- Joined
- Mar 30, 2016
- Messages
- 92,713
- Reaction score
- 22,305
- Location
- Chicago
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Consistently unable to face up to what the US does around the globe right up until the present.I oppose the position of "might makes right" whether its advocated by you or the US government.
I'm, at least, consistent.
Consistently unable to face up to what the US does around the globe right up until the present.
Thats what Z wants. He still wants those security guarantees as well. As a matter of fact he seems to want it all,I don't see total victory a possibility without other nations providing troops to fight.
Total loss could easily become the only possibility.
He's going to get a rude awakening if he insists Ukr 's constitution governs any peace talkZelensky said before leaving South Africa, stating Ukraine had made counter-proposals in return. Per Ukrainian state media, these included further calls for major Western military — as Ukraine has persistently asked for over the course of months — support including the deployment of “contingents” of foreign armed forces to the country for peacekeeping.
Also raised was Ukraine’s ultimate ask for peace: security guarantees in case of future Russian aggression, which it likens to NATO’s article five mutual defence clause.
Why, so you can ignore it like every other link I’ve provided?Link?
Why do you support it in the present?
Why, so you can ignore it like every other link I’ve provided?
Why do you think ignoring reality can change it?
How convenientNever seen one.
Why do you now support "might makes right?"
Here's the link.
Zelensky Publicly Rejected Trump’s Peace Plan
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/04/26/zelensky-publicly-rejected-trumps-peace-plan-preferring-push-for-maximalist-total-victory-scenario/ Kyiv in recent days is far from complimentary about President Trump’s proposals. An American blueprint for peace in Ukraine was put before combatants...debatepolitics.com
For example, the Ukrainian Constitution attempts to cover every imaginable legal contingency and contains 161 articles. In comparison, the US Constitution contains a mere seven articles.The case for a new Ukrainian Constitution
As Ukraine fights for its survival as a nation, it may be time to adopt a new constitution that matches the country's current realities and future ambitions, writes Brian Mefford.www.atlanticcouncil.org
Another key complaint is that the Ukrainian Constitution essentially makes promises the government cannot keep. Citizens are assured of everything from free housing to free medical care and free higher education. In practice, this has proven impossible.
How convenient
So, how since “might doesn’t make right” when are the US forces being pulled out of Iraq and Syria, as the locals have been demanding for years now?
Way to dodge the question.You don't support it there, but support it here. Why the inconsistency?
For example, the Ukrainian Constitution attempts to cover every imaginable legal contingency and contains 161 articles. In comparison, the US Constitution contains a mere seven articles.The case for a new Ukrainian Constitution
As Ukraine fights for its survival as a nation, it may be time to adopt a new constitution that matches the country's current realities and future ambitions, writes Brian Mefford.www.atlanticcouncil.org
Another key complaint is that the Ukrainian Constitution essentially makes promises the government cannot keep. Citizens are assured of everything from free housing to free medical care and free higher education. In practice, this has proven impossible.
Way to dodge the question.
Given your assertion, you must support American troops being forced to leave Iraq and Syria, in accordance with the locals’ wishes, right?
So since you keep dodging, I’ll have to chalk that up as you saying no, you don’t support American troops being forced to leave Iraq and Syria in accordance with the locals’ wishes.So you cannot explain your inconsistency. Ok.
So since you keep dodging, I’ll have to chalk that up as you saying no, you don’t support American troops being forced to leave Iraq and Syria in accordance with the locals’ wishes.
As a result, your claim that you don’t support “might makes right” is clearly blatantly untrue.
You claimed you don’t support it, but you very clearly do.You do support it whole heartedly, when it comes to Russia. Nice double standard.
