- Joined
- Jul 5, 2005
- Messages
- 8,682
- Reaction score
- 262
- Location
- Philadelphia,PA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
cnredd said:Alright kids...A little bit of Stat Deduction 101...
Of course, most of us, if not all of us, have a slanted position when debating...we like people to hear our thoghts, and like it when they respond in kind...
But have you ever noticed how certain members don't like the idea of that two-way street?...Ever notice members only wanting to get out their agenda with little regard for YOUR opinions?...
Well, I've done a little research, and found the King of this...His name is danarhea...
If you don't know by now, his modus operandi is to flood the forums with op-ed pieces and Libertarian literature due to his feelings of betrayal from the republican party...sort of like a revenge tactic one would immaturely take out on their ex-spouse or ex-lover...They live for spite...
So that's the agenda...
But I'm more concerned with the other side of debate...Sure he wants you to know how he feels and he wants you to respond...But does he respond in kind to how YOU feel on YOUR threads and topics?
Not a chance in hell!...danarhea doesn't give a rat's ass what anyone on this forum thinks...unless, of course, it's said in HIS thread and HIS topic...If it's in YOUR thread with YOUR topics, he hardly knows you exist...
Here's the data...
Currently, danarhea has a total post count of 939...Here's a stat that should blow the mind away for any veteran member here...
Out of those 939 total posts, 232 of them were starting a new thread!...That's almost 1 out of every 4 posts!...
To give you a fair comparison for how out of whack that is, I have over 6,000 posts...and have started 190 new threads...
BUT...
As a Moderator, most of my threads are discussing issues in the Mod Forum in an administrative capacity...So how many have I started publicly?...
25...
To give you more of an idication of how one person's agenda is being shoved down your throats, I've looked up the members that have more than 2,500 posts...more than 3 times the number of danarhea's total number...The NEXT person in line with the greatest number of posts has 118...The person after that?...78...
That's right folks...The member with LESS than 1000 posts has started more threads than the next TWO members combined...AND they have more than 10 THOUSAND posts!...
For Wayne Gretsky, that would be admirable...In a debate forum, it's pretty friggin' sad...
But that's only half of the story...Here's the bigger issue the members should be concerned about...
Sure...danarhea has an agenda, but does he contribute to the forum by getting involved with everyone else and their discussions?...
Sadly, the answer is "no"...
I've looked up danarhea's last 250 posts...here's the breakdown of the number of posts that dealt with his own agenda compared to the number of his total posts...
20 out of the last 25
37 out of the last 50
53 out of the last 75
72 out of the last 100
90 out of the last 125
110 out of the last 150
140 out of the last 200
175 out of the last 250
By my trusty calculator, he attends to himself 70% of the time while contributing just 30% to the rest of the members.
Just a bit selfish, don't ya think?...
Hey Deegan. Guess what? I didnt get banned. The night that you, Hobbie, KC, and all the others all ganged up on me and started derailing my threads, I kept starting that one thread over and over. Got a week's suspension for spamming. LOL. My account is still active over there, though. I just dont use it anymore. But I gotta ask you. What did they ban you for, because although they suspended me for a week, they didnt do a thing to you guys for continually gangbanging and trying to derail my threads. BTW, before I left, I snuck into the Republican HQ, courtesy of a member who didnt like what was going on, and managed to see all the coordinated hit threads on people, which were being run by Hobbie and Hargreaves.Deegan said:He was banned with me, yes, can you believe it, I was banned as well?:lol:
It was for arguing with him, and I was happy to find this place, then he ended up here!:rofl
Oh well, I started my own crap, and so we meet again, what a small world, third rock from the sun, what a trip.
FinnMacCool said:cnredd's irrational hatred for Danarhea makes me want to puke, quite honestly.
GySgt said:How did you go from sick to angry so fast? These "mood" things are stupid and besides they aren't accommodating to everyone. Notice there isn't an "Arrogant" selection?
danarhea said:No, but there is a horny one. Be back in a while. Gotta go poke my wife
How did you go from sick to angry and then to cynical so fast? These "mood" things are stupid and besides they aren't accommodating to everyone. Notice there isn't an "Arrogant" selection? I feel so left out.
GySgt said:How did you go from sick to angry and then to cynical so fast? These "mood" things are stupid and besides they aren't accommodating to everyone. Notice there isn't an "Arrogant" selection? I feel so left out.
GySgt said:If only I could warn her some how. Poor lady.
Irrational?...I've posted data for everything I've mentioned...Whereas when YOU started this thread here in the Basement...AND this thread here...You showed NO research, evidence, or data to back up your accusations...FinnMacCool said:cnredd's irrational hatred for Danarhea makes me want to puke, quite honestly.
This shows your inability to read or just plain ignorance...FinnMacCool said:I like how a lot of you, particularily cnredd here, like to pretend they don't have agenda when, quite honestly, everyone has one. It's like George W Bush trying to call democrats partisan. Try to be more original next time cnredd.
cnredd said:Of course, most of us, if not all of us, have a slanted position when debating...we like people to hear our thoghts, and like it when they respond in kind...
Kiss ass!.......Originally posted by KCConservative:
OUTSTANDING POST, redd. Good job
So what are you saying, that you're not a leader?Originally posted by GySgt:
I always thought he started an enourmous amount of whine threads, but I had no idea it was at such a super human pace.
For the record:
GySgt
Number of posts = 4,268
Threads started = 0
Hey look!...My new chewtoy showed up!...aps said:Ahhhh, we're back in high school again. It's always fun to post on this board because it brings me back to what people were like in high school...maybe even middle school. :yawn:
aps said:Phoenix, you make a lot of conclusions, but I see NO facts whatsoever to back up your assertions. Ho hum. Bored.........
"Oh, but aps, I mentioned Chappaquidick when talking about Ted Kennedy. Now that is some real substance, right?"
LOL
aps said:Personally, I don't like seeing everyone beating up on my Navy Pride. What are we, in grade school?
Even though I don't like ptsdkid or FreeThinker, I would not be able to participate in bashing them in a thread like this.
Why is this necessary?
Navy Pride, no matter how ridiculous some of your statements are, no matter how much you criticize liberals, no matter how much you kiss George Bush's butt, I LIKE YOU!
:cheers:
aps said:Oh, Stace, ain't that the truth? FreeThinker has the brains of an ant. But we should feel sorry for him. Look at him--taking any shot he can to demean a liberal. LOL Those who are threatened by a particular type of person lash out at them--have you ever noticed that (see Ann Coulter's books)? If he was so confident in his beliefs, he wouldn't feel the need to put down others who don't agree with him.
There, there, FreeThinker. It will be okay. *pats FreeThinker on the head while feeling sorry for him*
danarhea said:And cnredd - Glad to know that I am such a thorn in your side that you have to whine down here about me.
FinnMacCool said:cnredd's irrational hatred for Danarhea makes me want to puke, quite honestly.
I like how a lot of you, particularily cnredd here, like to pretend they don't have agenda when, quite honestly, everyone has one. It's like George W Bush trying to call democrats partisan. Try to be more original next time cnredd.
Billo_Really said:Kiss ass!.......
cnredd said:Hey look!...My new chewtoy showed up!...
As is my usual procedure when it comes to you, aps, I like to show the forum members the hypocrisy of your posts...You make this so easy...
So when I use data to backup my claim that one member in particular is flooding the forum with their own agenda driven threads, you cry "high school"...Let's see if you've felt that way in OTHER posts making accusations towards other members here in this very Basement...
These are your EXACT words from the thread in the Basement entitled "Liberal Meltdown"...This is YOU responding to another member...
So then you come to a thread where EVERY assertion is backed up by facts, and yet you remain to be "bored"...
So just what will stop this boredom?...Facts or no facts, it just seems you just want to play the partisan game...
More proof?...Sure thing!...I don't think you can get anymore hypocritical than this...Guess you're not above the "high school" fray, eh aps?...
Now that was on January 17th...Let's see what you wrote on January 16th...
Yup...Nothing like thinking you'd never be able to participate...AFTER you participate one day earlier...:roll:
It was also nice to see that you were eerily silent when FinnMacCool started the two threads I mentioned earlier...You know...The two threads that were attacking people that DIDN'T think like you?...
Apparently, that OK...That's not "high school" in your book...:roll:
Billo_Really said:I like aps.
Who's bashing?...aps said:Great attitude, danarhea! People who feel the need to start a thread bashing someone are pathetic in my eyes. Usually those kind of people don't feel very good about themselves, and I should remind myself to be more tolerant. I would hate to dislike myself so much that I would take the time to start a thread badmouthing someone.
FinnMacCool said:I like how a lot of you, particularily cnredd here, like to pretend they don't have agenda when, quite honestly, everyone has one. It's like George W Bush trying to call democrats partisan. Try to be more original next time cnredd.
cnredd said:Of course, most of us, if not all of us, have a slanted position when debating...we like people to hear our thoghts, and like it when they respond in kind...
aps said:Wow. Great response. You are right. You clearly are open minded as to what may have transpired....
Thanks for your well-reasoned (for a change) response to me.
cnredd said:No problem...but "for a change"?!?...When have I done otherwise to you?...
cnredd said:I think some here get annoyed when I go the objective route on certain topics...The Liberals want to say, "Hey!...Let me rant and get this off my chest without obstruction!"...And the Conservatives want to say, "Hey!...You're suppose to be towing the party line!"...
Some think the debate is supposed to be "I yell at your party, then you yell at my party, then I yell at you, then you yell at me, then I'll change the subject, then you yell at me about something new, then I'll yell etc."...
They equally treat objectivity as a monkey wrench thrown into the debate...:shrug
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?