• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Yet another reason to vote Trump

90% of those deaths were people 55 years old and older. Almost 80% were over retirement age. How many of the people that have become unemployed do you think were under 55? Do you think it might have been a better idea to protect the vulnerable and let the lower risk people get back to work, so maybe that 8 million would not be 8 million?
You mean like not sending positive covid 19 patients to retirements homes like Cuomo did?
 
You mean like not sending positive covid 19 patients to retirements homes like Cuomo did?

Uh, yeah. Protecting the vulnerable is the opposite of what Cuomo did, right?
 
In spite of battle coronavirus, slobber-slinging Democratic, and user-bias debate/townhall moderators Trump has once again slam-dunked on the "he's ruined the economy mini-brains. Median wages for full time employees soared despite the boat anchor drag of coronavirus, power-drunk governors opening and closing their states and Biden's tax hike and frivolous spending platform.
This excites you because...? Mass layoffs dramatically impacted lower wage earners more than higher wage earners. When you remove people below the average, the average increases. This is not a positive economic development, it's a snapshot of an economic situation.
 
Infected Trump rallying the vulnerable is fine though.

That was their choice. They knew the risks, weighed them, and they chose to attend. If you cannot see the difference in that and infected people being forced into a nursing home full of vulnerable people, then I do not know what to tell you.
 
This excites you because...? Mass layoffs dramatically impacted lower wage earners more than higher wage earners. When you remove people below the average, the average increases. This is not a positive economic development, it's a snapshot of an economic situation.
And yet a huge percentage of "essential workers" are lower wage workers - you know; like Biden's "black lady stocking the grocery shelves". Oh, and this number is based on over 109 million full time workers so there aren't too many not being counted.
 
And yet a huge percentage of "essential workers" are lower wage workers - you know; like Biden's "black lady stocking the grocery shelves". Oh, and this number is based on over 109 million full time workers so there aren't too many not being counted.
Uhh...the math equation is not debatable.
 
Uhh...the math equation is not debatable.
What "math equation"? More like ideological assumptions desperately trying to downgrade any good news that occurs under Trump. Look around - notice who's actually working - They're not all top one-percenters. Realize that a lot of those laid off were also not full timers - which is what this report covers.
 
What "math equation"? More like ideological assumptions desperately trying to downgrade any good news that occurs under Trump. Look around - notice who's actually working - They're not all top one-percenters. Realize that a lot of those laid off were also not full timers - which is what this report covers.
The original statement was about increased earnings. When you remove more people that earn below the average than above, the average increases. Recent job losses impacted low income workers way more than higher wage workers. With fewer low wage earners in the equation the average earnings increase. Sounds to me like you are trying to say djt is responsible for wages going up. He is, because his covid response has resulted in massive job losses to low income Americans.
 
The original statement was about increased earnings. When you remove more people that earn below the average than above, the average increases. Recent job losses impacted low income workers way more than higher wage workers. With fewer low wage earners in the equation the average earnings increase. Sounds to me like you are trying to say djt is responsible for wages going up. He is, because his covid response has resulted in massive job losses to low income Americans.
LOL, keep trying. Your desperation is funny. Right now we're looking at unemployment levels close to what they were in mid to late Obama era. Based. At 7.9% that is about 4% higher than when the Pandemic started - hardly the number to significantly alter media wages for full timers.
 
Back
Top Bottom