• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wisconsin Cops Murder Black Man

Must. Follow. Orders.

Tell me, does that only apply to blacks or do you want everyone to bend over for authority?

Did you have an answer? If not please leave my math class. We need facts for the lefties claim. I will then use math to show just how dumb leftists are.
 
Did you have an answer? If not please leave my math class. We need facts for the lefties claim. I will then use math to show just how dumb leftists are.

I just get a kick out of AlphaOmega saying we should kowtow to authority or accept being shot in the back.
 
I just get a kick out of AlphaOmega saying we should kowtow to authority or accept being shot in the back.

There you have it folks definitive proof that lefties want to incite you into disobeying the police. The left needs black men to fight the police and get shot in order to advance their political agendas. This^ is why Americans hate leftists. They are filthy little weaklings that use minorities deaths as food for their DNC insatiable grasp for power.
 
Yes, yes...cops are such ******s that they need to shoot people in the back because they didn't know that "he was not going to grab a gun"...

You should try being an officer. I doubt you would make it but, everyday you walk out door you hope you will be walking back in later. The moment you let you guard down the next time your family might see you is in the hospital or worse. You have no idea what it is like to put you life on the line everyday, especially for those who do not appreciate it.
 
That doesn’t constitute getting shot in the back either

Yeah...yeah it absolutely does. But hey keep it up, many of us are preparing to happily take over public safety from anarchists. Only we wont be as nearly as nice as police officers and we sure as hell will be better equipped.
 
There’s a difference between “not rushing to judgement” and “desperately hoping for any excuse to try and justify the killing, and when that fails doing so anyway”.....which is what conservatives do.

Funny how conservatives just about always think the use of lethal force is justified when the victims are minorities. The contrast between conservative defense of current police killings and the amount of time spent wailing over the cult of Koresh and “Aryan Nation“ Weaver is rather telling.

Conservatives would rather assume innocence until proven guilty, whereas, on the flip side, many (e.g. democrats, liberals, socialists and anarchists) quickly rush to judgement with absurd claims before evidence is revealed, lash out by destroying cities and then find out they were wrong (with subsequent destruction). It's telling when the judicial process adjudicates vastly different outcomes, and the cases like Michael Brown and Travon Martin demonstrate this.

You should put that broad brush away ...
 
He reached into his car. Thats why he was shot. Why are lefties such blatant liars?

Agree he reached into the vehicle, but we don't know what the law enforcement officer saw to trigger his reaction. Everything beyond that is "what if" scenarios or if you're on the left, social justice and he should be hanged (even if the officer was justified with using lethal force).
 
I see nothing wrong.Listen to the cops or suffer the consequences


How many cops were there and they could not control the situation without shooting the guy in the back.... Looked like a clown show.
 
Conservatives would rather assume innocence until proven guilty, whereas, on the flip side, many (e.g. democrats, liberals, socialists and anarchists) quickly rush to judgement with absurd claims before evidence is revealed, lash out by destroying cities and then find out they were wrong (with subsequent destruction). It's telling when the judicial process adjudicates vastly different outcomes, and the cases like Michael Brown and Travon Martin demonstrate this.

You should put that broad brush away ...

Unless that person is a minority, in which case they are “guilty” until proven innocent, and then still guilty long after that. Look at all the conservatives’ mewling about George Floyd’s “criminal record” to try and justify his murder for a case in point.


It is rather telling that the judicial system often covers for police officers who conduct extrajudicial killings. That is a large part of why people are protesting.
 
There you have it folks definitive proof that lefties want to incite you into disobeying the police. The left needs black men to fight the police and get shot in order to advance their political agendas. This^ is why Americans hate leftists. They are filthy little weaklings that use minorities deaths as food for their DNC insatiable grasp for power.

What an ignorant posting
 
What does being "conservative" have to do with anything.

We do know two things for sure in this case: No African American was murdered, and rioters did in fact light property on fire to protest a supposedly unjustified shooting before they had any of the relevant facts.

In 2019, 39 unarmed black or white victims were shot and killed by police. 25 of those were white.

We know one thing for sure: there is no limit to the extent conservatives will go to to try and defend extrajudicial killings of minorities by police officers.

White “protesters” routinely brandish firearms at police officers without consequence. Meanwhile, minorities are executed at the slightest excuse.
 
Please list the people who obeyed the police and still got killed. Lets do math and see just how you determined that they are routinely killed.

Just take a look at the news. Hardly a month goes by without an extrajudicial killing by a police officer.
 
We know one thing for sure: there is no limit to the extent conservatives will go to to try and defend extrajudicial killings of minorities by police officers.

White “protesters” routinely brandish firearms at police officers without consequence. Meanwhile, minorities are executed at the slightest excuse.

If only the statistics backed that up more than your own imagination.
 
If only the statistics backed that up more than your own imagination.

The percentage of conservatives trying to defend extrajudicial killings of minorities is rather high, as this forum shows quite well.
 
Unless that person is a minority, in which case they are “guilty” until proven innocent, and then still guilty long after that. Look at all the conservatives’ mewling about George Floyd’s “criminal record” to try and justify his murder for a case in point.

It is rather telling that the judicial system often covers for police officers who conduct extrajudicial killings. That is a large part of why people are protesting.

I do not know of anyone, Lib, Conservative or otherwise, who try to justify the action of Derek Chauvin.
 
Unless that person is a minority, in which case they are “guilty” until proven innocent, and then still guilty long after that. Look at all the conservatives’ mewling about George Floyd’s “criminal record” to try and justify his murder for a case in point.


It is rather telling that the judicial system often covers for police officers who conduct extrajudicial killings. That is a large part of why people are protesting.

Do you have examples where the judicial system is often covering for police officers?
 
You should try being an officer. I doubt you would make it but, everyday you walk out door you hope you will be walking back in later. The moment you let you guard down the next time your family might see you is in the hospital or worse. You have no idea what it is like to put you life on the line everyday, especially for those who do not appreciate it.

Cops have a less dangerous job than your local garbage man or truck driver. Cry me a ****ing river.
 
I do not know of anyone, Lib, Conservative or otherwise, who try to justify the action of Derek Chauvin.

Yeah .. I know. What Chauvin did was egregious and ended the life of a black American. Unfortunately, the district attorney overreacted with the severity of the indictment, and I would be very surprised if the felony murder charges stick.
 
It's also relevant from the point of view of third parties opining on this situation without a complete set of facts. The fact that the guy was arrested for sexual assault, and has priors that include pointing a firearm at police, make it more likely that he had violent intentions in this case that were evident to the cops in the ground, than if he was just any old average dude.

Sure. Let's find out if any of the cops involved had any internal investigations against them, too.
 
Unless that person is a minority, in which case they are “guilty” until proven innocent, and then still guilty long after that. Look at all the conservatives’ mewling about George Floyd’s “criminal record” to try and justify his murder for a case in point.


It is rather telling that the judicial system often covers for police officers who conduct extrajudicial killings. That is a large part of why people are protesting.

What conservatives were doing that? The Floyd case brought about a virtual unanimity of opinion that what the cop did was wrong. You, for some reason, feel the need to lie about that and engage in political smears as you have throughout this entire thread. Stop posting crap.
 
Back
Top Bottom