• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wife of ex-Minneapolis cop Derek Chauvin reportedly filing for divorce

I can't imagine the line of thought that leads from her husband being charged with murder to porn.

It wasn't my first thought either, but I've seen worse on DP. Perhaps 99% guy blames her too for some unknown reason, and he's expressing revenge fantasies? Idk. People who are caught up in this rage fest are doing all sorts of odd things, like destroying a football hall of fame museum this morning. Strange days we're living in.
 
Yeah, the assets are probably worth $20,000 :mrgreen:

He was working as extra security at bars and nightclubs

Heck he worked at one where Floyd worked at the same time. I would not doubt this cop was on the take and has money hidden
 
What a bizarre reaction.
What are you thinking?

She just lost her husband. Great way for her to make some cash. Beats writing fraudulent checks, which she is accused of doing.
 
He was working as extra security at bars and nightclubs

Heck he worked at one where Floyd worked at the same time. I would not doubt this cop was on the take and has money hidden

The irs will probably get all of that.
 
It wasn't my first thought either, but I've seen worse on DP. Perhaps 99% guy blames her too for some unknown reason, and he's expressing revenge fantasies? Idk. People who are caught up in this rage fest are doing all sorts of odd things, like destroying a football hall of fame museum this morning. Strange days we're living in.

Calm down now. Am I getting me tooed for an innocuous comment?
 
[h=1]Wife of ex-Minneapolis cop Derek Chauvin reportedly filing for divorce[/h]
The wife of Derek Chauvin, the fired Minneapolis police officer charged in the death of George Floyd, has reportedly filed for divorce over his role in the case, according to media reports.
Attorneys for Kellie Chauvin said Friday that she is seeking the “dissolution of her marriage” to Chauvin.
“She is devastated by Mr. Floyd’s death,” a statement on behalf of Kellie Chauvin and her family read. “Her utmost sympathy lies with his family, his loved ones and with everyone who is grieving.”
“She has filed for dissolution of her marriage,” the letter continued.
Kellie Chauvin doesn’t have any children from her current marriage, the letter said, and it was not clear how long the couple have been married.

Wife of ex-cop Derek Chauvin reportedly filing for divorce
-----------------------------------------------------------

She also asked for her children and family to have protection. He may have been abusive to her and their kids. I only have one thing I'd ask her; 'what took you so long?'

Yeah that whole “to death do us part” thing isn’t that popular anymore. I can’t say I’m shocked that a liberal is encouraging violation of marital vows though.
 
No one seems to be on this mans side (public opinion wise). So why are we seeing arson and looting? Why is the media and the Democratic Party failing to condemn this criminal behavior?

Because the Democratic Party institutionally believes that all crime is acceptable when committed by people of color.
 
It's really hard to spend wad of untaxed cash? what are you going to do? Buy gash and groceries for life?

I am not saying he has millions of dollar's. A hundred thousand can be hidden and spent fairly easily
 
Because the Democratic Party institutionally believes that all crime is acceptable when committed by people of color.

Do you actually believe this crap or are you just trolling?
 
Good way for them to hide assets for the inevitable civil suits.

That's sick. You idolize the guy so much that you fantasize his marriage is fine and they're working together. You can't bear to imagine the guy's life in chaos. You go against all logic and reason to paint a fantasy world for him and yourself.
 
Yeah that whole “to death do us part” thing isn’t that popular anymore. I can’t say I’m shocked that a liberal is encouraging violation of marital vows though.

You have it backwards. Liberals never advocate staying in a marriage that's dangerous or where the couple is unhappy. Conservatives believe it's a woman's destiny to relinquish her identity, bend to the will of 'her man' and stick with him 'for better or worse' even though it may kill her in the end.
 
Do you actually believe this crap or are you just trolling?

Where is it wrong?

The Democrats want to legalize drugs (which are very connected to violent and property crime) want to let violent criminals out of prison, repeal three strikes laws, they glorify people who were criminals and killed for it (the story around Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin was pure fiction and no liberals that I have seen ever admit they were wrong in those cases) they refuse to reform inner city schools, refuse to condemn single motherhood, etc

Their entire philosophy creates crime.
 
This too.

The blue wall of silence formed by cops envelopes and protects fellow cops accused not merely of brutality on the job, but brutality off the job towards spouses, girlfriends and family members.

One of my friends found that out firest hand, and her husband was just the son of a local judge. It's not fellow cop in that case, but it was connection with the justice system in that town.
 
You have it backwards. Liberals never advocate staying in a marriage that's dangerous or where the couple is unhappy. Conservatives believe it's a woman's destiny to relinquish her identity, bend to the will of 'her man' and stick with him 'for better or worse' even though it may kill her in the end.


Divorce should never be acceptable. It’s bad for society.

Both parties should stay, for better or for worse, or else the marriage isn’t marriage, merely a business partnership.
 
Where is it wrong?

The Democrats want to legalize drugs (which are very connected to violent and property crime) want to let violent criminals out of prison, repeal three strikes laws, they glorify people who were criminals and killed for it (the story around Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin was pure fiction and no liberals that I have seen ever admit they were wrong in those cases) they refuse to reform inner city schools, refuse to condemn single motherhood, etc

Their entire philosophy creates crime.

Drugs themselves don't cause violent and property crime, the prohibition does. Drug prohibition makes really nasty people very rich. No drug gangster would support legalization- he'd be back to shoplifting and stealing cell phones.
As for glorifying and refusing to condemn, that's just empty hyper-partisan dogma.
 
Drugs themselves don't cause violent and property crime, the prohibition does. Drug prohibition makes really nasty people very rich. No drug gangster would support legalization- he'd be back to shoplifting and stealing cell phones.
As for glorifying and refusing to condemn, that's just empty hyper-partisan dogma.

There is no evidence that legalizing drugs would reduce problems. First off for most drugs there’s no legitimate business that could sell them. You libs made it illegal to sell raw milk because of Listeria, you think food and drug regulators are going to approve the sale of Meth? Are we going to indemnify all producers of illegal drugs?

So all the drugs will still be made by organized crime.

But furthermore it is immoral to permit people to use drugs in the first place
 
I think people are making assumptions about domestic violence.

I'm sure the family consulted attorneys, and this was probably an option presented to help protect her. This separates her from the issue - isolating her financially, and separating her in the public view. There's no question he's going to jail and facing lawsuits. She still has to live her life. Hopefully, he cares enough to not contest this.

Not always, she was still married to him when the event occured she may not be protected financially....especially since filing for divorce is not a final order.
 
There is no evidence that legalizing drugs would reduce problems.

. . When's the last time you heard of people hijacking whiskey trucks?

Ja sam Baba Yaga [emoji328]
 
. . When's the last time you heard of people hijacking whiskey trucks?

Ja sam Baba Yaga [emoji328]

in fact prohibition led to a lot of gangsterism.
 
Divorce should never be acceptable. It’s bad for society.

Both parties should stay, for better or for worse, or else the marriage isn’t marriage, merely a business partnership.

bad for society to allow a woman to divorce a man that beats her?
 
Not always, she was still married to him when the event occured she may not be protected financially....especially since filing for divorce is not a final order.

No, the order is not final. But an uncontested divorce with no kids can be resolved fairly quickly. Once the order is final, the assets are split, and I doubt a civil court would go after her assets for his actions. It's not perfect, but it's a sound move to try to separate her before the avalanche falls on him.
 
Back
Top Bottom