The notion that one could see a subsonic ball of x-rays belies a lack of knowledge of physics that is astounding in it's level of ignorance.
The notion that one could see a subsonic ball of x-rays belies a lack of knowledge of physics that is astounding in it's level of ignorance.
Oh, and that "Hani maneuver," a less-than-standard turn rate and then straight line dive. Totally impossible, Deuce doesn't know anything about aerodynamics! Diving in a straight line is an incredible feat of aviating! Hitting a target several times the size of a normal runway crossing requires immense skill!
Deuce, who literally taught aerodynamics classes, wouldn't know anything about that.
For the layman: crashing is easy. Any idiot can mash a plane nose-first into a runway. Doing it softly is precision work.
The notion that one could see a subsonic ball of x-rays belies a lack of knowledge of physics that is astounding in it's level of ignorance.
That has nothing to do with your ignorance of physics and aviation. Now, about your alternative explanation of the events of 911......Yes, just like in 1400 the notion that the earth is the center of the universe was also astounding in its ignorance, or that the earth was actually a globe. Astounding. :lamo
Yes, just like in 1400 the notion that the earth is the center of the universe was also astounding in its ignorance, or that the earth was actually a globe. Astounding. :lamo
A comparison that is both hysterical and utterly confounding in its arrogance. You're going to compare yourself to the pioneers of science? Ok, Copernicus. Show us this evidence you've gathered that will upend virtually all of physics. This could win you, like, all the nobel prizes. Disprove everything about light.
Geocentricism wasn't a scientific concept. People hadn't gathered evidence to test the idea. They hadn't made any hypotheses or predictions based on it. They just assumed it to be true. The flat earth model is a religious idea, observations had disproved that notion since... like, Plato?
To compare those situations to the electromagnetic spectrum is just desperate. The speed of light isn't some gut feeling people went with because they'd never critically assessed it. The visible spectrum isn't based on anyone's religion.
Look at a rainbow and tell me where the x-rays are. Inner or outer edge? In the middle?
You've gone with some whoppers in the past, Thoreau, but this here I think creates a new conspiracy theory. Is Thoreau72 really a truther at all, or is this some elaborate hoax?
That has nothing to do with your ignorance of physics and aviation. Now, about your alternative explanation of the events of 911......
If you prefer the science of 1400 then that would explain your utter nonsense concerning modern phtsics.Yes, just like in 1400 the notion that the earth is the center of the universe was also astounding in its ignorance, or that the earth was actually a globe. Astounding. :lamo
If you prefer the science of 1400 then that would explain your utter nonsense concerning modern phtsics.
Should I take seriously the comments of one unable to spell the word? I think not.eace
Are you saying you have never made a spelling error on this forum?eace
Why don't you challenge Tony on the details of the controlled demolition of the WTC buildings. Tony has stated he does not believe "nukes" were used. You believe nukes were used.
It would be interesting to see what each of you have to say.
It is interesting that after 16+ years there is no one concise controlled demolition explanation. Maybe someday the CD people will be able to prove what they believe, but I doubt it.
Should I take seriously the comments of one unable to spell the word? I think not.eace
It didn't happen so how can they prove the different its?
So now the guy who thinks hitting the world's largest office building is an amazing feat of aviation thinks specific floors were targeted by aircraft.
I'm still waiting for your evidence that overturns virtually all of physics by suggesting x-rays in the atmosphere can be visible, and subsonic.
Should I take you seriously if you can't do that? I think not.eace
I'm still waiting for you to ask an intelligent question. Happy Holidays. Thankfully I'm not holding my breath.
I'm still waiting for you to ask an intelligent question. Happy Holidays. Thankfully I'm not holding my breath.
"How can someone possibly see x-rays, and how can light travel at subsonic speeds" are unintelligent questions? Really? Pointing out basic laws of physics that the entire world rests upon is an unintelligent argument?
Ok, professor. I'm so unintelligent, you're so wise. Tell me how x-rays can be seen with the human eye, and tell me how they would travel at subsonic speeds.
Neither you nor I were involved in the Star Wars Initiative under Reagan. I was not, and I assume you were not.
Therefore, neither of us are privy to what was learned there.
On this issue, I made it clear from my first post on that I was offering speculation and theory, as were the more informed writers at VT.
You misrepresent my position by posting that I was certain about this. That misrepresentation is typical for you Deuce, and your brave posts against torture do not quite compensate for your dishonest style of posting here.
Maybe it was an xray laser, maybe it was not. Is that too subtle for you to understand?
More importantly, are you honest enough to admit your mischaracterization? Likely not.
No Deuce, it wasn't too subtle, but it was typical of your wandering mind and nonsensical posts.
"You can't see something outside the visible spectrum" isn't nonsense.
Xrays, by definition, aren't visible. Don't speculate on photon weapons when you aren't even familiar with the electromagnetic spectrum.
I'm not sure what you mean, and I never memorized all the places it's happened over the world, even here in the US. In several, the buildings were fully or substantially in flame, and one of them burned for almost 24 hours I think.
None of them were struck by airplanes, but all were very engaged in fire. None collapsed. Many were put back into service.
The notion that the fires alone at WTC would cause what was finally observed, is preposterous.
No Deuce, it wasn't too subtle, but it was typical of your wandering mind and nonsensical posts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?