• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

You will see election fraud if you view REAL news, reporters who REALLY report it

I have been following REAL news on this election fraud: Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant

If you do t he same, you will see MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud

If you do not

you will not
Exactly. But not the way you mean.

Your entire reality comes from conservative media.

And does not come close to the consensus reality of the rest of the world.

I came to this site years ago to talk about the abuse of persuasion science making talk radio conservatives crazy. That it would not end well.

And here we are.
 
I have been following REAL news on this election fraud: Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant

If you do t he same, you will see MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud

If you do not

you will not

Where do these far right people come from?
tenor.gif
 
Tucker Carlson? Don't forget the quote from FOX's lawyers.

: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that Carlson is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "
 
Judge Ludwig denied the state’s claims that the campaign lacked standing. Instead, he gave the campaign the hearing they asked for — the opportunity to call witnesses and submit damning exhibits. Yet, when it got down to brass tacks, the morning of the hearing, it turned out there was no actual disagreement between the Trump team and Wisconsin officials about the pertinent facts of the case. The president’s counsel basically said: Never mind, we don’t need to present all our proof . . . we’ll just stipulate to all the relevant facts and argue legal principles.

..There was no there there. Despite telling the country for weeks that this was the most rigged election in history, the campaign didn’t think it was worth calling a single witness. Despite having the opportunity of a hearing before a Trump appointee who was willing to give the campaign ample opportunity to prove its case, the campaign said, “Never mind.”

It has become an article of faith among ardent Trump followers that the election was stolen. The president continues to insist that this is the case, and these flames were further fanned by 19 Republican-controlled state governments, along with 126 Republican members of Congress, who joined the meritless Texas lawsuit, tossed out by the Supreme Court on Friday. The rationalization behind that stunt was that the president has been denied his day in court. But every time a court offers him an opportunity to establish by proof what he is promoting by Twitter, Team Trump folds. Why is that?


What Trump and his minions are telling the public and what they have produced in court, ie, nothing, are two different things.

He's conning you.
 
I have been following REAL news on this election fraud: Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant

If you do t he same, you will see MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud

If you do not

you will not

Too bad Trump's lawyers did not have any of this to give to the judges and justices all across the country.
 

What Trump and his minions are telling the public and what they have produced in court, ie, nothing, are two different things.

He's conning you.

Thanks for posting this. I had been looking for an article about this case and could not find it again.
 
Conspiracy Theories is calling for this thread.
 
I have been following REAL news on this election fraud: Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant

If you do t he same, you will see MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud

If you do not

you will not

If you read Pravda, you will see MASSIVE evidence of the corruption in the decadent West and the glories of our Dear Leader.

If you do not.

You will not.

😂
 
Well, you sure can't trust any of the mainstream/Trump hating media. Hell, they won't even mention the evidence.

and those bastards in the mainstream/Trump hating media never mention the evidence for the earth being flat or the moon landing being fake....and there is a shit ton more evidence for those two things than for the election being stolen.
 
I have been following REAL news on this election fraud: Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant

If you do t he same, you will see MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud

If you do not

you will not

Dear God, man, get out of your echo chamber. Take a deep breath of air. It was an election - someone had to win, someone had to lose - just like every other election we've ever had.

You win some, you lose some. Face reality here... Trump never cracked 50% approval his entire time as President - why is so hard to accept that he lost? Hell, even Jimmy Carter got 50% approval as late as March of 1980.
 
Last edited:
I have been following REAL news on this election fraud: Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant

If you do t he same, you will see MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud

If you do not

you will not
No, that crap is best left to the low intellect imbeciles that line up to kiss a loser's ass.
 
As far as I can tell there's only been one case of verified voter fraud and that was some clown in PA who cast a vote for Simpleton in the name of his deceased mother.

Have any other examples you'd like to share?
 
I have been following REAL news on this election fraud: Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant

If you do t he same, you will see MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud

If you do not

you will not


Why with all this election fraud the Trump campaign can't win any court cases? Weak? Incompetent? Corrupt Trump judges?
 
I have been following REAL news on this election fraud: Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant

If you do t he same, you will see MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud

If you do not

you will not
What criteria did you use to determine Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant is "real" news?
 
I have been following REAL news on this election fraud: Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant

If you do t he same, you will see MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud

If you do not

you will not

If only Trump's legal would have submitted churchmilitant.com as evidence in court...
 
I have been following REAL news on this election fraud: Newsmax, NTD and Church Militant

If you do t he same, you will see MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud

If you do not

you will not
None of those are REAL NEWS.. more like FAKE NEWS... By the way there was no voter fraud no matter how many times you say it.
 
Back
Top Bottom