• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

With Each Injunction, The Courts Become An Unelected Ruling Class🧨🧨🧨

Trumpetman

Conditional Statements are not Direct Statements.
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2024
Messages
5,531
Reaction score
1,785
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other

America increasingly lives under a Judicial Oligarchy, where the district court system that functions below the Supreme Court has assumed power far beyond its intended limited role, subverting the executive and legislative branches to impose a policy agenda dictated not by elected representatives but by unelected judges.

According to a Fox News report, nationwide injunctions against President Trump’s first administration accounted for more than half of the total injunctions ordered against the federal government since 1963.

Worse still, President Trump’s second term has shockingly endured more federal court injunctions in his first 60 days than Joe Biden did during his four years in office and Barack Obama during his entire eight-year presidency.

This obstruction is far from what the framers intended.

It is becoming clear that when the ACLU for example keeps taking cases happening in Texas and files them in DC where they magically keep "randomly" selected with a certain judge (who has now "magically" picked up FOUR such cases) that it is ignoring the venue and finding the district judges who believe they get to stop the President.

The cost of ignoring the American people will be great. Checks and balances go BOTH ways.

As these two cases illustrate, the courts have increasingly shifted from their primary role as interpreters of the law to that of legislators. This has fundamentally eroded the separation of powers and transformed the judiciary from a neutral arbiter into a force for liberal activism.

This disturbing pattern of judicial overreach further undermines our already fragile representative democracy and exposes the oligarchy beneath. Instead of three co-equal branches of government, none superior to the other, we now have an unchecked judiciary that can override the executive and legislative branches whenever elected officials pursue policies that conflict with the ideological preferences of the liberal establishment.

All branches are equal and if interpretation is not execution or legislation. The courts must stay in their lane and know their role or it will be stripped back to the bare minimum of what they should within their branch.

If the deliberate legal obstruction of Trump’s presidency continues without significant pushback, either by winning legal appeals, impeaching partisan justices, eliminating some federal courts, openly defying court orders, or the Supreme Court granting the Trump administration’s request to narrow the scope of the district court injunctions, the judiciary will effectively cement itself as America’s unelected ruling class.

The courts have acted this way in the past. A good example was Dred Scott. Any court worrying about the legitimacy of the judiciary must remember that Congress can reconfigue these district courts and also remove and if necessary impeach judges. The President can simply do exactly what Joe Biden did and that is magically not move forward on matters like say... student loan collection. The President can also pardon anyone the court seeks to hold in contempt.

If the courts want to go to war as unelected ruling class and defenders of the deep state swamp, they'd better be prepared because they will need to realize they are one branch going against two and in the end they will lose. They won't just lose because these district judges with an agenda are wrong. They will lose because in the end the Congress and President can simply choose to reassign, pack, legislate past and pardon past the courts if they care to take it that far.

The hunters will again become the hunted if they can't figure it out.
 
What has changed? They've always been a ruling class in our nation (co-equal branches and all) and only some are elected.

I guess Trump should have picked "better" judges, or stuck with legal activities.
 



It is becoming clear that when the ACLU for example keeps taking cases happening in Texas and files them in DC where they magically keep "randomly" selected with a certain judge (who has now "magically" picked up FOUR such cases) that it is ignoring the venue and finding the district judges who believe they get to stop the President.

The cost of ignoring the American people will be great. Checks and balances go BOTH ways.



All branches are equal and if interpretation is not execution or legislation. The courts must stay in their lane and know their role or it will be stripped back to the bare minimum of what they should within their branch.



The courts have acted this way in the past. A good example was Dred Scott. Any court worrying about the legitimacy of the judiciary must remember that Congress can reconfigue these district courts and also remove and if necessary impeach judges. The President can simply do exactly what Joe Biden did and that is magically not move forward on matters like say... student loan collection. The President can also pardon anyone the court seeks to hold in contempt.

If the courts want to go to war as unelected ruling class and defenders of the deep state swamp, they'd better be prepared because they will need to realize they are one branch going against two and in the end they will lose. They won't just lose because these district judges with an agenda are wrong. They will lose because in the end the Congress and President can simply choose to reassign, pack, legislate past and pardon past the courts if they care to take it that far.

