They support free-market Capitalism, yet LOVE farm-subsidies and paying farmers to NOT grow corn.
Some conservatives agree with this, not all. Nice stereotyping and bigoted stereotyping of everyone in a particular group based on what some do.
They support taxing people less, but they want a flat-tax that will lower taxes on those who can afford to pay the most in taxes, and raise taxes on those who can least affod to pay more in taxes.
Conservatives support low taxes. They also generally support the notion that you don't punish people for wealth. Most also acknowledge a certain level of taxation is required. Ideally I'm sure most conservatives would like to abolish taxes all together. Such is not practical or likely possible. In regards to your "hypocritical" statement, in reality you have two different views of conservatives coming up against each other and thus having to find a middle group.
They support taking power away from the govt. and giving it to the people, and yet they want to take the right to vote away from the poor and those who pay no Federal income taxes.
Again, bigotry on your part and dishonest attempts to spin your OPINIONS of how you view a situation as absolute fact. Dishonest spin from a hyper partisan. Not all conservatives are in favor of such a measure, showing your hyperbolic and low attack through taking the actions of a few and applying it to everyone in a group. Additionally, should such happen it does not necessarily take it away from the poeple and shift it to the government, it could just as easily and legitimtaly be argued that it simply shifts it from one group of people to another group of people.
They support states' rights, but they want a Constitutional Amendment banning gay marriage...which would trump states' rights.
A ridiculous and laughable comment given the light of the final comment in this post, since passing a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT is the legitimate, correct, and constitutional method of implimenting a national edict that interfere's with what would normally be something that is states rights. "States Rights" deals with the notion that the federal government shouldn't be unconstitutionally interfering with issues that should be decided by the states. Passing a constitutional amendment, essentially amending the document that is a pact between the various states, does not infringe upon State's Rights but actually supports it by properly following the correct path in regards to issues of Federal and State Jurisdiction.
They claim to be Libertarian, but they support the govt. having authority over a woman's body.
More hyper partisan twisting and spin, hyperbolic bigotry, and ignorant statements by the OP. All conservatives do not claim to be libertarians. Again Thunder demonstrates he's the political equivilent of those who accuse all muslims as being terrorists. Additionally he once again, ignorantly and egotistically, decides to present his particular OPINION as indisputable and concrete fact which is laughable to an extreme that you could syndicate it as a sitcom. The "pro-life" issue from a conservative view point, and indeed to make an argument about the hypocrisy of the ideology one would actually have to address the ideology honestly which is why Thunder's post fails because he's seemingly unwilling to deal with anything honestly that doesn't serve his hyper partisan ends, is not about a woman's body but rather about the States role in protecting children which is not something that goes against conservative ideology. It would not be hypocritical to suggest a conservative interfere with parental rights by taking a child from a home when a mother tries to slit the childs throat; neither is it hypocritical then to suggest it is ideologically hypocritical that conservatives wish to have the government intervene with regards to abortions as conservative ideology views the chlid in the womb as just that...a child.
They claim to be strict-Constitutionalists, but they often have no idea what the Constitution actually says.
Pure opinion and nothing more, and on top of that the opinion of a hyper partisan who has shown a significant lack of grasp for understanding the role of the constitution and what conservative ideology actually is and who has consistently in this thread alone highlighted their extreme and obvious prejudice and bigotry towards conservatives and gross stereotyping of an entire group of people. Thunder has one nothing in this thread to truly highlight a wide spread and "inherent" hypocracy of conservatism, but rather simply served to show his own true self regarding his twisted feelings towards conservatives and his true colors as the type of person who would slander and attack an entire group based on what a portion of the group does putting him on equal level, similiar mental view points, and the same ethical and moral standings as those who would decry all muslims as blood thirsty murdering terrorists that hate America.
.......why such hypocrisy with Conservatives? Is it inherent in their ideology?
No more that your dishonesty and bigotry towards those that think differently than you shows that such things are inherent to liberal ideology.