Is it clear to you that the FBI colluded with the DNC to attempt 1- alter election results and then 2- overthrow them? Is it clear to you that the FBI and other agencies spied on political enemies, turning over unmasked data on political opponents to administration officials and DNC operatives? Is it clear to you that the FBI knowingly used fabricated and corrupted evidence bought and paid for by a political party to attempt to gain FISA warrants and use as a springboard for investigations? Is it clear to you from the evidence that came from the text messages of FBI officials themselves that they engaged in a conspiracy to overthrow a president?
Trump did not need a fake dossier to make himself look bad. He did that all on his own, perhaps that is why Hilldog got 3 million more votes, hmmm. There are still some Americans who value integrity as a leadership quality, the GOP certainly does not.
1-Who are you, where are you from, and why the **** should I care abooot your opinion if you arent FROM our country? 2-You typed a lot of **** while avoiding answering the question. I reckon thats because you know you have to either acknowledge the truth which makes you look like ****, or lie, which also makes you look like ****.Must suck living in such a corrupt cesspool of a country. Most Americans must shake their heads and thank God their country isn't like yours.
Those who value integrity, irrespective of political lean, surely don't think of Hillary Clinton as an exemplar.
And anyone that has a problem with that but that has spent the last few years cheering on the previous administrations actions will be will be OK with that...right? Because they sure did endorse the previous administration weaponizing the DOJ and using them for political gain. So if they **** themselves now if it DOES happen, why then they will just paint themselves as hypocrites...and not just corrupt assholes. Right?
Those who value integrity, irrespective of political lean, surely don't think of Hillary Clinton as an exemplar.
Why would that need rationalization? It was a no brainer.Those who value integrity observe that Republicans are scouring the deepest recesses of the internet for any conspiracy theory they can find in order to rationalize their support for Trump over Clinton. The worse Trump is shown to be, the more imaginative the fantasy over what Clinton has done.
Where did I say Im happy with ANY of this? What i said was "anyone that has a problem with that but that has spent the last few years cheering on the previous administrations actions will be will be OK with that...right? Because they sure did endorse the previous administration weaponizing the DOJ and using them for political gain. So if they **** themselves now if it DOES happen, why then they will just paint themselves as hypocrites...and not just corrupt assholes. Right?"So you're happy with the United States descending into a full-blown dictatorship because you're butt hurt over Trump being investigated.
I wonder when it was exactly that Republicans woke up and said, "You know what? Screw this democracy thing."
What has happened to going after criminals without the President having to point them out? Must still be some swamp critters.It is apparent that Barr is going after the FBI and Hillary Clinton on orders from Trump. My question is who is next on the agenda for Barr on orders from trump? Will Barr investigate anyone running against Trump in the 2020 election, like many of the Dem candidates? I mean if Barr is so willing to go after anyone trump wants to hurt, why not other candidates? This is what is wrong when a supposedly independent position in our government becomes a weapon of someone who is willing to use his position as president to not only have an enemies list, but to go after those on the list. And we all know that the GOP leaders are too frightened of trump and his supporters to do anything to stop Trump. That has been made crystal clear.
Where did I say Im happy with ANY of this? What i said was "anyone that has a problem with that but that has spent the last few years cheering on the previous administrations actions will be will be OK with that...right? Because they sure did endorse the previous administration weaponizing the DOJ and using them for political gain. So if they **** themselves now if it DOES happen, why then they will just paint themselves as hypocrites...and not just corrupt assholes. Right?"
And you would agree with that...right?
Those who value integrity observe that Republicans are scouring the deepest recesses of the internet for any conspiracy theory they can find in order to rationalize their support for Trump over Clinton. The worse Trump is shown to be, the more imaginative the fantasy over what Clinton has done. You yourself are just one heartbeat away from posting articles from infowars, assuming you haven't done so already.
Your personal attacks are really boring, mainly because you offer only a paucity of real argument to supplant them.
Frankly, I don't think those who voted for Trump feel the need to justify their votes anymore than those who voted for Hillary Clinton do.
But I do think it's more than a little funny that you characterize continuing citizen interest in Clinton as a desperate search for a conspiracy theory. Looks to me as if there really might have been a conspiracy to destroy the candidacy of Trump and then to wrest the Office from a duly elected President. We all will see.
And yet they clearly do feel the need to justify their vote for Trump by scouring the internet for conspiracy theories about Clinton, as you do. Why bother with that effort if there's no need to rationalize their decision?
As I do? I'd advise "Try harder" if you'd tried at all. FYI, there is no need to scour the Internet; all anybody needs to do is read headlines.
:lamoThe false equivalency you just created is too stupid for words.
It just amazes me how insane the anti-Trump movement has gotten.
BTW, there is a rooster fight in Thailand tomorrow at 7:54 EST....what odds can you get on the white one?
1-Who are you, where are you from, and why the **** should I care abooot your opinion if you arent FROM our country? 2-You typed a lot of **** while avoiding answering the question. I reckon thats because you know you have to either acknowledge the truth which makes you look like ****, or lie, which also makes you look like ****.
Either way....
Not really, the IG report didn't find there was "DEEP STATE!" out there conspiring against Trump, or did you forget that?You know what's funny ?
It wasn't Trump or the Republicans that called for the IG investigation into the FBI that uncovered Stzroks and Pages text, led to Peter Sztroks firing, and led to Andrew McCabe being fired and criminally investigated
It was the Democrats. Yup ! Elijah Cummings and John Conyers wanted IG Horrowitz to investigate the FBI for the way they handled the Hillary email investigation. This was back when the Democrats hated James Comey for costing Hillary the election.
I bet Elijah Cummings wishes he could have that one back.
As I do? I'd advise "Try harder" if you'd tried at all. FYI, there is no need to scour the Internet; all anybody needs to do is read headlines.
hillary clinton - Google Search
I have not given up hope that a Barry Goldwater will emerge, save the party from its self. But to be honest, may be too late. I am an eternal optimist.
It is apparent that Barr is going after the FBI and Hillary Clinton on orders from Trump. My question is who is next on the agenda for Barr on orders from trump? Will Barr investigate anyone running against Trump in the 2020 election, like many of the Dem candidates? I mean if Barr is so willing to go after anyone trump wants to hurt, why not other candidates? This is what is wrong when a supposedly independent position in our government becomes a weapon of someone who is willing to use his position as president to not only have an enemies list, but to go after those on the list. And we all know that the GOP leaders are too frightened of trump and his supporters to do anything to stop Trump. That has been made crystal clear.
The GOP has gone way too far to the right. They are not the party I used to support.
And yet you regularly use garbage CT sources to make your arguments. So yes, you do very much scour the dirtiest places on the internet, and all to make yourself feel better about your support for trump. Sad.
worst thing i'm seeing on here is that she stole a bit from Bill Maher lol. what about all that uranium she "sold to Russia"? what about that pedophile ring? what about her emails or Benghazi? seems most people have moved on...just not American conservatives.