• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you vote for an Atheist?

Would you vote for or consider voting for an Atheist for any public office?

  • Yes

    Votes: 62 89.9%
  • No

    Votes: 7 10.1%

  • Total voters
    69
 
The psychological theory is always there but it doesn't feel that way to me.

when we have hope, we're more likely to act ... praying to a God works for you and that's cool ... but please don't tell people who don't believe in God that they don't have a moral compass ... seriously, think about it ...
 
Umm if you believe there is no god how can you be Christian?

*edit* the golden rule was not an invention of Jesus either it has been around much longer and espoused by many religions

Golden Rule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki shmiki :lol:I'm using Judeo Christian values because that is what I am most familiar with but good point that other religions profess the same values.
 
Wiki shmiki :lol:I'm using Judeo Christian values because that is what I am most familiar with but good point that other religions profess the same values.

non religious philosophies as well
 
 
non religious philosophies as well

It's because the majority of morality that evolved along side human society, in part to help that society run better, can be rather standard across board. There are regional differences and some big breaks with traditional morality in societies that had a different evolutionary path. But generally what helps society prosper and function can be quite similar across the board.
 

People interpret the bible in different ways, I am not a fundamentalist bible thumper, the book has been altered to much by man to take literally. You have to look for the root messages in it.
 

well put ...
 
People interpret the bible in different ways, I am not a fundamentalist bible thumper, the book has been altered to much by man to take literally. You have to look for the root messages in it.

I think there are quite a few very nice messages within the bible and there's quite a bit of shared morality, but to be Christian I'm pretty sure you have to believe in Christ, and not just as some dude but THE dude. Seems part and parcel to the whole thing.
 
when we have hope, we're more likely to act ... praying to a God works for you and that's cool ... but please don't tell people who don't believe in God that they don't have a moral compass ... seriously, think about it ...

I'll mull it over. I'm just going by atheist I know IRL but that of course is anecdotal evidence.
 
As long as they're not militant about it, sure.

(I wouldn't want a militant religious person, either.)
 
Would I vote for an atheist? I probably have already.


They just couldn't come right out and say so in public.
 
 
Given the fact that "Christian" leaders all around the world have taken bribes, had affairs, targeted innocents, rigged elections etc...Yeh I think i'm ok with an Atheist
 
I'll mull it over. I'm just going by atheist I know IRL but that of course is anecdotal evidence.

thank you ... let me add that although I'm an agnostic, in my life some of the most extraordinary people I've known have been deeply religious people who have dedicated their lives to helping others in the name of a deity, and they've also managed to respect and embrace those who didn't believe as they did, including atheists ... religion is a very personal thing and that's one reason I don't want it in politics ... when presidential candidates have to discuss their religious beliefs with some pastor, it turns my stomach ... I don't need to know their religious beliefs, just their positions on a wide range of issues ...

I took a trip to the Amzon once and they took us to a meeting with some missionaries who had brought some modern things, including medicine, to Indians that made their lives better ... that was good, but it came with a price tag -- the Indians had to convert to Christianity and the missionaries had them believing that there was a connection between Christianity and these "things" ... I got into a heated discussion with them ... there was one funny part ... one of our guides was a guy from Belgium and he whispered to me that I was wasting my time, but at one point, one of the missionaries said that these Indians were afraid to go out at night before they had arrived ... at this point the guide had had enough, and blurted out - "People in New York are afraid to go out at night too!"
 

No. Atheist are not fit to hold office. Our rights are from God. And since our rights come from God man cannot take them away. But when people stop believing that our rights come from God they start believing that our rights are "granted" by the state. And if the state can "grant" rights it can take those rights away. Atheist will have no philosophical aversion to stripping us our our individual, God-given rights.
 
Given the fact that "Christian" leaders all around the world have taken bribes, had affairs, targeted innocents, rigged elections etc...Yeh I think i'm ok with an Atheist
Change that to "religious" and I'm with you. There's nothing distinctly Christian about being corrupt.
 
Not a book of rules but an openness to a higher power that can help guide your decisions.

You mean like Aztecs who sacrificed children to please their gods?
 

Well what if an atheist believes in natural rights then, is it OK to vote for them?
 
Well what if an atheist believes in natural rights then, is it OK to vote for them?

The Declaration of Independence
“When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impelthem to the separation.”

The term “the law of nature” was a very specific term coined by Sir EdwardCoke…

Sir Edward Coke (1552-1634)
“The law of nature is that which God at the time of creation of the nature ofman infused into his heart, for his preservation and direction…the moral law,called the law of nature.”

This same term was later used by William Blackstone who wrote a law textbook. If you were a lawyer, as was Thomas Jefferson, you studied Blackstone.

William Blackstone
“…as man depends absolutely upon his Maker for everything, it is necessary that he should, in all points, conform to his Maker’s will. This will of his Maker is called the law of nature…This law of nature…dictated by God Himself is, ofcourse, superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe,in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are of any validity incontrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive all their force, and all their authority…from this original.”

“Upon these two foundations, the law of nature and the law of revelation,depend all human laws; that is to say, no human laws should be suffered to contradict these.”
- Commentaries on the Law (A lawtextbook / 2,500 copies sold in America prior to the Revolutionary War)

"Natural law" is God's law.
 

Yes, so you would have no problem voting for an atheist who accepted natural rights. Yes?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…