- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 69,396
- Reaction score
- 53,825
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
From Teresa Shook's personal post on the matter:
And to that I can only respond:
Teresa Shook, you never should have stepped away. You let parasites infiltrate and capture your movement. I hope you have learned a valuable lesson. The lesson is, there is NO SUCH THING AS DECENTRALIZED LEADERSHIP.
If you don't ever "get" anything else, get THIS:
"Decentralized leadership" isn't leadership, it is anarchy and anarchy is an open invitation to those who would capture and take over your movement and spend your political capital in ways which will harm you and your ideals.
---To be brutally honest, decentralized leadership is a fancy word that means LAZINESS.
It is ultimately a contradiction in terms.
"Bob Bland, Tamika Mallory, Linda Sarsour and Carmen Perez of Women’s March, Inc. have steered the Movement away from its true course. I have waited, hoping they would right the ship. But they have not.[...]
As Women’s March founder, I am stepping up to bring focus back to the Unity Principles on which our movement began, and with the support of all of those who marched and have continued to march, I pledge to support grassroots, decentralized leadership promoting a safe, worldwide community devoid of hate speech, bigotry and racism."
And to that I can only respond:
Teresa Shook, you never should have stepped away. You let parasites infiltrate and capture your movement. I hope you have learned a valuable lesson. The lesson is, there is NO SUCH THING AS DECENTRALIZED LEADERSHIP.
If you don't ever "get" anything else, get THIS:
"Decentralized leadership" isn't leadership, it is anarchy and anarchy is an open invitation to those who would capture and take over your movement and spend your political capital in ways which will harm you and your ideals.
---To be brutally honest, decentralized leadership is a fancy word that means LAZINESS.
It is ultimately a contradiction in terms.