• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will Ferguson Cop sue for Pension?

IDNeon

Banned
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Messages
106
Reaction score
7
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Communist
Wilson is let go without pay...dodged a bullet one might say...he could have gone to prison for murder.

The real test of guilt is will Wilson sue for damages?

If Wilson is proveably innocent then he can easily be owed compensation from Ferguson police and others for damages to his income and pension.

If Wilson doesn't sue, it's well..to give an analogy. ...

FBI routinely holds suspects assets as hostages to get them to come to trial.

If they have nothing to hide...sue for them...prove the case against you is frivolous and get what's yours.

I'm pretty sure like most murderers and criminals Wilson will choose to forfeit his pension rather than sue for it and be exposed as a murderer.
 

If he is vested, they can't withhold it.
 
I thought Wilson resigned, very differnt than being "let go."
 
I thought Wilson resigned, very differnt than being "let go."

Plenty of "resignations" are against the employee's will. It is a way of allowing them to not be fired.

To the person above this quoted post. They can with hold anything if vested or otherwise, the burden is on Wilson to sue for it and then prove he deserves it by proving his innocence.

This is VERY COMMON in the world of criminal prosecution...you want what a legal non-law breaking person deserves? Sue for it.
 

What evidence do you have that Wilson was about to be fired?
 

He was never proven guilty of any criminal offense. At any rate, they can't withhold his pension if he is vested.
 
He was never proven guilty of any criminal offense. At any rate, they can't withhold his pension if he is vested.

If he isn't guilty and they withheld his pension then he would be able to sue and claim his vestment.

If however he is guilty, if he sued and was proven guilty he wouldn't get said vestment.
 
What evidence do you have that Wilson was about to be fired?

He is close to retirement but instead quits. He is not guilty but no one believes it.

Ferguson won't give Wilson his severance.
 
He is close to retirement but instead quits. He is not guilty but no one believes it.

Ferguson won't give Wilson his severance.

Again, where is your evidence of all this? Now you are making additional claims on top of not being able to prove a prerequisite for the current notion Wilson was about to be fired.
 
If he isn't guilty and they withheld his pension then he would be able to sue and claim his vestment.

If however he is guilty, if he sued and was proven guilty he wouldn't get said vestment.

Um, he's not going to court so how on earth can he be found 'guilty' of a crime?
 
He is close to retirement but instead quits. He is not guilty but no one believes it.

Ferguson won't give Wilson his severance.

Plenty of people of believe he isn't guilty including a grand jury.
 
He is close to retirement but instead quits. He is not guilty but no one believes it.

Ferguson won't give Wilson his severance.

THe more you write, the more I am doubting your ability to grasp reality- either that, or you're trolling. Wilson is 28 years old. He joined the force at the age of 22. He isn't retirement age, unless that particular police force has some highly unusual retirement policies.
 

Actually no, he couldn't have "gone to prison for murder", because no murder was committed.

Much to your chagrin, no further "test of guilt" is warranted.
 
He is close to retirement but instead quits. He is not guilty but no one believes it.

Ferguson won't give Wilson his severance.

Do you even have a slight clue what you are talking about? Obviously not. Wilson was not "close to retirement". Criminy, the guy is only 28 years old. What, did he join the force when he was three? :roll:
 

Wilson resigned, as in quit voluntarily. WTF is "provably innocent"? Everyone, in a criminal case, is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt (just ask OJ).
 

Wilson resigned, as in quit voluntarily and after only about 5 years on the force. WTF is "provably innocent"? Everyone, in a criminal case, is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt (just ask OJ).
 
Wilson resigned, as in quit voluntarily and after only about 5 years on the force. WTF is "provably innocent"? Everyone, in a criminal case, is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt (just ask OJ).

When I was saying provably innocent I was referring to the framework of denying someone a benefit for example and letting them sue you for it.

It is opposite of innocent until proven guilty. It is kinda a dick move actually lol.
 
Do you even have a slight clue what you are talking about? Obviously not. Wilson was not "close to retirement". Criminy, the guy is only 28 years old. What, did he join the force when he was three? :roll:

I had heard he was on the force 20 years so was going off that info provided on these forums from someone.that's all.
 
I had heard he was on the force 20 years so was going off that info provided on these forums from someone.that's all.

This entire thread is predicated on this idea. Don't you think you should know a little more before you go making wild accusations? This pretty much places anything you have to say into question.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…