HumblePi
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2018
- Messages
- 26,451
- Reaction score
- 19,037
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
She should do porn.
spoken like a true Trumper
She should do porn.
I can't imagine the line of thought that leads from her husband being charged with murder to porn.
spoken like a true Trumper
Yeah, the assets are probably worth $20,000 :mrgreen:
What a bizarre reaction.
What are you thinking?
He was working as extra security at bars and nightclubs
Heck he worked at one where Floyd worked at the same time. I would not doubt this cop was on the take and has money hidden
It wasn't my first thought either, but I've seen worse on DP. Perhaps 99% guy blames her too for some unknown reason, and he's expressing revenge fantasies? Idk. People who are caught up in this rage fest are doing all sorts of odd things, like destroying a football hall of fame museum this morning. Strange days we're living in.
If they find itThe irs will probably get all of that.
[h=1]Wife of ex-Minneapolis cop Derek Chauvin reportedly filing for divorce[/h]
The wife of Derek Chauvin, the fired Minneapolis police officer charged in the death of George Floyd, has reportedly filed for divorce over his role in the case, according to media reports.
Attorneys for Kellie Chauvin said Friday that she is seeking the “dissolution of her marriage” to Chauvin.
“She is devastated by Mr. Floyd’s death,” a statement on behalf of Kellie Chauvin and her family read. “Her utmost sympathy lies with his family, his loved ones and with everyone who is grieving.”
“She has filed for dissolution of her marriage,” the letter continued.
Kellie Chauvin doesn’t have any children from her current marriage, the letter said, and it was not clear how long the couple have been married.
Wife of ex-cop Derek Chauvin reportedly filing for divorce
-----------------------------------------------------------
She also asked for her children and family to have protection. He may have been abusive to her and their kids. I only have one thing I'd ask her; 'what took you so long?'
If they find it
No one seems to be on this mans side (public opinion wise). So why are we seeing arson and looting? Why is the media and the Democratic Party failing to condemn this criminal behavior?
It's really hard to spend wad of untaxed cash? what are you going to do? Buy gash and groceries for life?
Because the Democratic Party institutionally believes that all crime is acceptable when committed by people of color.
Good way for them to hide assets for the inevitable civil suits.
Yeah that whole “to death do us part” thing isn’t that popular anymore. I can’t say I’m shocked that a liberal is encouraging violation of marital vows though.
Do you actually believe this crap or are you just trolling?
This too.
The blue wall of silence formed by cops envelopes and protects fellow cops accused not merely of brutality on the job, but brutality off the job towards spouses, girlfriends and family members.
You have it backwards. Liberals never advocate staying in a marriage that's dangerous or where the couple is unhappy. Conservatives believe it's a woman's destiny to relinquish her identity, bend to the will of 'her man' and stick with him 'for better or worse' even though it may kill her in the end.
Where is it wrong?
The Democrats want to legalize drugs (which are very connected to violent and property crime) want to let violent criminals out of prison, repeal three strikes laws, they glorify people who were criminals and killed for it (the story around Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin was pure fiction and no liberals that I have seen ever admit they were wrong in those cases) they refuse to reform inner city schools, refuse to condemn single motherhood, etc
Their entire philosophy creates crime.
Drugs themselves don't cause violent and property crime, the prohibition does. Drug prohibition makes really nasty people very rich. No drug gangster would support legalization- he'd be back to shoplifting and stealing cell phones.
As for glorifying and refusing to condemn, that's just empty hyper-partisan dogma.
I think people are making assumptions about domestic violence.
I'm sure the family consulted attorneys, and this was probably an option presented to help protect her. This separates her from the issue - isolating her financially, and separating her in the public view. There's no question he's going to jail and facing lawsuits. She still has to live her life. Hopefully, he cares enough to not contest this.
There is no evidence that legalizing drugs would reduce problems.
. . When's the last time you heard of people hijacking whiskey trucks?
Ja sam Baba Yaga [emoji328]
Divorce should never be acceptable. It’s bad for society.
Both parties should stay, for better or for worse, or else the marriage isn’t marriage, merely a business partnership.
Not always, she was still married to him when the event occured she may not be protected financially....especially since filing for divorce is not a final order.