Zimmerman to get "Stand Your Ground" hearing.....developing

[sharon]

You still haven't provided proof of such, so are only blowing smoke and spewing your vile hatred of the guy.

Go ahead and listen the SPD interviews and watch Hannity.

BTW.. this is a broken nose.

 

[Excon]

Go ahead and listen the SPD interviews and watch Hannity.

BTW.. this is a broken nose.

[COLOR="#44244"]You already know it doesn't work that way.

You made the claim, support it, with links and exact quotes, or links with exact time stamps.

Otherwise you are just lying to us all.




And I see you are still trying to be a bully in spamming irrelevant information, huh?


Well let me post what was already posted in reply to your bs.[/COLOR]

That is a broken nose on him. And him alone.


The following is a broken nose on Zimmerman.

 

[Furiounova]

His own doctor couldn't even conclusively state it was broken but the more important part of his own doctor's report is: NO head trauma.

 

[sharon]

[COLOR="#44244"]You already know it doesn't work that way.

You made the claim, support it, with links and exact quotes, or links with exact time stamps.

Otherwise you are just lying to us all.




And I see you are still trying to be a bully in spamming irrelevant information, huh?


Well let me post what was already posted in reply to your bs.[/COLOR]

​

I had some tiny pinprick cuts like that on my face when a branch slapped me in the face while I was bush-hogging.

 

[sharon]

His own doctor couldn't even conclusively state it was broken but the more important part of his own doctor's report is: NO head trauma.

Hey.. This is where O'Mara is going now.

Check out 2(b)

776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or

(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or

(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.

 

[Furiounova]

I had some tiny pinprick cuts like that on my face when a branch slapped me in the face while I was bush-hogging.

Did you shoot it and claim self defense?

I think it's pretty revealing more than one cop said it didn't look broken. The only cop to say it looked broken wrote his report more than a month after the shooting and at the same time GZ's 1st lawyer invented the broken nose myth.

 

[sharon]

Did you shoot it and claim self defense?

Lord no.. I washed my face with soapy water and a cold rinse, pulled on a cotton skirt and went out to dinner.

I think it's pretty revealing more than one cop said it didn't look broken. The only cop to say it looked broken wrote his report more than a month after the shooting and at the same time GZ's 1st lawyer invented the broken nose myth.

Didn't look broken to me.. probbly sore, a little swollen.. but not life threatening by any stretch of the imagination.

 

[Furiounova]

Hey.. This is where O'Mara is going now.

Check out 2(b)

776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or

(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or

(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.

That will be a tough sell but we've always known that.

 

[Excon]

His own doctor couldn't even conclusively state it was broken but the more important part of his own doctor's report is: NO head trauma.

Besides the fact we can all see the trauma of his head, you are wrong.

It has been pointed out to you many times already.
What you are saying is a lie, as already pointed out.

---

I had some tiny pinprick cuts like that on my face when a branch slapped me in the face while I was bush-hogging.

Your nose did not look like this, and you did not have blood dripping from it like this, or blood in your mustache like he did.

Hey.. This is where O'Mara is going now.

Check out 2(b)

776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or

(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or

(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.

iLOL
Hey Sharon, what world did you get that info from?

They will be having a SYG hearing in the future, where a Judge will decide if Zimmerman was of a "reasonably belief" that death was imminent or that he may suffer GBH.

That has nothing to do with what you posted above. lol

If he does not succeed at this hearing, he will appeal and may be successful there.

If he is not, then he will argue SYG - "Self Defense" to the jury, and in the alternative, he will also argue that if the jury should find that Zimmerman was the aggressor, that he could not withdraw because of Trayvons actions.
That is the only time what you have presented will come into play.

And contrary to your fellow acolyte, that is not difficult to show.

 

[sharon]

Besides the fact we can all see the trauma of his head, you are wrong.

It has been pointed out to you many times already.
What you are saying is a lie, as already pointed out.

---

Your nose did not look like this, and you did not have blood dripping from it like this, or blood in your mustache like he did.

iLOL
Hey Sharon, what world did you get that info from?

They will be having a SYG hearing in the future, where a Judge will decide if Zimmerman was of a "reasonably belief" that death was imminent or that he may suffer GBH.

That has nothing to do with what you posted above. lol

If he does not succeed at this hearing, he will appeal and may be successful there.

If he is not, then he will argue SYG - "Self Defense" to the jury, and in the alternative, he will also argue that if the jury should find that Zimmerman was the aggressor, that he could not withdraw because of Trayvons actions.
That is the only time what you have presented will come into play.

And contrary to your fellow acolyte, that is not difficult to show.

Didn't you watch the press conference today.. O'Mara said its not a SYG case.

 

[Furiounova]

Besides the fact we can all see the trauma of his head, you are wrong.

It has been pointed out to you many times already.
What you are saying is a lie, as already pointed out.

---

Your nose did not look like this, and you did not have blood dripping from it like this, or blood in your mustache like he did.

iLOL
Hey Sharon, what world did you get that info from?

They will be having a SYG hearing in the future, where a Judge will decide if Zimmerman was of a "reasonably belief" that death was imminent or that he may suffer GBH.

That has nothing to do with what you posted above. lol

If he does not succeed at this hearing, he will appeal and may be successful there.

If he is not, then he will argue SYG - "Self Defense" to the jury, and in the alternative, he will also argue that if the jury should find that Zimmerman was the aggressor, that he could not withdraw because of Trayvons actions.
That is the only time what you have presented will come into play.

And contrary to your fellow acolyte, that is not difficult to show.

That is awesome!! A GZ supporter contradicting GZ's own doctor!! Lol......priceless!!!

 

[joko104]

That is awesome!! A GZ supporter contradicting GZ's own doctor!! Lol......priceless!!!

^ Another false message.

