• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why wasn't abortion and "women's reproductive rights" more important to voters?

Lursa said:
Either it's murder or it's not. They want to have it both ways...whichever slut shames women most it seems.

If it's a pregnancy from rape or incest...it's ok to kill it...because it's not her fault.​
​
If it's because her birth control failed or will 'just' destroy her kidneys or its defective but "might" survive...she chose to have sex so you cant kill it...it's "her consequences"...using the child as punishment. (So "Christian!" It dehumanizes both.)​

A few anti-choicers dont make those exceptions...so at least they're consistent, if even more cruel.
Click to expand...
The point is, using the claims that forced pregnancy violates the 13th Amendment and that it violates anti-rape law, it would be possible to challenge Dobbs, and there are several other ways to challenge its constitutionality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom