- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
- Messages
- 2,383
- Reaction score
- 717
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
There should be a massive Lysistrata-style sex strike in Texas about now, but we won't get it. What's wrong with about half of women?
What's "wrong" with them is, I suspect, they have a different definition than you on what constitutes human life.There should be a massive Lysistrata-style sex strike in Texas about now, but we won't get it. What's wrong with about half of women?
Brainwashing is common, especially in the Churchy states.There should be a massive Lysistrata-style sex strike in Texas about now, but we won't get it. What's wrong with about half of women?
Lol...as if Right Wingers give a **** about human life. See COVID in red states for proof of that.What's "wrong" with them is, I suspect, they have a different definition than you on what constitutes human life.
An odd way to describe Roe v Wade, but okay.The idea that you can legislate when life begins is the very definition of hubris.
I actually think that is the root of the discussion.What's "wrong" with them is, I suspect, they have a different definition than you on what constitutes human life.
Literally posted on that thought in another thread just seconds ago ...I actually think that is the root of the discussion.
If you think life begins at conception, chances are you are pro life.
If you think life does not begin at conception, chances are you are not pro life.
Pro birth, not pro life.I actually think that is the root of the discussion.
If you think life begins at conception, chances are you are pro life.
If you think life does not begin at conception, chances are you are not pro life.
Especially when they are anti-mask and anti-vax.What's "wrong" with them is, I suspect, they have a different definition than you on what constitutes human life.
There should be a massive Lysistrata-style sex strike in Texas about now, but we won't get it. What's wrong with about half of women?
I actually think that is the root of the discussion.
If you think life begins at conception, chances are you are pro life.
If you think life does not begin at conception, chances are you are not pro life.
As a "minor" the fetus is still under the authority of the parent.
And that’s fine, as long as they don’t try to force others to abide by their values when they disagree on the morality of abortion.What's "wrong" with them is, I suspect, they have a different definition than you on what constitutes human life.
Most likely if the fetus cannot survive without that parent's "life support".And, therefore, can be legally killed if the parent so chooses?
Most likely if the fetus cannot survive without that parent's "life support".
Maybe because they have seen and bonded with a child well before birth. Total speculation on my part. I remember seeing my kids before they were born, technology must be much better now. Couldn't imagine chosing to kill them.There should be a massive Lysistrata-style sex strike in Texas about now, but we won't get it. What's wrong with about half of women?
Yes, given certain conditions. A parent can terminate "life support".Therefore, a human can be legally killed by his/her parent ... right?
As can a spouse;Yes, given certain conditions. A parent can terminate "life support".
Like child support is to certain fathers?I guess bodily autonomy is a foreign concept to certain women…