creepers. That's without question. But you don't have any standing to demand someone delete photographs of you taken when you are both lawfully in position.
As divorced from the specific topic here and as a very general statement, I have had that thought as well.
But there are gradations, are there not? Taking a brief glance vs. ogling vs. taking photos for later. I'd go out on a limb and guess that as a man, I'm just not likely to notice the full extent of how much women get stared at....
Relating to women for dolts, part two.
If you ask a woman a question, LISTEN to the woman's response. Respect the woman's response.
Just like the kindergarten rules. Easy peasy.
It is easy. If Cuomo followed kindergarten rules (keep your hands to yourself), he wouldn't be in this predicament.If it were only this easy.
Out here in the real world, women are being bitches to advance careers, get attention, screw men over or just because they are ****ed up.
Don't believe me, just read about the women who have come forward to accuse Cuomo in NY.
Everyone of them falls into one of these categories I just listed.
True.
And yet, there are no "uncomfortable" police.
'Delete them all': Girl catches older men taking pictures of girls in bikinis on beach
A girl confronts two older men for taking pictures of girls and women in bikinis on a beach in Florida and yells at them to delete the photos.www.dailydot.com
Video at link.
My thoughts:
1. There is no expectation of privacy in public. What those guys did was perfectly legal. Just as legal as what the girl did in videoing them and posting that video online.
2. I believe in actions and consequences. If you wear a bikini in public...you might just get photographed. I've always found the concept of a woman wearing something so revealing and sexy and then complaining when people look at her body, puzzling.
By the same token, if you're ogling girls in bikinis or taking pictures of them and get called out on it, that's fair game, too.
Free speech cuts both ways.
3. She had every right to ask him to delete the photos...and he had every right to refuse.
Gay males act the same way, just that the subject of their ogling is also men.”I guess” to all of this. It’s just this is pretty normal behavior for cis males, and it’s cis males who make the biggest deals out of who goes into what restrooms. For me, it’s the gall of living in a society in which we know cis males make up the largest share of sexual creepers and they also make up the largest share of noise regarding everyone else’s genitals.
Gay males act the same way, just that the subject of their ogling is also men.
I think it's a guy thing.
A 180 degree turn from where you're walking is not out of your way? Seems like the very definition of it to me.Then this is where we differ. To me, turning one's head to look at another person is not "going out of one's way".
'Creepy' is just an opinion of course; but social opinions can be made a little less subjective by reference to a broader range of views from folk whose opinions we respect.And what my mother/sister...etc thinks is irrelevant. Whether an act is creepy is not determined by what some women might think.
For men of weak character perhaps, or for men whose objectification of women can't be disguised. Personally I figure that if I'm honest and respectful and someone has a problem with that, I'll deal with it at the time, not subvert my own behaviour out of some kind of hyped-up fearfulness. So far no-one's said they have a problem with it.There can be other reasons for that. Maybe they are afraid that if they look at the woman as they walk towards her, she might complain that she is being "sexually assaulted", and what-not. In the climate that we live in, this is a valid concern.
On the scale from 'respecting her as a person' to 'objectifying her body,' where do you suppose this would lie? Again, opinions may differ, but it's not like you're deciding whether to ask her out or something (as might at least potentially be the case in many other types of ogling); it's explicitly and exclusively about getting your own momentary titillation out of her body.Maybe those who have a low-esteem do think that. For other men, looking at an attractive woman, whether it's when they are walking towards her or after she has walked past, is simply a normal part of being a heterosexual man.
And another reason that men want to turn their head could be that they want to look at what the buttocks of this beautiful woman looks like. If her front is so beautiful, then her buttocks is probably beautiful too. So this could be another reason.
It is easy. If Cuomo followed kindergarten rules (keep your hands to yourself), he wouldn't be in this predicament.
I guess we will simply have to agree to disagree.A 180 degree turn from where you're walking is not out of your way? Seems like the very definition of it to me.
And what if between the two of us, we have a differing view of whose opinions we should respect? Maybe you respect the opinion/s of your mother/sister..etc, but I don't? And it's not because I actively disrespect them, but rather, it's that I don't know them at all, therefore I cannot say I respect their opinions?'Creepy' is just an opinion of course; but social opinions can be made a little less subjective by reference to a broader range of views from folk whose opinions we respect.
For men of weak character perhaps, or for men whose objectification of women can't be disguised.
I think that your chief motivation is to respect women as people, and I commend that. And to answer your question, I personally think that for a man to look at a woman's body, is mostly a harmless thing, aka, not creepy. I guess creepy would be like taking pictures of her body without her permission or knowledge, or staring really long and hard. Of course, I know this is all subjective.Personally I figure that if I'm honest and respectful and someone has a problem with that, I'll deal with it at the time, not subvert my own behaviour out of some kind of hyped-up fearfulness. So far no-one's said they have a problem with it.
On the scale from 'respecting her as a person' to 'objectifying her body,' where do you suppose this would lie? Again, opinions may differ, but it's not like you're deciding whether to ask her out or something (as might at least potentially be the case in many other types of ogling); it's explicitly and exclusively about getting your own momentary titillation out of her body. Is it a big deal? No, not really, and obviously a lot of guys do it. Still kinda creepy, in my opinion.
I can't say I have had that experience lately either, I am an old guy now, but when I was young and good looking it was pretty regular thing in certain company. I actually enjoyed the attention, even though I am straight. I have always been an ally.I have not had similiar experience, and on a macrolevel gay men have never/do not have the leverage to impact public policy as cis men have/do.
It’s not gay men demanding to stare at everyone’s genitals before they’re allowed to go into a given bathroom or participate in a high school sport.