No that' not how it works ,I asked you to tell me that the courts can't define the constitution and that they can't regulate guns and that they never have regulated guns. Because if you can't say that your simply agreeing with my thread , that the courts have and can regulate gun bubbas guns. You can't bull**** your way through this, , with your gun bubbas gibberish, that you think is law. it's not going to happen
Oh good grief, he has practices this rhetoric for years, anyone on the other side of his position and if they had spent their whole life putting together a shpeel about any subject and you would get the same degree of accuracy from the opponent of all debates, this case being the guns for everyone routine. Do you really think that the insanity of , it's not the gun it's the guy who shoots the gun garbage is going to do anything arguing with someone who has more then 1/2 of a brain.
that' not how it works ,I asked you to tell me that the courts can't define the constitution and that they can't regulate guns and that they never have regulated guns. Because if you can't say that your simply agreeing with my thread , that the courts have and can regulate gun bubbas guns. You can't bull**** your way through this, , with your gun bubbas gibberish, that you think is law. it's not going to happen"Not quite , you can either answer my question or you can not , and since I asked first where does that put you, Hero./
Are you serious my claim is that the court can define the constitution , that it can regulate guns and that it has regulated guns/. So are you saying one of those points isn't correct. To repeat myself the biggest threat to the second by far are the my way or the highway gun bubbas. This being a example.
Not quite , you can either answer my question or you can not , and since I asked first where does that put you, Hero./
I wonder how lame you have to be, The federal courts can interpret the constitution , they can regulate guns and have regulated guns and will in the future regulate gun, In all situations I support totally the fed watchdogging over the states because in hate party run states ,they would bring back segregation because they are bigots, they would require everyone to own a gun and have state law saying you can shoot someone for looking at you in your self described threatening way. They would stop educating the young, because bright people don't vote for the hate party. They would take your SS away, your medicare away and buy guns with it. They would cut taxes for the wealthy to zero. They would take away all government safety nets and then outlaw the poor and handicapped from living on the streets, They would have laws to stop all Democrats from voting in their state, They would write a law that say white only for everything, including living in the state, they would write law supporting Chauvinism, bigotry, Islamophobia,hatred of anyone who isn't white, They would capture the poor in their states by making them so poor that they couldn't leave. They would write laws forcing you to be a Evangelical. There are also hundreds of other things that the right would write law about all bad , all ugly, all cruel.
Not quite , you can either answer my question or you can not , and since I asked first where does that put you, Hero./
