• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Trump Must Be Impeached Now, We Cannot Wait For The 2020 Election To Remove Him From Office

None of that is illegal, nor does it have anything to do with what the Russians did to interfere with our elections.

If Trump doesn't want negative stories about him, he shouldn't do so much stupid and unprofessional stuff, especially in public. Maybe stop lying, especially to try to protect his own ego, even at the expense of others.

But the issue is influence that swayed voters.

You think the Russians little social media game influence more voters than the biased non-stop one sided liberal media coverage, or the collusion with the DNC?
 
Count that one paid.

Close enough. They are providing the troops that patrol the border.

No they aren't. Because we still have the same amount of personnel patrolling our side. And troops on their border have nothing to do with whether or not the wall is built nor on the effectiveness on either when it comes to stopping illegal immigration.
 
If you'll show that Trump lied on anything..

You don't want me to chase conspiracy theories while you and the dems chase conspiracy theories about Trump?:lamo

Is that a serious question? Do any Google search and you'll see that Trump has lied at least 10,000 times while in office.

The Trump impeachment is based on facts. Your paranoid Deep State musings exist only in your mind, the minds of disturbed Repugs, and in Fox News fantasies. That's the difference.
 
But the issue is influence that swayed voters.

You think the Russians little social media game influence more voters than the biased non-stop one sided liberal media coverage?

Yes, it did sway voters. It is still working to pass on false narratives to divide the country.

Your claim of non-stop liberal media coverage is highly biased and shows that you seem to believe that regular media is viewed the same as say something on facebook or the Internet. Unfortunately, it isn't. Regular media is held accountable by its viewers for unverified sources, forced on multiple occasions to correct stories or apologize for wrong information. Facebook and other internet, right-alt media is not.
 
Virtually every reasonable person in the country disagrees with you.

The Mueller Report disagrees with you.

The CIA disagrees with you.

The FBI disagrees with you.

The entire 17 agencies Federal Government intel community disagrees with you.

Wikipedia disagrees with you.

The history books that your children and grandchildren read in school will disagree with you.

I see a common theme here.

Hence, this is why you are a Trump acolyte Deep State believer. And you ridicule Democrats. Priceless.

The supervisors and team leaders need to provide better instructions to their operators.
 
Count that one paid.


Close enough. They are providing the troops that patrol the border.

Are you saying the Mexican troops at the border with the US are close enough to being a wall (against illegal immigration)? 'Cause the troops do act like a wall (against illegal immigration).
 
Are you saying the Mexican troops at the border with the US are close enough to being a wall (against illegal immigration)? 'Cause the troops do act like a wall (against illegal immigration).
For purposes of the campaign promise, that's it exactly. Count it a promise kept.
 
Show that there was quid pro quo or Trump election interference when Trump made the phone call to Zelensky.

Chief of Staff Mike Mulvaney already admitted to the quid pro quo in a recent news conference...in front of news reporters. My goodness.
 
Yes, it did sway voters. It is still working to pass on false narratives to divide the country.

Your claim of non-stop liberal media coverage is highly biased and shows that you seem to believe that regular media is viewed the same as say something on facebook or the Internet. Unfortunately, it isn't. Regular media is held accountable by its viewers for unverified sources, forced on multiple occasions to correct stories or apologize for wrong information. Facebook and other internet, right-alt media is not.

It's not biased. It's proven. Of course the worst of the MSM partners make excuses for it.

Trump'''s Right: His Media Coverage Is Mostly Negative

Access to this page has been denied.

Networks Trashed Trump With 90% Negative Spin in 2018, But Did It Matter?


The false narratives seeking to divide this country are coming from the NDP, and their MSM partners.
 
Chief of Staff Mike Mulvaney already admitted to the quid pro quo in a recent news conference...in front of news reporters. My goodness.
Since they seem committed to taking this poor evidence to trial, we will see how it goes.
 
Is that a serious question? Do any Google search and you'll see that Trump has lied at least 10,000 times while in office.

The Trump impeachment is based on facts. Your paranoid Deep State musings exist only in your mind, the minds of disturbed Repugs, and in Fox News fantasies. That's the difference.

First of all, that 'Trump lied, at least, 10,000 times in office' comes from a link from the discredited source PolitiFact. And two, the lie that the Trump impeachment is based on facts. Quid pro quo is not based on facts nor is digging dirt on Biden based on facts.
 
Last edited:
Just one more we hate Trump article that gets posted everyday at DP. The left is
still in the hate Trump rage from election when he beat Clinton even while we were told
over and over that would not happen. Trump will not be removed from office and with the
wackos running for president on the democratic side he will easily win reelection.

Yes we hate him and for good reason. With Richard Nixon, he committed a crime and was impeached but quit before a vote in the Senate. But Richard Nixon's crime was tape recording people and lying about it. That's basically it. Trump's crimes strike directly at the very core of the U.S. Constitution by removing the separation of powers and those given to the the Congress which is 1/3rd branch of government. Our democracy cannot survive as a constitutional republic when one of the three branches of government has their power removed and overlooked.

Richard Nixon's crimes never even came close to disassembling, destroying and replacing the powers of Congress with his own. Trump is doing that today and has been doing that since the first few months of his presidency.
 
You don't keep up with the news, do you? There are, at least, 20,000 Mexican soldiers stationed at the border with Mexico to stop illegal immigration, so, Mexico IS paying for part of the wall.

BO's father wasn't American. BO's mother had former American citizenship but there wasn't proof BO's mother was an American citizen at the time of BO's birth. BO lived for a time in Africa. There was no birth certificate produced of BO until after BO was elected president.

Uh Oh....I see typical Repug racism starting to creep into this debate. Hardly surprising.
 
