- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
- Messages
- 79,465
- Reaction score
- 83,987
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Or are they too mired in whiteness and just don't consider these "black jobs?"
Based on current US demographics, there seems to be at most a 14.4% chance.
Republican is a self-selection population. General population probabilities do not apply.
You're right, they consider melanin to be a disqualification.Unlike Democrats, Republicans don’t consider melanin to be a qualification. It’s just not something they’re actively looking for in a candidate. It’s inevitable that it will be an incidental for a future nominee.
Do you not realize that there probably is a segment of the population (Republican, not dopey MAGA), that would like to see some viable minority names tossed around as serious Presidential or VP candidate material?That’s why I said “at most”, since a much lower percentage of the US black population identifies as republicant.
Republicans have Trump as Presidential nominee at least through the 2028 election.Unlike Democrats, Republicans don’t consider melanin to be a qualification. It’s just not something they’re actively looking for in a candidate. It’s inevitable that it will be an incidental for a future nominee and it’s a reasonable assumption that they will be Hispanic.
No. Bigots won't change until another generation comes along that may tip that scale. But as far as the GOP goes, no POC, no minorities, no women, no gays. Just old, white, rich men.
Do you not realize that there probably is a segment of the population (Republican, not dopey MAGA), that would like to see some viable minority names tossed around as serious Presidential or VP candidate material?
There's a larger percentage of Latinos in America than blacks, why haven't Republicans seriously looked at a Latino as a candidate (Cancun Cruz is Canadian, so he doesn't count)?
Unlike Democrats, Republicans don’t consider melanin to be a qualification.
It’s just not something they’re actively looking for in a candidate. It’s inevitable that it will be an incidental for a future nominee and it’s a reasonable assumption that they will be Hispanic.
Unlike Democrats, Republicans don’t consider melanin to be a qualification. It’s just not something they’re actively looking for in a candidate. It’s inevitable that it will be an incidental for a future nominee and it’s a reasonable assumption that they will be Hispanic.
It’s more likely they consider political lean, just as the demorats do.They certainly seem to consider melanin when it comes to redistricting.
How'd those Hispanic men and the 2 Indians do?The Presidential candidates for the DNC in 2016 included 5 white men and 1 white woman. The RNC had 2 Hispanic men and 2 white men.
The Presidential candidates for the DNC in 2020 included 6 white men, 1 Asian man, 1 black man, 2 white women, and 1 Samoan woman. The RNC had 5 white men.
The Presidential candidates for the DNC in 2020 included 3 white men. The RNC had 3 white men, 1 Indian man, and 1 Indian woman.
Not surprised at all. Was at her AANHPI rally.I know Democrats may be totally surprised by this, but Kamala Harris isn’t Black, she’s Jamaican and Indian.
I know Democrats may be totally surprised by this, but Kamala Harris isn’t Black, she’s Jamaican and Indian.
The vast majority of Jamaicans are of Sub-Saharan African descent…
Or are they too mired in whiteness and just don't consider these "black jobs?"
How'd those Hispanic men and the 2 Indians do?