Don't get MY words mixed up with someone elses. I said "bleeding". Ive never claimed to know the depth of any gash on anyone's head. You are adding adjectives to MY statements to help make your point.
I didn't get your words mixed up with someone else. I said, "You people".
So, are you going to be on record to tell Excon he was wrong to call Zimmerman's wounds as "gashing wounds"?
Quote me as stating "Trayvon had his hand covering Zimmerman's bleeding nose" and you'll have a point.
Ridiculous logic.
Of course you didn't mention "Trayvon had his hand covering Zimmerman's bleeding nose". That's the point. You were evading my point about that claim of his that was disproven by the forensic evidence.
Instead of addressing the above point, you evade that into a small cut on Zimmerman's face which wasn't even in debate. Why can't you be honest for a change? While you are at it, try to be logical and make some sense in your rebuttal also.
Im evading nothing. You are crediting me with statements that I have not made. If you are arguing towards me with someone elses statements and attributing them to me, maybe you are barking up the wrong tree, hrm?
Go back to your post #723:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...e-being-struck-w-815-a-73.html#post1060672894
Previously I said:
"We are not just talking about simple punching. We are talking about repeated punching and head slamming with 50% of the head covered in blood and Trayvon's hands were said to cover his broken nose and grabbed his bloody head."
In your reply, you didn't address my point about "repeated punching and head slamming with 50% of the head covered in blood and Trayvon's hands were said to cover his broken nose and grabbed his bloody head." You didn't even dare to address the nose covering part. Instead, you evaded and said:
"As you can see from the photos posted, the cut on the front of his face was extremely small compared to the total size of his face... That leads to a very great amount of space that can be touched without blood transfer. A cut that small is not going to be spurting blood like the episode of Beavis and Butthead when they accidentally chop Beavis's finger off or anything.
Obviously, the cuts on the back of his head were on the back of his head..... and not facing Trayvon. Nobody is claiming he was bleeding PROFUSELY, losing pints at a time or anything like that."
I didn't asked you about the "estremely small" cut in front of his face. Why did you purposely evade the pertinent one in front of his face which I did mention, i.e. his bleeding broken nose that was said to be covered by Trayvon's hand? That was the whole argument but you just convieniently set up a strawman to make your case as a desperate attemopt at evasion.
WHAT DO YOU MEAN.... "YOU PEOPLE"!!!
In all seriousness though..... why are you treating one Zimmerman supporters statement as a blanket net cast upon every person who doesn't believe he is a child murdering sack of ****, as you do?
You people = you, Excon, zoko, etc = Zimmerman supporters. Oh, also that blind supporter of yours who whined about "anti-TM evidence", which are all fairy tales of course.
This was what I said:
"You people simply want to ignore forensic science and logic at all cost to defend your ground for Zimmerman."
On that point alone you and Excon, zoko and other Zimmerman supporters on this board do agree unanimously by ignoring and dismissing or trying to explain away the inconsistency in Zimmerman's account of Trayvon covering his bleeding nose with his hand that was not supported by forensic finding of no Zimmerman's blood found on Trayvon's hands or sleeve cuffs.
There are many inconsistencies in Zimmerman's accounts. But this is just one of them we are addressing right now.
Because one side continues to look at real evidence while they other watches too much CSI and says, "Well what if X" "Y Could have happened, ever think of that!!!" and "I don't believe Trayvon would do X, Y, oR Z"
And when asked for proof, misdirection is always a guarantee.
I don't have a TV to watch anything let alone CSI. I don't even like watching CSI or any make believe ER show. If I have access to a TV, I'd like to watch real life crime report not from someone's imaginative scripts.
Talk about you being a police office and looking at real evidence, just tell me: How is it possible to have Trayvon's hand pressing hard against Zimmerman's bleeding broken nose and yet had no trace of blood in his hand? We are not even talking about his other hand covering Zimmerman's screaming mouth and many other inconsistencies and contradictions.
When you have to explain away the impossible events of not just one inconsistency, not even just two, not three, not four and not five but many more, there is something wrong not only in Zimmerman's claims but something is also seriously wrong with you people.
Stop with the personal attacks or else.
