- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Messages
- 22,341
- Reaction score
- 9,893
- Location
- Alaska (61.5°N, -149°W)
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
By your reasoning, the government must prove in a court of law, on an individual basis, why someone needs to have a driver's license before banning driving without a license. That just isn't how due process works.
Incorrect again. States have already established substantive due process with regard to driver's licenses by requiring individual tests before issuing them individually. Therefore with regard to driver's licenses States are adhering to the Due Process clause. What no government may do is restrict the individual right to freely travel without due process first.