Based solely on what was on the sites you posted, no.
States shouldn't, I don't think, decide what the law will say about abortion and gay rights and suchlike; imagine if that had been the case with segregation. That by itself is a deal-breaker, I think, but not taxing corporations that use hydrogen in lieu of fossil fuels seals his fate, to my mind. I'm all for moving to alternative energy sources and I'm all for tax incentives if they'll get us there, but I get the feeling that if ever we let corporations stop paying taxes altogether, we'd never get them to start again.
Too, consider this sentence from his website: "We need to be fair and give all American's the same advantage that the upper class has been given." My family and I are not exactly rich, but unfortunately we still wouldn't benefit from his idea. We're Americans, not American's. Bad punctuation is a turn-off.
