• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who's to blame for the Arizona massacre?

Screw it. I will take the blame for this guy. Maybe that will stop the 45+ retarded threads going on in this forum right now.
 
Pot_Meet_Kettle.jpg


Indeed.

feel free to prove so. I have proven that some of the anti gun claims are BS


for example, claims that guns are only made to kill which you already debunked

and don't start on your law school nonsense
 
I am having too much fun trouncing you on that other thread :)

You kidding? I'm playing you like a violin. You are the mastah of delusion mega. A true mastah.
 
Yes, you feel the need to respond to me twice, yet you say you are winning. :)
 
Yes, you feel the need to respond to me twice, yet you say you are winning. :)

I never said I was winning. I said I was playing you like a violin.

Let's try a different approach. We'll use pictures instead of words so maybe this will work better for you:


Me cat - you mouse.

images
 
I never said I was winning. I said I was playing you like a violin.

Let's try a different approach. We'll use pictures instead of words so maybe this will work better for you:


Me cat - you mouse.

images

I can't wait to see your end game, I should be plenty surprised :lol:
 
I can't wait to see your end game, I should be plenty surprised :lol:

<whispers> I can't give it all away, but it involves the Zoo and the monkey cage....
 
Moderator's Warning:
Ockham, Mega.... cut that out. :doh:
 
posted it on this board before--its common knowledge for those of us up on this topic

btw you have made lots of claims I know are BS

Saying "common knowledge" is not a verifiable source. I have sourced all my claims, except one, which I admit was a bad stat. What about you?
 
Saying "common knowledge" is not a verifiable source. I have sourced all my claims, except one, which I admit was a bad stat. What about you?

do you know how to google
 
GunCite: Gun Control - Gun Homicides


Studies conducted at both the local and national level indicate the overwhelming majority of murders are committed by people with previous criminal records. Even a significant percentage of homicide victims themselves have criminal records.
 
GunCite: Gun Control - Gun Homicides


Studies conducted at both the local and national level indicate the overwhelming majority of murders are committed by people with previous criminal records. Even a significant percentage of homicide victims themselves have criminal records.

Exactly, thank you. As an ex-cop I can affirm that many homicides are basically BG-on-BG.
 
Exactly, thank you. As an ex-cop I can affirm that many homicides are basically BG-on-BG.

I remember dealing with a drug case where one of the mopes was being charged by the county for whacking a dealer who was stealing from him clear aggravating factors but no DP specification. So I asked the County ADA and she cited the 'cockroach' rule.


one cockroach squashing another didn't get DP specs
 
I am trying to relate these so-called facts to the thread topic.

well the point is most of those who kill others illegally with guns are already completely banned from even touching a gun so expecting that more bans would stop those who commit murder is rather stupid
 
I am trying to relate these so-called facts to the thread topic.

The digression is a direct result of some people trying to make this attack into a gun control issue, or lay it at the feet of Republicans, Tea-Partiers, or conservative pundits.

Not namin' any names, you understand...
 
So answer this question: Knowing what you know about this shooter, should he have been able to buy a gun a little over a month ago?
 
So answer this question: Knowing what you know about this shooter, should he have been able to buy a gun a little over a month ago?
You're asking people to employ the hindsight bias in their reasoning. It's like saying, "if you were to use this fallacy in your reasoning, THEN what would your conclusion be?"
 
Back
Top Bottom