The hunters will again become the hunted if they can't figure it out.

So are you arguing that the Executive Branch should have the power to overrule the Judiciary ?
 
All branches are equal and if interpretation is not execution or legislation. The courts must stay in their lane and know their role or it will be stripped back to the bare minimum of what they should within their branch.

A court is obliged to enjoin an action when a compelling legal argument is presented that justifies it.

Why can't Trump's team defend their actions as legal?
 
“A majority of the American people elected a president … “


No, they didn’t. And that’s not even how the Executive is chosen, anyway.


The author of the piece is a ****ing moron.
 



It is becoming clear that when the ACLU for example keeps taking cases happening in Texas and files them in DC where they magically keep "randomly" selected with a certain judge (who has now "magically" picked up FOUR such cases) that it is ignoring the venue and finding the district judges who believe they get to stop the President.

The cost of ignoring the American people will be great. Checks and balances go BOTH ways.



All branches are equal and if interpretation is not execution or legislation. The courts must stay in their lane and know their role or it will be stripped back to the bare minimum of what they should within their branch.



The courts have acted this way in the past. A good example was Dred Scott. Any court worrying about the legitimacy of the judiciary must remember that Congress can reconfigue these district courts and also remove and if necessary impeach judges. The President can simply do exactly what Joe Biden did and that is magically not move forward on matters like say... student loan collection. The President can also pardon anyone the court seeks to hold in contempt.

If the courts want to go to war as unelected ruling class and defenders of the deep state swamp, they'd better be prepared because they will need to realize they are one branch going against two and in the end they will lose. They won't just lose because these district judges with an agenda are wrong. They will lose because in the end the Congress and President can simply choose to reassign, pack, legislate past and pardon past the courts if they care to take it that far.

The hunters will again become the hunted if they can't figure it out.
Total nonsense.

They are ruling on matters of law and constitutionality.

That is their constitutionally designated job.

The president does not get to overule the judicial branch on questions of law and constitutionality.

For christs sake, take a civics class.
 



It is becoming clear that when the ACLU for example keeps taking cases happening in Texas and files them in DC where they magically keep "randomly" selected with a certain judge (who has now "magically" picked up FOUR such cases) that it is ignoring the venue and finding the district judges who believe they get to stop the President.

The cost of ignoring the American people will be great. Checks and balances go BOTH ways.



All branches are equal and if interpretation is not execution or legislation. The courts must stay in their lane and know their role or it will be stripped back to the bare minimum of what they should within their branch.



The courts have acted this way in the past. A good example was Dred Scott. Any court worrying about the legitimacy of the judiciary must remember that Congress can reconfigue these district courts and also remove and if necessary impeach judges. The President can simply do exactly what Joe Biden did and that is magically not move forward on matters like say... student loan collection. The President can also pardon anyone the court seeks to hold in contempt.

If the courts want to go to war as unelected ruling class and defenders of the deep state swamp, they'd better be prepared because they will need to realize they are one branch going against two and in the end they will lose. They won't just lose because these district judges with an agenda are wrong. They will lose because in the end the Congress and President can simply choose to reassign, pack, legislate past and pardon past the courts if they care to take it that far.

The hunters will again become the hunted if they can't figure it out.
The Constitution makes the judicial branch equal in power to the executive and Congress. They are charged with upholding our laws and the Constitution. Trump cannot overrule the judicial branch he does not have the power to do that. You should tell Trump to give up all his attacks on judges if you believe in our Constitution but the truth is you do not.
 
Remember during the Obama years, when Conservatives used to scream "THE CONSTITUTION!".

Yeah I remember that.

We always knew it was a lie.

They want authoritarianism, as long they think its being done to people they don't like.
 
More and more lately Righties have been in bad need of their blankies.
Whether it's the courts, the media, average Americans, if any of 'em criticize Trump, OMG...................................

1743191367289.webp
 



It is becoming clear that when the ACLU for example keeps taking cases happening in Texas and files them in DC where they magically keep "randomly" selected with a certain judge (who has now "magically" picked up FOUR such cases) that it is ignoring the venue and finding the district judges who believe they get to stop the President.

The cost of ignoring the American people will be great. Checks and balances go BOTH ways.