Chief of Staff Mike Mulvaney already admitted to the quid pro quo in a recent news conference...in front of news reporters. My goodness.

Then Mulvaney walked it back and said he was misinterpreted. Oh my goodness.
 
It's not biased. It's proven. Of course the worst of the MSM partners make excuses for it.

Trump'''s Right: His Media Coverage Is Mostly Negative

Access to this page has been denied.

Networks Trashed Trump With 90% Negative Spin in 2018, But Did It Matter?


The false narratives seeking to divide this country are coming from the NDP, and their MSM partners.

First, everything you have posted has been after the election. Election interference was during 2016, not 2018.

The country is already divided. It is being divided more by those like Trump who are insisting that Democrats are the enemies, calling people names who don't agree with him, etc. That is dividing the country far more than "negative reporting" about Trump. His own tweets prove any negative reporting that is put up against him. He is actually doing those negative things.
 
It involves exchanging something for something else. Guess what? Most illegals aren't actually getting in just by walking across the border in a way that can be stopped by troops guarding it, especially not since it is unreasonable to believe that Mexico will keep those troops at the border for any significant amount of time. There is no indication that it is actually permanent.

Additionally, to barter, you would have to show that the thing you are giving someone is useful, the same value as what you are getting. It would be dumb to claim that it is a good barter or even a barter at all because someone starts taking better control of their dog (or country) only after you start building a fence (wall) around your property, and that this is a barter or valuable to you at the same cost of putting up that fence.

Did cabse5 really ask for a definition of bartering? LOL.
 
First of all, that 'Trump lied, at least, 10,000 times in office' comes from a link from the discredited source PolitiFact. And two, the lie that the Trump impeachment is based on facts. Quid pro quo is not based on facts nor is digging dirt on Biden based on facts.
Since they seem committed to taking this poor evidence to trial, we will see how it goes.
 
First of all, that 'Trump lied, at least, 10,000 times in office comes from a link from the discredited source PolitiFact. And two, the lie that the Trump impeachment is based on facts. Quid pro quo is not based on facts nor is digging dirt on Biden based on facts.

Keep in mind that the paid propagandists, and the people they are trying to influence, can't grasp the fact that the principle of quid pro quo, which Mulvaney was attempting to explain, has been engaged in by every President since this country was founded.

Perhaps it's because the closest thing they have come to negotiation is trying to get more allowance from Mommy.

The idea of, "if I give you this, what do I get in return" is the functional aspect of all negotiation. There is nothing illegal about that. It's foundational to the practice.

It's interesting the liberal boiler rooms, the New Democratic Party leadership, and their MSM partners, apparently know their followers are too stupid to know that, and are banking on them remaining that way.
 
First of all, that 'Trump lied, at least, 10,000 times in office' comes from a link from the discredited source PolitiFact. And two, the lie that the Trump impeachment is based on facts. Quid pro quo is not based on facts nor is digging dirt on Biden based on facts.

Show that it has been "discredited" at all. You make this claim and don't back it up. They have each quote that is shown to be a lie.

There are no facts in the investigation into Bidens, just a conspiracy theory being pushed by Trump's own personal lawyer. And Trump has shown for a long time that he loves conspiracy theories. Quid pro quo does not have to be stated to be investigated or even to have someone convicted of it. There is an obvious quid pro quo (unethical and illegal) in what Trump did with relation to the Ukraine, to anyone not blinded by personal bias for Trump or political agendas.
 
Since they seem committed to taking this poor evidence to trial, we will see how it goes.

"Poor evidence" when the guilty party admits to wrong doing? Got it, dude. Brilliant perspective.
 
Keep in mind that the paid propagandists, and the people they are trying to influence, can't grasp the fact that the principle of quid pro quo, which Mulvaney was attempting to explain, has been engaged in by every President since this country was founded.

Perhaps it's because the closest thing they have come to negotiation is trying to get more allowance from Mommy.

The idea of, "if I give you this, what do I get in return" is the functional aspect of all negotiation. There is nothing illegal about that. It's foundational to the practice.

It's interesting the liberal boiler rooms, the New Democratic Party leadership, and their MSM partners, apparently know their followers are too stupid to know that, and are banking on them remaining that way.

Prove that any other President kept approved aid funding or even a meeting with them as a condition of agreeing to do a public investigation into their political rival and the opposite political Party.
 
Did cabse5 really ask for a definition of bartering? LOL.

roguenuke doesn't know the definition of bartering since roguenuke said it wasn't bartering that Mexico has placed over 20,000 troops at the border to inhibit illegal immigration.
 
First, everything you have posted has been after the election. Election interference was during 2016, not 2018.

The country is already divided. It is being divided more by those like Trump who are insisting that Democrats are the enemies, calling people names who don't agree with him, etc. That is dividing the country far more than "negative reporting" about Trump. His own tweets prove any negative reporting that is put up against him. He is actually doing those negative things.

That's not true

The Left's MSM partners began their attacks the moment President Trump announced his intent to run for the office. The lies, distortions, and out of context quotes began on day one, and have never stopped.

You don't want to try to deny that.
 
First, everything you have posted has been after the election. Election interference was during 2016, not 2018.

The country is already divided. It is being divided more by those like Trump who are insisting that Democrats are the enemies, calling people names who don't agree with him, etc. That is dividing the country far more than "negative reporting" about Trump. His own tweets prove any negative reporting that is put up against him. He is actually doing those negative things.
About 35% or so of the country, including almost all the traditional media outlets, think of Trump as the devil. You seem to be in this camp. Trump is doing a very good job unifying the other 65%. Don't take my word on this. We'll vote exactly one year from today, just to prove it to you.
 
Back
Top Bottom