- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 66,470
- Reaction score
- 47,494
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Can you provide any links to the bills being anything but bipartisan, or is that something you repeat with no real knowledge of? Just curious
it was found to be partisan pap, as opposed to bi-partisan legislation, as it has been wrongly characterized by the GOP propaganda machine
partisan republican bills that would not be favorably considered by the democrat dominated senate
while i can't stand harry reid, he's a corrupt, partisan sack of ****, it appears his reasoning for not moving that partisan legislation to a vote makes good sense
Yes, though I doubt you are using the term in its proper context as most of the legislation passed by the House was not that at all.
I'm sure all good partisan troopers are instructed and assigned that particular talking point. It's a darn good way to give irresponsible government license to do nothing but what is self serving for itself. But it's a free country and so far everybody is allowed their opinion (unless their opinion is politically incorrect.)
You really think you can vote for Hillary Clinton and still be "for liberty?"
In other words, you are fine with whatever the politicians want to spend on defense so long as it is more than it is today. Your argument is vague, so vague that you can include or exclude any threat to be accounted for.
Why don't you give us a list of so-called partisan bills? Again, Sen. Harry Reid and several Democrats in the Senate do not care if the Bill is bipartisan or not. The way Obamacare was passed clearly shows that.
There are few that meet YOUR bi-partisan standard. Understand there is no universally accepted standard for "bipartisan" and thus part of the issue with continual reliance on that word.
I understand your standard, I don't think it's a horrible standard, but please stop acting like your standard is anything other than your opinion on the matter and that others comments should be based on your opinion.
My "bi-partisan" standard is a pretty low bar.... 30 dem votes out of 200 democrats... that is a 15% threshold.
Back to my point, that even in double team, you seem to be unable to overcome, the reason bills are not being taken up by the Senate is because they aren't serious bills
Whats it to you? Are you a troll or do you intend on voting in a republican primary.
Anyone the libs say "guarantees a win for dems". Is probably a good candidate
Lots of good candidates in 2016
Jeb Bush
Rand Paul
Mitt Romney
Paul Ryan
Ted Cruz
Ben Carson
Scott Brown
At this point i am leaning Paul or Carson
I like the idea of a president that has done something other than politics. I also share many of the same positions of paul and carson. Not all, but i dont miss the forest for the trees. I would support any of the above candidates tho if they won the primary.
What say you
I like Jon Huntsman a lot and actually made a contribution to his campaign back in 2012, but he is not nearly crazy enough to make it through today's Republican Primary process. Ben Carson would be a good one to nominate if the Republicans want to lose over 40 states. The same with Cruz. I like Chris Christie a lot but he needs to lose a lot more weight if he wants to run.
Indiana governor Mike Pence or
Ohio governor Kasich sp
Needs to be a governor
To me senators don't have enough experience running things.:twocents:
This post is hilarious, but I don't think you intended it to be. You really think Christie can't get elected if he is overweight? Why is that? I don't think he can get elected because of all the scandals in New Jersey and his behavior during Mitt's run for the white house.
Being overweight would not keep you from being elected, but being morbidly obese would. The presidency is a hard job. It ages even healthy people a lot. Look Bush the guy is a health nut, eats well, exercises strenuously, and it still aged him a lot. How many guys do you know of that are Christies size that live to even 60?
That's a good point, though Christie always claims he is healthy and has normal cholesterol and blood pressure. Who knows if it is true. It's actually hard to believe.
He has lost quite a bit of weight in the past year.
He has lost quite a bit of weight in the past year.
Lots of good candidates in 2016
Jeb Bush
Rand Paul
Mitt Romney
Paul Ryan
Ted Cruz
Ben Carson
Scott Brown
At this point i am leaning Paul or Carson
I like the idea of a president that has done something other than politics. I also share many of the same positions of paul and carson. Not all, but i dont miss the forest for the trees. I would support any of the above candidates tho if they won the primary.
What say you
he's shed considerable credibility, too
,,,must be all the running from the press....
Being overweight would not keep you from being elected, but being morbidly obese would. The presidency is a hard job. It ages even healthy people a lot. Look Bush the guy is a health nut, eats well, exercises strenuously, and it still aged him a lot. How many guys do you know of that are Christies size that live to even 60?
:lol: Implying that the hispanic vote is driven entirely by ethnicity. Cruz would lose the demographic handily.Put this whole Hispanic vote thing to rest.
CRUZ
:lol: Implying that the hispanic vote is driven entirely by ethnicity. Cruz would lose the demographic handily.
He has run from nothing and he remains a formidable candidate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?