• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

World’s first nuclear fusion plant being built in US to power Microsoft data centers

Chock Full o Nuts

Dungeon Master
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
8,623
Reaction score
9,995
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right

Construction of world's 1st nuclear fusion plant starts in Washington

Helion Energy aims to produce low-cost, clean electric energy from the Washington-based fusion plant by 2028.
interestingengineering.com
Helion will continue to work through the remaining steps in the permitting process to construct and operate a commercial fusion power plant on the site.
Click to expand...
Shouldn't all the ducks be in a row first before breaking ground on such a thing.

That's hot!

I thought that was still the case. So they are building something that is going to use more energy than they will get out of it? Makes perfect sense.
I assume this 'derived from water' is smashing hydrogen molecules together?
 
Rain follows the plow.
 
Is there any serious argument to be had against nuclear energy?
 

Yes it is.
 
TypicalRussian said:
Is there any serious argument to be had against nuclear energy?
Click to expand...
Yes, plenty. The economics of repeated failed nuclear power projects has left that industry on U.S. taxpayer life support. Millions of utility ratepayers in the Southeast are still paying, each month on their bills, billions of dollars for failed nuclear projects that will never produce squat. No new nuclear power plant construction has begun in decades without U.S. taxpayer financing. No insurance company will underwrite a liability policy for a nuclear power plant - only we taxpayers pay for that. Nuclear waste still has no solution after 80 years of temporary storage and broken promises for a permanent waste depository.

Nuclear power is a failed experiment despite the promises made beginning in the mid-1900s. To date, the economics still don't work. We could deploy gigawatts of solar energy by next year, and every year, while waiting the average 10-11 years it takes to build a nuclear power plant.
 
"Derived from water" probably refers to Deuterium fusion. Deuterium is a stable, heavy isotope of hydrogen that can be found naturally occurring in water.
 
TypicalRussian said:
Is there any serious argument to be had against nuclear energy?
Click to expand...

No, but there is an argument to be had against relying on fusion energy, mainly that nobody has actually made it work yet.
 
Volunteer said:
We could deploy gigawatts of solar energy by next year, and every year, while waiting the average 10-11 years it takes to build a nuclear power plant.
Click to expand...

In case you weren't duly informed, solar only works when the sun is up, which is about 8-9 hours a day in the Winter, and peak electricity usage occurs well after peak sun.
 
I have to say, I am very skeptical of this.

No one has built a working fusion reactor. They've promised to have a fusion reactor working Real Soon Now since 2014. And they're going to be done by 2028?

I think they're just saying this stuff to raise capital. I have no idea why Microsoft is lending its name to this.
 
Noodlegawd said:
In case you weren't duly informed, solar only works when the sun is up, which is about 8-9 hours a day in the Winter, and peak electricity usage occurs well after peak sun.
Click to expand...
What fuel source do you use for air conditioning? When utilities are straining under the summer afternoon load, when brownouts are looming, "when the sun is up?" Huge opportunity for solar here.
 
Volunteer said:
What fuel source do you use for air conditioning? When utilities are straining under the summer afternoon load, when brownouts are looming, "when the sun is up?" Huge opportunity for solar here.
Click to expand...
I have solar and I haven't paid an electric bill in months. Its great. Especially since the cost of electric steadily rises.
 
Gordy327 said:
I have solar and I haven't paid an electric bill in months. Its great. Especially since the cost of electric steadily rises.
Click to expand...
I haven't paid for electricity in years. We get heating, cooling, hot tub, EV charging. The $450/mo we save will pay off our initial investment in a few more years.
 
Volunteer said:
I haven't paid for electricity in years. We get heating, cooling, hot tub, EV charging. The $450/mo we save will pay off our initial investment in a few more years.
Click to expand...
Once the solar investment is paid off, its basically like getting free money every month. It adds up over time too.
 
Fusion energy reactors are definitely the energy source of the future ... if they find out ways to produce significantly more energy than what is needed to generate it.

Fusion reactors don't have the nuclear waste that is needed to be stored from nuclear reactors and also don't "melt down" like in Chernobyl or Fukushima.

Once fusion reactors are up and running, it will put coal/oil/gas completely out of business and will power the renewable energy transport systems of the future - making the planet fully green and electric.

Gas powered cars will be seen as something like a stone digging tool from a stone-age period then.
 
Tender Branson said:
Fusion energy reactors are definitely the energy source of the future ... if they find out ways to produce significantly more energy than what is needed to generate it.
Click to expand...

Tender Branson said:
Fusion reactors don't have the nuclear waste that is needed to be stored from nuclear reactors and also don't "melt down" like in Chernobyl or Fukushima.
Click to expand...
True, fusing hydrogen into helium only creates more helium, a safe and relatively safe and an inert element.

But I wonder what would happen when the 'magnetic containment bottle' containing that 100 million degrees Celsius material has a gap or a breaches in that magnetic field.
With the amount of energy that would be released, would it be like hydrogen bomb going off?

 
Volunteer said:
What fuel source do you use for air conditioning? When utilities are straining under the summer afternoon load, when brownouts are looming, "when the sun is up?" Huge opportunity for solar here.
Click to expand...

Air conditioning only accounts for around 10% of energy consumption in the US, and a substantial portion, if not most, of that occurs after solar generation is minimal or nonexistent.
 
Noodlegawd said:
Air conditioning only accounts for around 10% of energy consumption in the US, and a substantial portion, if not most, of that occurs after solar generation is minimal or nonexistent.
Click to expand...
Some huge fossil fuel plants have been built just to accommodate seasonal peak loads of electricity use. "Only" ten percent of all U.S. energy consumption for A/C is still a massive number. And I disagree that most energy consumed for that occurs after dark.
 

Peak electricity demand occurs around 6pm, when solar production is more or less nonexistent. Our grid needs to have capacity to satisfy peak demand. Without massive grid storage (good luck with that), solar contributes almost nothing to that. The best, safest, and most reliable way to do that without emitting CO2 is nuclear.

You can lead a duck to water....

 
Last edited:

No, not remotely. Loss of containment could possibly damage the containment vessel or "magnetic bottle", perhaps, but often doesn't even do that. No explosions. No Three Mile Island radiation leaks.
 
Tender Branson said:
Fusion energy reactors are definitely the energy source of the future...
Click to expand...
Yes, if -- as you noted -- we can get them to work.

They definitely don't work yet. They definitely won't be ready for prime time in 2028. And this company has promised fusion in 4 years since 2014.

Fusion power may be real someday. But for now, this sounds like a scam.
 
Goshin said:
No, not remotely. Loss of containment could possibly damage the containment vessel or "magnetic bottle", perhaps, but often doesn't even do that. No explosions. No Three Mile Island radiation leaks.
Click to expand...
Err.
What's going to happen when 100 million degrees Celsius material escapes its magnetic bottle, which has failed or lost power, and that material comes into contact with matter that is at room temperature?
Seems to me that's going to led to a violent reaction, just on a temperature differential basis, and also because hydrogen is very reactive and highly flammable.

Why would 100 million degrees Celsius material coming on contact with room temperature matter NOT be a violent reaction?
 
Noodlegawd said:
The best, safest, and most reliable way to do that without emitting CO2 is nuclear.
Click to expand...
If nuclear was so safe then why won't insurance companies write liability policies for power plants? The liability, and it is very large, falls on we taxpayers to take the risks.

Nuclear power is on taxpayer life support. The economics of it are so bad that no private company has broken ground on a nuclear power plant, without federal government guarantees, in decades.
 
Thats not the first fusion plant sorry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…