Zelensky needs to STFU because if we stop financing his war, his ass will be in a Russia work camp soom. Ingrateful asshole.Kyiv in recent days is far from complimentary about President Trump’s proposals. An American blueprint for peace in Ukraine was put before combatants this week and quickly rejected as politically impossible by Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky, who cited the national constitution as making anything but total victory impossible. perhaps the greater stumbling block to achieving a workable peace agreement is President Zelensky’s insistence that he would do nothing in contradiction of the letter of the Ukrainian constitution.Zelensky Rejects Trump's Peace Plan, Preferring Total Victory Scenario
Even as talks progress and Trump says there is hope for a deal, Zelensky saying the Ukrainian constitution calls for total victory.www.breitbart.com
the constitution states the nation’s borders are “indivisible and inviolable”, this essentially locks him and Ukraine into pushing for a maximalist total victory, with every square yard of the nation’s United Nations-recognised territory liberated. Three years of brutal fighting and hundreds of thousands of lives have yet to achieve this goal.
President Zelensky said of this position that he would accept only a total defeat of the Russian invasion, a peace on unobtainable terms: “Anything that contradicts our values or our Constitution cannot be included in any agreements”.
in the case of the Ukrainian government really wanting peace the constitution could be amended. But until that time comes, plenty more constitutionalist obstructions can be found, such as any changes to the document needing to be ratified by a national referendum, and elections being impossible under wartime conditions and martial law, which is also Zelensky’s rationale for not having had to face re-election yet.
Zelensky needs to STFU because if we stop financing his war, his ass will be in a Russia work camp soom. Ingrateful asshole.
He has been buoyed up by all the people that claim to support him...and he actually believes they are willing to fight alongside him...err...alongside the kids he is seizing off the street and pushing into combat.I don't see total victory a possibility without other nations providing troops to fight.
Total loss could easily become the only possibility.
^ about sums it up. Both Z and Putin are petulant with promises to soothe Trump , Sooner or later Trump is going to walk awayZelensky needs to STFU because if we stop financing his war, his ass will be in a Russia work camp soom. Ingrateful asshole.
^ about sums it up. Both Z and Putin are petulant with promises to soothe Trump , Sooner or later Trump is going to walk away
( I think Congress already has) and then Z has to rely on Europe which talks a big game but wont do much
Fine by me of course. Europe can put up or shut up, What happens to Ukraine is their problem -not the USA's
Why would any one support Ukraine giving up part of its country to an attacker? Even Trump knows that is impossible.Kyiv in recent days is far from complimentary about President Trump’s proposals. An American blueprint for peace in Ukraine was put before combatants this week and quickly rejected as politically impossible by Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky, who cited the national constitution as making anything but total victory impossible. perhaps the greater stumbling block to achieving a workable peace agreement is President Zelensky’s insistence that he would do nothing in contradiction of the letter of the Ukrainian constitution.Zelensky Rejects Trump's Peace Plan, Preferring Total Victory Scenario
Even as talks progress and Trump says there is hope for a deal, Zelensky saying the Ukrainian constitution calls for total victory.www.breitbart.com
the constitution states the nation’s borders are “indivisible and inviolable”, this essentially locks him and Ukraine into pushing for a maximalist total victory, with every square yard of the nation’s United Nations-recognised territory liberated. Three years of brutal fighting and hundreds of thousands of lives have yet to achieve this goal.
President Zelensky said of this position that he would accept only a total defeat of the Russian invasion, a peace on unobtainable terms: “Anything that contradicts our values or our Constitution cannot be included in any agreements”.
in the case of the Ukrainian government really wanting peace the constitution could be amended. But until that time comes, plenty more constitutionalist obstructions can be found, such as any changes to the document needing to be ratified by a national referendum, and elections being impossible under wartime conditions and martial law, which is also Zelensky’s rationale for not having had to face re-election yet.
because Z is losing ground. Because more US aid is at least in doubt, so it's better to give up Crimea ( which has been done de facto) and some eastern/south oblast territory..The problem now is Putin doesnt want to stop the war because he is "winning"Why would any one support Ukraine giving up part of its country to an attacker? Even Trump knows that is impossible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?