• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Defund PBS?

This is why this is frustrating.
Because you want the truth to be something and it's not.

I get that's frustrating.
Nothing you wrote contradicts what I wrote.
So what the hell are you frustrated over? Are you having a hard day?
You wrote things that ar basically in agreement with me but with an air of “Nuh uh” to it.
So why are you frustrated? Is it because you're attempt to gaslight me is failing?
 
Because you want the truth to be something and it's not.

I get that's frustrating.

So what the hell are you frustrated over? Are you having a hard day?

So why are you frustrated? Is it because you're attempt to gaslight me is failing?
You are right.

I should go back to the plan of ridicule.
 
You are right.
Not because I'm some sort of magical big thinker. It's because I do my best to set aside tribalism.
I should go back to the plan of ridicule.
Whatever you have to do to make yourself feel better about it. Do your worst.
 
PBS is an important source of science programming and long form investigative journalism, both sorely lacking in MSM.

PBS is ALSO the source of constant left wing nagging about the burning LGBTQIAPOC issues of transgender rights, Black century old grievances, and the plight of Palestinian terrorist supporters, among other things that are of interest to about 10% of the public. For the rest of us, it's like being force fed Brussels sprouts.

If PBS were fixated on MAGA's favorite issues, it would have probably more people interested, but I doubt that liberals would think it deserved public funding.
You don't watch PBS, do you?
 
When you are contradicting the consensus of literally every virologist on the planet, yes you do need expertise in virology.
I'm not. The majority of virologists (every single anything doesn't agree on everything.) understand you can still carry the virus even if you're vaccinated it's not that the vaccine has made your body a fortress and penetrable by the virus it means that your white blood cells have the ability to fight it off with minimal or no symptoms at all.

This is something that was understood in the 19th century again you don't need a PhD for this all you have to do is read about the smallpox vaccine.
 
You don't need a PhD this is 101 level stuff. Do you not think you would pass a beginner course because you don't have a PhD?
I know… I know…. 101 is all about completely ignoring population statistics and only focuses in on individuals.

Epidemiology famously is concerned with ignoring the public side of public health.
 
That you can still carry the virus even though you have the antibodies to fight it off?

That vaccines are incapable of affecting the spread of diseases to uninfected people.
 
I know… I know…. 101 is all about completely ignoring population statistics and only focuses in on individuals.
If you thought you were right you would try and steel man my position versus make strawman fallacies. This is why it's so frustrating. I'm not going to defend against your attack on the strawman you fabricated.
Epidemiology famously is concerned with ignoring the public side of public health.
See above.
 
You don't need a PhD this is 101 level stuff. Do you not think you would pass a beginner course because you don't have a PhD?

It isn’t 101 stuff. You are literally saying vaccines don’t stop the spread of viruses. That is a contradiction of the entire fields of virology and epidemiology.

So where did you get your PhDs?
 
I'm not. The majority of virologists (every single anything doesn't agree on everything.) understand you can still carry the virus even if you're vaccinated it's not that the vaccine has made your body a fortress and penetrable by the virus it means that your white blood cells have the ability to fight it off with minimal or no symptoms at all.

This is something that was understood in the 19th century again you don't need a PhD for this all you have to do is read about the smallpox vaccine.

Source for your claim that the majority of virologists agree with you that vaccines don’t stop the spread of viruses?
 
Ahh, an antivaxxer.
So it's anti-vax to understand that even after your vaccinated you can still carry the virus and infect other people with it?

So it's not anti-vax to say it's a magical spell that protects you and the virus can't infect you because of the magic
Nevermind.
I never did.
 
So it's not anti-vax to say it's a magical spell that protects you and the virus can't infect you because of the magic
No one says that.

No one has said that.

There is that black and white thinking again.
 
Fishing in downtown Reno. Surely dangerous evil propaganda. Think of the children.



:mad:

Fly fishing is Marxist.

I doubt a fishing show would carry PBS I'm pretty sure the highest rated program is sesame Street. It doesn't have 4600 episodes because people aren't that into it.

Masterpiece is the highest rated show and I will say I like that one occasionally. But antiques road show and some obscure fishing channel you watch no those are just hanging on slot fillers.
 
No one says that.
Then maybe you should quit trying to make straw man arguments about my position and address what I said.
No one has said that.

There is that black and white thinking again.
Seems like whether you're infected or not by a virus is pretty black and white how can you be somewhat infected by a virus is the virus halfway in?
 
It isn’t 101 stuff.
It's pretty basic. All it takes is cursory curiosity. I bet I could find an article that explains vaccines help you gain antibodies to fight off of various not that it stops you from ever getting infected.
You are literally saying vaccines don’t stop the spread of viruses.
Because they don't that's not what they're for. Again they provide your body with antibodies to fight off infection.

How do you not know this? Why would you need to fight off infection with antibodies if you could no longer get infected?
That is a contradiction of the entire fields of virology and epidemiology.
No it's not it's a contradiction of your belief.
So where did you get your PhDs?
You don't need a PhD you just need to know what an antibody is.
 
I doubt a fishing show would carry PBS
Okie doke.

Outdoor Nevada is a PBS show. Watch it first, then you'll know.

Fly fishing is Marxist. Evil propagandist URBAN fishing. Downtown. URBAN. You know what that means.

I'm pretty sure the highest rated program is sesame Street. It doesn't have 4600 episodes because people aren't that into it.

Masterpiece is the highest rated show and I will say I like that one occasionally. But antiques road show and some obscure fishing channel you watch no those are just hanging on slot fillers.
Here's another one.



Rodeo cattle drive. Pure PBS propaganda. It begins in a nice rural area, but the destination is URBAN.

Mutton bustin' is Marxist.
 
Then maybe you should quit trying to make straw man arguments about my position and address what I said.

Seems like whether you're infected or not by a virus is pretty black and white how can you be somewhat infected by a virus is the virus halfway in?
Because as I painstakingly wrote out before…. It is about probabilities.

If you are vaccinated you are less likely to become infected if you are exposed… I didn’t say you won’t… but you are less likely

If you are infected and vaccinated one tends to be less ill… here is where I don’t claim that you won’t get sick if you are infected but compared to those who are not vaccinated the illness is less severe.

Also… the vaccinated are more likely to clear the virus from their body faster than those who are not vaccinated and here is a pretty important part when it comes to epidemiology… THEY SPEND LESS TIME BEING A VECTOR.

None of this is magic.

None of this is black and white.

Seriously… this attitude that if something doesn’t work 100% it is useless is bullshit that killed a lot of people who didn’t need to die.

It is killing people now who don’t need to die.

It is making long Covid a real problem in this country.

None of that has to happen… it is a choice that we as a nation have made to feel that we are all
Special snowflakes who don’t have to worry about spreading diseases because we don’t want the inconvenience of getting a tiny needle in the arm.

What a bunch of pampered idiots we have become.
 
Okie doke.

Outdoor Nevada is a PBS show. Watch it first, then you'll know.

Fly fishing is Marxist. Evil propagandist URBAN fishing. Downtown. URBAN. You know what that means.


Here's another one.



Rodeo cattle drive. Pure PBS propaganda. It begins in a nice rural area, but the destination is URBAN.

Mutton bustin' is Marxist.

I started to watch this one because it is a piece of wild history.


It’s about a football game that the US army had in Nagasaki just months after a nuke leveled the place.

Just wild.

Oh… and Marxist.
 
Back
Top Bottom