All branches are equal and if interpretation is not execution or legislation. The courts must stay in their lane and know their role or it will be stripped back to the bare minimum of what they should within their branch.



The courts have acted this way in the past. A good example was Dred Scott. Any court worrying about the legitimacy of the judiciary must remember that Congress can reconfigue these district courts and also remove and if necessary impeach judges. The President can simply do exactly what Joe Biden did and that is magically not move forward on matters like say... student loan collection. The President can also pardon anyone the court seeks to hold in contempt.

If the courts want to go to war as unelected ruling class and defenders of the deep state swamp, they'd better be prepared because they will need to realize they are one branch going against two and in the end they will lose. They won't just lose because these district judges with an agenda are wrong. They will lose because in the end the Congress and President can simply choose to reassign, pack, legislate past and pardon past the courts if they care to take it that far.

The hunters will again become the hunted if they can't figure it out.
This is a good thing because the boobs you elect are taking you straight into the crapper.
 
1743192471180.webp

BB always on point.
 



It is becoming clear that when the ACLU for example keeps taking cases happening in Texas and files them in DC where they magically keep "randomly" selected with a certain judge (who has now "magically" picked up FOUR such cases) that it is ignoring the venue and finding the district judges who believe they get to stop the President.

The cost of ignoring the American people will be great. Checks and balances go BOTH ways.



All branches are equal and if interpretation is not execution or legislation. The courts must stay in their lane and know their role or it will be stripped back to the bare minimum of what they should within their branch.



The courts have acted this way in the past. A good example was Dred Scott. Any court worrying about the legitimacy of the judiciary must remember that Congress can reconfigue these district courts and also remove and if necessary impeach judges. The President can simply do exactly what Joe Biden did and that is magically not move forward on matters like say... student loan collection. The President can also pardon anyone the court seeks to hold in contempt.

If the courts want to go to war as unelected ruling class and defenders of the deep state swamp, they'd better be prepared because they will need to realize they are one branch going against two and in the end they will lose. They won't just lose because these district judges with an agenda are wrong. They will lose because in the end the Congress and President can simply choose to reassign, pack, legislate past and pardon past the courts if they care to take it that far.

The hunters will again become the hunted if they can't figure it out.

As if two aren't playing the same game.
 



It is becoming clear that when the ACLU for example keeps taking cases happening in Texas and files them in DC where they magically keep "randomly" selected with a certain judge (who has now "magically" picked up FOUR such cases) that it is ignoring the venue and finding the district judges who believe they get to stop the President.

The cost of ignoring the American people will be great. Checks and balances go BOTH ways.



All branches are equal and if interpretation is not execution or legislation. The courts must stay in their lane and know their role or it will be stripped back to the bare minimum of what they should within their branch.



The courts have acted this way in the past. A good example was Dred Scott. Any court worrying about the legitimacy of the judiciary must remember that Congress can reconfigue these district courts and also remove and if necessary impeach judges. The President can simply do exactly what Joe Biden did and that is magically not move forward on matters like say... student loan collection. The President can also pardon anyone the court seeks to hold in contempt.

If the courts want to go to war as unelected ruling class and defenders of the deep state swamp, they'd better be prepared because they will need to realize they are one branch going against two and in the end they will lose. They won't just lose because these district judges with an agenda are wrong. They will lose because in the end the Congress and President can simply choose to reassign, pack, legislate past and pardon past the courts if they care to take it that far.

The hunters will again become the hunted if they can't figure it out.
Read a respected source for editorial from now on.

MAGA crap rots the mind.
 
Oh, seems so long ago when dopey conservatives wore tri-cornered hats and carried around little pocket constitutions.

Now they want a new King George.

Conservatism has always been authoritarian, fascism is just the mask off version of it. The cosplay shit was just that, the only actual freedoms right-wingers believe in is guns and the right of the powerful to oppress the marginalized.
 
Conservatism has always been authoritarian, fascism is just the mask off version of it. The cosplay shit was just that, the only actual freedoms right-wingers believe in is guns and the right of the powerful to oppress the marginalized.
It has been, and I doubt they even realize their hypocrisy or that they are the "bad guys".
 
Back
Top Bottom