 

[Furiounova]

^ Another false message.

His doctor's report stated no head trauma. You probably didn't know that.

 

[joko104]

Oh really?

Where is a doctor's report that GZ suffered no head injuries?

Absolutely NO ONE is convinced by your claim that the police, EMT and doctor all conspired to use stage makeup to create fake injuries using fake blood. Your posting that bizarre claim 50 times doesn't make it convincing.

 

[Furiounova]

Oh really?

Where is a doctor's report that GZ suffered no head injuries?

Absolutely NO ONE is convinced by your claim that the police, EMT and doctor all conspired to use stage makeup to create fake injuries using fake blood. Your posting that bizarre claim 50 times doesn't make it convincing.

His doctor's report stated no head TRAUMA. Do you know what that means?

 

[joko104]

His doctor's report stated no head TRAUMA. Do you know what that means?

Obviously you don't. Most of us actually do.

 

[Excon]

That is awesome!! A GZ supporter contradicting GZ's own doctor!! Lol......priceless!!!

iLOL
I haven't contradicted his Doctor at all.
If I have, I am more than sure you could provide proof of what his Doctor actually said. :slapme:

His doctor's report stated no head TRAUMA. Do you know what that means?

No it didn't.
You do not have a Doctor's report saying any such thing. lol :slapme:


And while you are searching for that non-existent Doctor's report, I would suggest that you read the Medical Report by the PA and rectify the visuals injuries with the reports use of the word atraumatic. iLOL
Instead of running around spouting that their was a Doctors report, and no trauma to the head, when it can be clearly seen.

 

[ric27]

His doctor's report stated no head TRAUMA. Do you know what that means?

It means.... you have no idea what you are talking about in a legal sense

If I point a gun at your head, you (or anyone else) are likely to have a reasonable fear of such without any injury at all

In other words..It's completely reasonably to fear for serious bodily injury or even death without actually suffering injury.

 

[sharon]

iLOL
I haven't contradicted his Doctor at all.
If I have, I am more than sure you could provide proof of what his Doctor actually said. :slapme:


No it didn't.
You do not have a Doctor's report saying any such thing. lol :slapme:


And while you are searching for that non-existent Doctor's report, I would suggest that you read the Medical Report by the PA and rectify the visuals injuries with the reports use of the word atraumatic. iLOL
Instead of running around spouting that their was a Doctors report, and no trauma to the head, when it can be clearly seen.

George's doctor's report and the EMT report are all in the first evidence dump..

George had no head trauma and a suspected broken nose with no displacement. (closed fracuture)

She referred him to an ENT and a psychiatrist.. he didn't follow up on either.. He went on to work, told his employer that he'd killed a mugger and left.

 

[Furiounova]

It means.... you have no idea what you are talking about in a legal sense

If I point a gun at your head, you (or anyone else) are likely to have a reasonable fear of such without any injury at all

In other words..It's completely reasonably to fear for serious bodily injury or even death without actually suffering injury.

I never said you had to have bodily injury to be in fear for your life. Try responding to what is actually posted.

 

[Furiounova]

iLOL
I haven't contradicted his Doctor at all.
If I have, I am more than sure you could provide proof of what his Doctor actually said. :slapme:


No it didn't.
You do not have a Doctor's report saying any such thing. lol :slapme:


And while you are searching for that non-existent Doctor's report, I would suggest that you read the Medical Report by the PA and rectify the visuals injuries with the reports use of the word atraumatic. iLOL
Instead of running around spouting that their was a Doctors report, and no trauma to the head, when it can be clearly seen.

Take your pick of which source you would like to use:

zimmerman doctor report no head trauma - Google Search

It is so not surprising you don't know what his own doctor's report states.

 

[Excon]

George's doctor's report ... are all in the first evidence dump..

Wrong!
How many times do you have to be told that it was a PA and not a Doctor before it sinks into your head?

George had no head trauma and a suspected broken nose with no displacement. (closed fracuture)

Yes, a broken nose.
Now rectify the use of the word atraumatic with the actual trauma we can see.

She referred him to an ENT and a psychiatrist.. he didn't follow up on either..

There is a difference between a referral and just recommending. Get it straight.
And as far as I know, he did go see his psych.



So after everything you said, all you are left with is that he didn't follow a suggestion to go and see an ENT. BFD!

 

[Excon]

Take your pick of which source you would like to use:

zimmerman doctor report no head trauma - Google Search

It is so not surprising you don't know what his own doctor's report states.

How rediculous.
Let me paraphrase; 'Here is google, that is my proof.' iLOL :slapme:


It isn't surprising that you do not know what you are talking about even though you have been informed of it many times over.
What a pity.
You are still wrong!

 

[sharon]

Wrong!
How many times do you have to be told that it was a PA and not a Doctor before it sinks into your head?



Yes, a broken nose.
Now rectify the use of the word atraumatic with the actual trauma we can see.



There is a difference between a referral and just recommending. Get it straight.
And as far as I know, he did go see his psych.



So after everything you said, all you are left with is that he didn't follow a suggestion to go and see an ENT. BFD!

You have the medical reports and ... the EMTs and Doctor are on the witness list.

Look .. George has heightened negative and paranoiac feelings .. he has been knee-jerk scared of everything all his life.. That's why he overreacts, carries a gun and has no judgment.

Trayvon was never a threat to George or the neighborhood.. George is delusional.. and that makes him dangerous.

 

[Furiounova]

How rediculous.
Let me paraphrase; 'Here is google, that is my proof.' iLOL :slapme:


It isn't surprising that you do not know what you are talking about even though you have been informed of it many times over.
What a pity.
You are still wrong!

I just wanted to make sure you could never say nobody provided a link. There are plenty of links and you ignored them all because you contradicted what his own doctor stated.