• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

WMD Commission to Release Tough Findings

Squawker

Professor
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,314
Reaction score
4
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
It doesn’t look like we will learn too much from this report. The fox has the power to classify evidence.

Mar 24, 6:32 PM (ET)

By KATHERINE SHRADER
WASHINGTON (AP) - A presidential commission investigating weapons of mass destruction is highly critical of U.S. intelligence agencies' performance on Iran, North Korea and Libya and attempts to lay out what went wrong on Iraq, according to individuals familiar with the findings.
-snip-
Individuals familiar with the report, who spoke only on the condition of anonymity, said the commission devoted significant time to dissecting what went wrong on the Iraq intelligence, including many issues that have been examined by internal government investigations and the Senate Intelligence Committee.
-snip-
Final drafts of the commission's report are now being circulated among the intelligence agencies for declassification. Historically, they have tried to use that process to keep secret some of the most embarrassing or critical details of investigative findings.
It's unclear how much of this report, which is expected to run hundreds of pages, will be available to the public. Commission spokesman Larry McQuillan said commissioners intend to release as much as possible.
Source
 

Schweddy

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
12,177
Reaction score
6,280
Location
Plano, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
I wonder if this will debunk anything in the Duelfer Report?
 

Pacridge

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 14, 2004
Messages
3,918
Reaction score
9
Location
Pacific Northwest US
vauge said:
I wonder if this will debunk anything in the Duelfer Report?
What? This new commission is suddenly going to find Saddam had Nukes, Bio and Chem weapons. That could happen. Or you could just keep watching Fox. I heard them say it again this weekend. They slip it in at just about every opportunity. Course they never back it up with any facts or mention any of these factual sources. They just make statements like: "we all know Saddam was using these funds to support his chemical weapons program." Which I heard a reporter say at 8:25 Sat. Morn. This is why so many Neo-cons. still believe he had WMD's.
 

anomaly

Anti-Capitalist
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
1,020
Reaction score
6
Location
IN
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Pacridge said:
What? This new commission is suddenly going to find Saddam had Nukes, Bio and Chem weapons. That could happen. Or you could just keep watching Fox. I heard them say it again this weekend. They slip it in at just about every opportunity. Course they never back it up with any facts or mention any of these factual sources. They just make statements like: "we all know Saddam was using these funds to support his chemical weapons program." Which I heard a reporter say at 8:25 Sat. Morn. This is why so many Neo-cons. still believe he had WMD's.
It has come to my attention that the Bush administration actually "hammered", as one report put it, intel regarding Saddam Hussein and WMDs out of the CIA. It seems that this war was started through lying, and nothing else. Quite similar to Vietnam, if you think about it (Gulf of Tonkin...).
 
Top Bottom