One of the most extraordinary features of Barack Obama's victory over John McCain was his capture of 78% of the Jewish vote. To be sure, there was nothing extraordinary about the number itself. Since 1928, the average Jewish vote for the Democrat in presidential elections has been an amazing 75%—far higher than that of any other ethno-religious group.
Yet there were reasons to think that it would be different in 2008. The main one was Israel. Despite some slippage in concern for Israel among American Jews, most of them were still telling pollsters that their votes would be strongly influenced by the positions of the two candidates on the Jewish state. This being the case, Mr. McCain's long history of sympathy with Israel should have given him a distinct advantage over Mr. Obama, whose own history consisted of associating with outright enemies of the Jewish state like the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and the historian Rashid Khalidi.
Firstly, the premise that Jews are necessarily a politically homogenous ethnic/religious group that lack sufficient nuance to adopt any position other than unwavering support for the Israeli government should raise more than one eyebrow. Secondly, there isn't and will not soon be any major U.S. presidential candidate seriously opposed to the aims of the political regimes of Israel anyway, so pro-Israeli government individuals can effectively vote for any major political candidate without concern for any break of previous U.S. governmental policy toward Israeli affairs. Beyond that, Jews are generally liberal and would thus be more inclined to favor liberal Democratic candidates.
in virtually every instance of a clash between Jewish law and contemporary liberalism, it is the liberal creed that prevails for most American Jews. Which is to say that for them, liberalism has become more than a political outlook. It has for all practical purposes superseded Judaism and become a religion in its own right.
What a load of bull****. As bad as McCain was, if you had a conservative bone in your body you would have done whatever it took to keep Obama away from the White House. What you're saying doesn't even make sense.Exactly, I'm a conservative and I voted for Obama, not because I particularly liked him but because I didn't want McCain and Palin anywhere remotely close to the White House.
Lots and lots of conservatives did the same.
Beyond that, Jews are generally liberal and would thus be more inclined to favor liberal Democratic candidates.
Exactly, I'm a conservative and I voted for Obama, not because I particularly liked him but because I didn't want McCain and Palin anywhere remotely close to the White House.
Lots and lots of conservatives did the same.
Higher level of educational attainment correlates to liberal-leaning political views, also in my opinion.
In my experience (which is admittedly limited; there are not overmany Jews in Texas), Jews tend to be more educated than non-Jews, on average.
Higher level of educational attainment correlates to liberal-leaning political views, also in my opinion.
Higher level of educational attainment correlates to liberal-leaning political views, also in my opinion.
Yeah, that's kind of BS in my opinion.
Post-graduates tend to lean liberal, but college graduates in general lean conservative.
In my experience (which is admittedly limited; there are not overmany Jews in Texas), Jews tend to be more educated than non-Jews, on average.
Higher level of educational attainment correlates to liberal-leaning political views, also in my opinion.
Might have something to do with conservatives always bringing up anti-semitic stuff like this!!! :2wave:
that's just dumb. seriously, what basis do you have tht more education makes you more liberal?
What a load of bull****. As bad as McCain was, if you had a conservative bone in your body you would have done whatever it took to keep Obama away from the White House. What you're saying doesn't even make sense.
One has only to look at the fact that states with the lowest median incomes and the lowest levels of educational attainment are consistently red states (deep South); consistently blue states have some of the highest median income levels, and the highest levels of educational attainment (East and West Coast).
The redder the state, the poorer and less educated its residents.
The bluer the state, the better educated and more affluent its residents are likely to be.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?