• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Who's the most effective politico radio host?

Who's the most effective politico radio host?

  • Laura Inghram

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Neil Boortz

    Votes: 1 6.3%
  • Michael Gallagher

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Michael Savage

    Votes: 3 18.8%
  • Howie Carr

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sean Hannity

    Votes: 1 6.3%
  • Rush Limbaugh

    Votes: 6 37.5%
  • Michael Reagan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Randi Rhodes, from the failed Air America show

    Votes: 1 6.3%
  • Other, please name them

    Votes: 4 25.0%

  • Total voters
    16
***Ann Coulter wins every politico debate she gets into.

You mean just like you :rofl

Ann Coulter is also a babe of extreme proportions

Bony curveless and with an Adams Apple. But if lanky guys are your thing...

she has authored 5 best selling books--that makes it 5 more books than Ms Rhodes has had.

Oh I get it, its quantity over quality. I always thought we should judge an author by the content of their work. For example, what does this tell you about Ann Coulter:

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war. "
 
You mean just like you :rofl

***Exactly, when liberals attempt to debate me and realize they offer a losing side to the debate--then the thread degenerates to name calling; thus the reason most the threads end up in the basement. The reason liberals lose in debate is because I have 'fact' on my side as the best political weapon possible.



Bony curveless and with an Adams Apple. But if lanky guys are your thing...

***I've always preferred my women to be on the slender side, as opposed to being obese.



Oh I get it, its quantity over quality. I always thought we should judge an author by the content of their work. For example, what does this tell you about Ann Coulter:

***Its not just Ann's quanity of books over the zero books by Ms Rhodes--its also the quality.

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war. "

***I would have to see the context in which this quote was derived from. By the looks of it, it seems that Ann was making a point of what to expect in going to war; perhaps in comparison to taking the liberal diplomacy route that always ends in failure. War is war, why not kill them first by using all of the best military options available to us? I don't recall the Taliban being overly concerned about killing 3000 innocent civilians on 9/11...do you?
 
Is this even a real poll?? Only somebody who lived on Mars would not know that Rush is the most influential talk radio host in the world.

He is the pioneer and reigning king of talk radio. His show has been number one for years without even a close contender.

You may not like him but like it or lump it he's the king.

I see him as only being influentual with a particular swath of people. He will influence a 'ditto head' all day, but that's preaching to the choir.
 
***Ann Coulter wins every politico debate she gets into. Ann Coulter is also a babe of extreme proportions, and she has authored 5 best selling books--that makes it 5 more books than Ms Rhodes has had.
Exactly.

Liberals arrogantly think they are intellegent and that those who disagree with them are stupid. But arrogance is born from insecurity. it's a cover up for their on doubt in their positions. They always attack the person rather than the issues because they are unable to hold their on in a debate simply about the issues. So about the time you've pounded them into a corner they start with the arrogant bull hockey, "Well, you're just not intellegent. You are ignorant and retarded... blah, blah, blah"

Just remember:

Just because you claim the intellectual high ground doesn't mean you actually occupy it.
 
Bony curveless and with an Adams Apple. But if lanky guys are your thing...


I have had my suspicions too. But one I'm more sure of is Laura Ingraham.

I saw her for the first time on some pundit-attracting show recently. I said 'Hmm, so that's her. She's kinda hot.' Then, it was like 'she's very gangly and has broad shoulders.' Then I heard the deep voice, and saw the huge Adam's apple, and thought 'appears her dad wanted a daughter...'
 
Exactly.

Liberals arrogantly think they are intellegent and that those who disagree with them are stupid. But arrogance is born from insecurity. it's a cover up for their on doubt in their positions. They always attack the person rather than the issues because they are unable to hold their on in a debate simply about the issues. So about the time you've pounded them into a corner they start with the arrogant bull hockey, "Well, you're just not intellegent. You are ignorant and retarded... blah, blah, blah"

Just remember:

Just because you claim the intellectual high ground doesn't mean you actually occupy it.

What an arrogant post!
 
I have had my suspicions too. But one I'm more sure of is Laura Ingraham.

I saw her for the first time on some pundit-attracting show recently. I said 'Hmm, so that's her. She's kinda hot.' Then, it was like 'she's very gangly and has broad shoulders.' Then I heard the deep voice, and saw the huge Adam's apple, and thought 'appears her dad wanted a daughter...'
I suppose hillary and janet reno are more up your alley.
 
Exactly.

Liberals arrogantly think they are intellegent and that those who disagree with them are stupid. But arrogance is born from insecurity. it's a cover up for their on doubt in their positions. They always attack the person rather than the issues because they are unable to hold their on in a debate simply about the issues. So about the time you've pounded them into a corner they start with the arrogant bull hockey, "Well, you're just not intellegent. You are ignorant and retarded... blah, blah, blah"

Just remember:

Just because you claim the intellectual high ground doesn't mean you actually occupy it.

Seriously, though, another party claims the moral high ground, and they certainly don't occupy that. I guess everybody has to claim some dubious pedestal area to at least appear to be important or pretend to stand for something.
 
***Ann Coulter wins every politico debate she gets into. Ann Coulter is also a babe of extreme proportions, and she has authored 5 best selling books--that makes it 5 more books than Ms Rhodes has had.

Obviously you believe good debate tactics consist of batting your eyes and flipping your hair?

It's a shame this forum doesn't allow us to see you mimic Coulter's mannerisms.

Do a search of the debate between Peter Bienhart and Ann coulter.

He blew her out of the water...why? Because Ann has zero facts to back up what she spews.
 
Back
Top Bottom