• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Your Pension/401K

What effective tax rate would you accept on 401k/Pension earnings?

  • 5% or less

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 30% or less

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 40% or less

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 50% or less

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't know/don't care

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7

tessaesque

Bring us a shrubbery!
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
15,910
Reaction score
12,631
Location
Plano, Texas
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
Assuming that a tax is applied to any gains over the initial investments (yours and your employers), what is the maximum tax you would be willing to pay on those earnings?
 
Assuming that a tax is applied to any gains over the initial investments (yours and your employers), what is the maximum tax you would be willing to pay on those earnings?

Assuming its not ROTH?
 
Assuming its not ROTH?

I'm dumbing the issue way, way down, I believe. I guess I should have called it "retirement investment" to simplify it. Let's just say you have a retirement fund that you and your employer contribute to, which is set up to gain interest or earnings over time. If those earnings are taxed, what rate is acceptable for you?
 

oops, misunderstood.....they should not be taxed until they are withdrawn.
 
Last edited:
oops, misunderstood.....they should not be taxed until they are withdrawn.

We're assuming that isn't how it works, but instead are taxed yearly, just like income.
 
I would not oppose a deferred tax on realized earnings, when we actually were able to pull our money, if we also got tax credit on our losses as they occurred.

My 401k investments are just now returning to where they were prior to the crash. Should I get some sort of loss write off for this time period?

I can't pull my money out now without a 10% penalty and a 20% tax. So, we really have no alternative but to let it ride.

Since I am aware of no loss credits, there should neither be any gain tax. One without the other is not even close to fair, IMO.
 
What Captain America said.
 

I like that..interesting perspective.
 
We're assuming that isn't how it works, but instead are taxed yearly, just like income.

the whole point of a 401 was to encourage employees to save. it took the place of pensions that companies USED to offer. we put the money in pretax, when we withdraw it, it's taxed, at a lower marginal rate, ideally, because at that point we have less income. how could you even begin to keep track of gains and losses to tax them? hell, i move money around all the time.
 

Okay, stick with your premise. How much are you will to pay on the total accrued when you withdraw?
 
We're assuming that isn't how it works, but instead are taxed yearly, just like income.

Come to think of it you are right. We are taxed for our gains. But are we credited for our losses?

That's why I pay handsomely to my awesome jewish accountant. 'Cause I am clueless.
 
Last edited:

5%, a large portion (approximately 40%) of my 401k worth came from earnings.
 
We're assuming that isn't how it works, but instead are taxed yearly, just like income.

That is nuts. What you are advocating is for people 20-40 it makes no sense to save for retirement. With social security on the ropes and Medicare all but broke, what are you suggesting to be the fate of younger people in the U.S. Only if you have a government job you are set in retirement with a defined benefit plan everyone else, to damned bad!
 
Whatever. If the Republicans force a default, then you may as well kiss retirement goodbye.
 
Assuming that a tax is applied to any gains over the initial investments (yours and your employers), what is the maximum tax you would be willing to pay on those earnings?

we desperately need people to start saving for retirement. I can think of fewer ways to discourage them from doing so than to start taxing it. In reality, we should make contributions and earnings tax-free.
 
I like that..interesting perspective.

It is quite logical isn't it?

I have the same perspective on inheritance. If dad dies and is a zillion dollars in debt, I'm not responsible for his debt. Do if dad dies and leaves a zillion dollar estate, why should I have any right to inherit his wealth?
 
Okay, stick with your premise. How much are you will to pay on the total accrued when you withdraw?

Investment income should be taxed exactly like any other income. There should not be special strokes for special folks.

That said, I do think that investments should be adjusted for inflation. Many times peoples investments have gone up, but not actually realized a profit after inflation. So inflation should be accounted for.
 
we desperately need people to start saving for retirement. I can think of fewer ways to discourage them from doing so than to start taxing it. In reality, we should make contributions and earnings tax-free.

Isn't that social engineering? I thought that conservatives were against that.

We desperately need people to stop being fat, so do you think we should have a discount tax rate for people who are not fat?
 

1) Money withdrawn from a tax-deferred acct ARE taxed like other income. They aren't tax-free; they are tax-DEFERRED

2) True, but you can pay off the tax with inflated dollars
 
Isn't that social engineering? I thought that conservatives were against that.

We desperately need people to stop being fat, so do you think we should have a discount tax rate for people who are not fat?

is it social engineering? eh. it's an invitation, not a coercive measure - i would draw a distinction between the two. and i think that the obesity crises is nowhere near the savings (or lack thereof) crises. you could just as easily argue that any tax measure the government makes is "social engineering". if it is, this strikes me as a minimalist and particularly wise one, as it only encourages responsible behavior, without punishing irresponsibility or shifting the cost to others.
 

Gee, now the rightwing is saying that taxes are NOT coercive

another rightwing meme gets thrown under the bus for being inconvenient
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…