• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why wasn't abortion and "women's reproductive rights" more important to voters?

Cosmo said:
So you're saying the only those people have a right to life, the exhaustive list of such people, is below, right?
Click to expand...
Cosmo said:
So you're pretending the below in red does not exist?

Does that also mean anyone merely born (regardless of in the United States or not) is a citizen of the United States?
Click to expand...

Questions questions questions...not a cogent thought in sight.

Lursa said:
Why dont you tell us, cite it from federal law, federal court decisions, the Const, etc. who the federal govt recognizes rights for? Quote it specifically, since you wont accept anything from us.

Like my Aunt Etta always said, "either shit or get off the pot." Stop all the avoidance and obstructions and tell us. I've asked you enough...why wont you? Can you?
Click to expand...
 
Cosmo said:
The fact that you don't understand that the US Constitution is federal is all anyone needs to know about you.
Click to expand...

Where did I write that? Quote it or stop yer lyin'.

I've given you options...and you cant cite a single one. 😁

Lursa said:
Why dont you tell us, cite it from federal law, federal court decisions, the Const, etc. who the federal govt recognizes rights for? Quote it specifically, since you wont accept anything from us.

Like my Aunt Etta always said, "either shit or get off the pot." Stop all the avoidance and obstructions and tell us. I've asked you enough...why wont you? Can you?
Click to expand...
 
Cosmo said:
The US Constitution is a "stretch?"
Click to expand...
You are apparently not understanding my argument... or you are trying to twist it. *shrug*
 
Cosmo said:
To a citation from the US Constitution you reply with a request for a citation from federal law.
Click to expand...

Or the Const. 🤷 It's not surprising you dont know what "etc." means. ;) We're all asking you to cite where the federal govt recognizes rights for the unborn. Where are your citations?

This doesnt go away...you can retreat, having failed...or keep up your obvious "avoidance" or:

Lursa said:
Why dont you tell us, cite it from federal law, federal court decisions, the Const, etc. who the federal govt recognizes rights for? Quote it specifically, since you wont accept anything from us.

Like my Aunt Etta always said, "either shit or get off the pot." Stop all the avoidance and obstructions and tell us. I've asked you enough...why wont you? Can you?
Click to expand...
😁
 
Cosmo said:
All people that like to redact the US Constitution. You are among them.
Click to expand...

Quote where I've done so. Explanations are not reposting the exact text and claiming that's proof :rolleyes: ...that's your roadshow...and it's silly and a failure.
Explanations attempt to clarify...simplify for you at this point...and so build on the actual text.

Of course, dont forget where you had to "redact" the US Code 8 when you attempted to "explain" it ;)
 
Cosmo said:
Because our laws are written in English, and if you can write in English this:

then lawmakers can write in English that same exact sentence.
Click to expand...

Please cite where federal lawmakers have written that ⬇️ "same exact sentence?"

Bodi said:
The Right to life is a Right to all born people...
Click to expand...
 
Cosmo said:
Because our laws are written in English, and if you can write in English this:

then lawmakers can write in English that same exact sentence.
Click to expand...
No, they don't. Anyway, it has nothing to do with language... sorry.
 
Bodi said:
No, they don't. Anyway, it has nothing to do with language... sorry.
Click to expand...
So lawmakers cannot physically write "The Right to life is a Right to all born people..." ?
 
Cosmo said:
So lawmakers cannot physically write "The Right to life is a Right to all born people..." ?
Click to expand...
LOL. What does that have to do with a person's Right?
 
Bodi said:
LOL. What does that have to do with a person's Right?
Click to expand...
What would a law enumerating rights have to do with a person's rights? That's your question?
Lursa said:
Please cite where federal lawmakers have written that ⬇️ "same exact sentence?"
Click to expand...
Why do you ask this question? Did I say they wrote that same exact sentence?
 
Cosmo said:
What would a law enumerating rights have to do with a person's rights? That's your question?
Click to expand...
I didn't ask a question. I made a statement.
 
Cosmo said:
Why do you ask this question? Did I say they wrote that same exact sentence?
Click to expand...

Lursa said:
Questions questions questions ⬆️ ...not a cogent thought in sight.
Click to expand...

Lursa said:
Why dont you tell us, cite it from federal law, federal court decisions, the Const, etc. who the federal govt recognizes rights for? Quote it specifically, since you wont accept anything from us.

Like my Aunt Etta always said, "either shit or get off the pot." Stop all the avoidance and obstructions and tell us. I've asked you enough...why wont you? Can you?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom