Whites Are the Only Group That You Can Discriminate Against Legally in America

[Monserrat]

The fallacy in this thought process lies in the belief that only wealthy whites benefit from privilege. The point is, we live in a society where the rules of the game are largely written by whites, for whites, and are enforced by whites. And it's not just the wealthy that reap the benefits.

Do I necessarily believe that affirmative actions are OK when evaluated in a vacuum? Not, not necessarily. But considering all the disadvantages that minorities have whites have no place bitching about affirmative action until they've walked in someone else's shoes. In reality, in SPITE of Affirmative Action programs, whites still enjoy immense advantages in American society simply by being the dominant majority, and there's research that backs this up. But in our society it's impolitic to point out these advantages because a lot of whites tend to be offended at the thought that they enjoy any sort of built in advantages. It's easier to whine about reverse racism and affirmative action and ignore your own privileges because the grass is always greener i suppose.

So you do think it's okay to discriminate against white people because some of them are wealthy? (based on the above bolded section in your post)

 

[P. Kersey]

They have a quota system...google stop and frisk

There is no "quota system" that requires (or even ALLOWS) a cop to harass innocent people.

I don't I have stated multiple times now that i do not support AA. I DON'T support AA. Two wrongs don't make a right but you are conveniently unaware of the wrong that happens to give white people an upperhand in life.

I'm unaware? Explain it to me, then.

Let me ask you? Are you in favor of abolishing AA?

Please explain, either way why it should or should not continue.

 

[Fruityfact]

So you do think it's okay to discriminate against white people because some of them are wealthy? (based on the above bolded section in your post)

He clearly wasn't saying that.
The advantage a few minorities are afforded via AA is much lesser than the advantage that white people have-this takes place not only in prevalence but also the amount of advantage afforded

 

[Fruityfact]

There is no "quota system" that requires (or even ALLOWS) a cop to harass innocent people.

NYPD officers say they had stop-and-frisk quotas - CNN.com

I'm unaware? Explain it to me, then.
Let me ask you? Are you in favor of abolishing AA?
Please explain, either way why it should or should not continue.

No need to play naive...then again i suppose maybe you truly are unaware
I'm in favor of the best/most qualified person getting the position. Whether that be in government, colleges(where whites are often favored over asians. Blacks over whites), etc

 

[Monserrat]

He clearly wasn't saying that.
The advantage a few minorities are afforded via AA is much lesser than the advantage that white people have-this takes place not only in prevalence but also the amount of advantage afforded

I'd prefer to respond to his response since the question was posed to him instead of assuming what he may or may not have meant.

What advantage to you think white people have over others based on the color of their skin?

 

[P. Kersey]

NYPD officers say they had stop-and-frisk quotas - CNN.com

Right...well cops are supposed to investigate crime...and that is a way to make sure they aren't sitting in the donut shop instead of working. Nowhere does it say "You must stop and harass innocent (black) people."

For example; I've seen these little metal boxes on and in buildings, parking lots, etc... where there is a key on a chain attached. I never knew what they were for until someone told me that was where the night watchman had to insert that key to log in on some kind of device that he carries to prove he was making his rounds and not sleeping in a corner somewhere.

My point is that...much as I despise cops, at SOME point you have to believe that not ALL of them are corrupt ALL the time.
Again, Like I said...if there have been crimes committed and the criminal was a 30 year old black man..who SHOULD the cops be investigating? 80 year old chinese women?

No need to play naive...then again i suppose maybe you truly are unaware
I'm in favor of the best/most qualified person getting the position. Whether that be in government, colleges(where whites are often favored over asians. Blacks over whites), etc

So you ARE in favor of abolishing affirmative action?

 

[Kal'Stang]

Pat Buchanan: "Whites Are the Only Group That You Can Discriminate Against Legally in America Now"

Syndicated columnist Pat Buchanan made a statement Friday guaranteed to make liberal media members' heads spin.

During a discussion about Affirmative Action on PBS's McLaughlin Group, Buchanan said, "Whites are the only group that you can discriminate against legally in America now"

(video follows with full transcript, commentary and comments.): -> Pat Buchanan: 'Whites Are the Only Group That You Can Discriminate Against Legally in America Now' | NewsBusters

What say you, is Pat Buchanan right ?

I concur with Buchanan.

Technically he is half correct as AA laws only mention minority groups, women, persons with disabilities, and covered veterans. So basically any healthy white male that is not a veteran can be legally discriminated against.

 

[P. Kersey]

Technically he is half correct as AA laws only mention minority groups, women, persons with disabilities, and covered veterans. So basically any healthy white male that is not a veteran can be legally discriminated against.

WHAT!!!???

THAT'S HERESY YOU RACIST REDNECK BIGOT! /sarcasm

 

[Paschendale]

That first sentence is your assumption. Going on the assumption that it is accurate then you still have a problem here, this topic of discussion is about race and you're talking about economic class. Why do we talk about privilege in terms of race when it has nothing to do with it and it's still based on your assumptions on individuals and how you think they act and behave based on their economic status. It's an extremely limited view that gets us back to the same question I posed...why is it okay to discriminate against white people because some of them are wealthy?

Okay, your assumption is that white people are being discriminated against. What you're confusing for discrimination is actually just having to play fair with everyone else. And if you don't understand the links between race and class, then you're practicing some serious willful ignorance here. Most racism is actually just class issues.

Technically he is half correct as AA laws only mention minority groups, women, persons with disabilities, and covered veterans. So basically any healthy white male that is not a veteran can be legally discriminated against.

By "discriminated against" you really mean "not afforded extra help to make up for artificial roadblocks placed in their path". But as above, it's hardly surprising when people who are accustomed to privilege all their lives and must make do without it confuse it from actual discrimination.

 

[Fiddytree]

Silly notion, but so was this thought of his.

First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.

Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.

A Brief for Whitey - Patrick J. Buchanan - Official Website

Those paleos don't know when to hush up and stop themselves from alienating people of color.

 

[Fiddytree]

So you do think it's okay to discriminate against white people because some of them are wealthy? (based on the above bolded section in your post)

Do you think it's okay to discriminate against the rich?

 

[Monserrat]

Okay, your assumption is that white people are being discriminated against. What you're confusing for discrimination is actually just having to play fair with everyone else. And if you don't understand the links between race and class, then you're practicing some serious willful ignorance here. Most racism is actually just class issues.

That's a whole bunch of assumptions you are making about me.

All I've ever said is that I don't agree with discriminating against anyone based on race, which most people would agree with only I would add white people to that as well which I get the sense that a lot of you wouldn't extend it to white people which boggles my mind because honestly if someone is poor and struggling to make it by then I really don't care what there skin pigmentation happens to be they're people and they all should be helped if we can help them.

If racism is just class issues then it's not racism by definition.

 

[Fiddytree]

Most racism is actually just class issues.

That's a bit more Marxian than many racial minority analysts would possibly feel comfortable with.

 

[APACHERAT]

:To sports; athletic ability is to a large degree a product of genetics. Its a matter of history that during the slavery era, black slaves were intentionally bred similar to livestock in order to produce future generations of slaves with the greatest physical abilities in order to maximize their capabilities in the rigors of slave duties. Today their descendants are a product of that gene pool. Using very empirical evaluations, due to nobody's fault or biases today, it just so happens some of the descendants of slaves give them an advantage in sports as a result of the breeding practices of the slave labor industry over a century ago. In comparing athletic prowess to regular jobs, the thinking among some, who gets hired and more commonly who get promoted after being hired, is less about undeniable special aptitude and more about perceptions or if there are honest qualifications differences they may be due to unfairness that factored in when people were becoming qualified.

That's right out of the Progressives "Dillingham Commission" report to Congress.

But the American black slaves were not very productive agricultural workers. But for the large plantation owners slavery was still profitable since he didn't have to pay the slaves for their labor except for room and board.

It's comparable to todays construction industry. It takes five illegal aliens to be as productive as three American construction tradesmen. But as long as the contractor pays the illegal alien a fraction of what a skilled American is paid, it's very profitable for him. But the quality of the work is questionable.

 

[Moot]

You don't understand how percentages work, do you?

Negroes make up 13% of the population...now look at your table...Hugely disproportionate amounts of crime but a tiny section of society. Thanks for proving my point.
Negroes commit over half of ALL violent crime in america.

Didn't you see the percentages I posted? Apparently, you didn't understand what you looking at.

69.4% of all crime is commited by whites and only 28.4% is commited by blacks. That is a far cry from the "half" that you are claiming. Whites commit far more violent crimes than blacks including violent rape (9,504 to 4,811) and sex crime against children (38,422 to 13,189) and drug abuse violations (783,564 to 371,248). Yet blacks are 39.4% of the prison population compared to whites (29.3%). How is that possible? Are blacks getting fair sentencings compared to whites? No, they are not. In fact, blacks are getting much harsher sentences for non violent crime such as possession of marijuana than whites are. (Read the link below.)

So what happens when a young black man is sent to prison for such minor offenses as marijuana? Well, for one thing, it ruins his entire life because now he has a felony record and he can't get a job or go to college. So if you want to blame someone...blame whites for passing harsh sentencing laws that disproportionally incarcerates far more blacks than whites and forces them into a life of crime.



5.(State Prisons, Drug Offenders by Race) The most serious offense for 237,000 sentenced prisoners in state facilities at the end of 2010 was a conviction involving illegal drugs. Of this total: 69,500 (29.3%) were non-Hispanic white, 105,600 (44.6%) were non-Hispanic black and 47,800 (20.2%) were Hispanic.....
Race and Prison | Drug War Facts


29.3% of 783,564 whites were incarcerated for illegal drugs....whereas 44.6% of 371,248 blacks were incarerated. That is a glaring disproportional disparity than only a blind man couldn't see.

 

[VanceMack]

But as above, it's hardly surprising when people who are accustomed to privilege all their lives and must make do without it confuse it from actual discrimination.

Please...tell us more about this 'privilege' thing that you speak of...

 

[P. Kersey]

Didn't you see the percentages I posted? Apparently, you didn't understand what you looking at.

69.4% of all crime is commited by whites and only 28.4% is commited by blacks.

That is a far cry from the "half" that you are claiming.

I said violent crime..not ALL crime.

Whites commit far more violent crimes than blacks including violent rape (9,504 to 4,811) and sex crime against children (38,422 to 13,189) and drug abuse violations (783,564 to 371,248).

What percentage of the population are blacks? 13%..so see how this works? Negroes commit a hugely disproportionate amount of crime despite only being a fraction of the population...and those numbers aren't accurate anyway. I'll post the real FBI numbers for you in a minute.

Yet blacks are 39.4% of the prison population compared to whites (29.3%).How is that possible?

They commit a hugely disproportionate amount of crime despite only being a fraction of the population.

Are blacks getting fair sentencings compared to whites? No, they are not. In fact, blacks are getting much harsher sentences for non violent crime such as possession of marijuana than whites are.

How many of them are multiple offenders? multiple offense = harsher sentence. See how that works?

So what happens when a young black man is sent to prison for such minor offenses as marijuana? Well, for one thing, it ruins his entire life because now he has a felony record and he can't get a job or go to college.

White people experience the same results.

So if you want to blame someone...blame whites for passing harsh sentencing laws that disproportionally incarcerates far more blacks than whites and forces them into a life of crime.

No black legislator has ever been involved in writing drug laws is your contention?...and negroes are "forced" to commit crimes by white people..OK..got it..

5.(State Prisons, Drug Offenders by Race) The most serious offense for 237,000 sentenced prisoners in state facilities at the end of 2010 was a conviction involving illegal drugs. Of this total: 69,500 (29.3%) were non-Hispanic white, 105,600 (44.6%) were non-Hispanic black and 47,800 (20.2%) were Hispanic.....
Race and Prison | Drug War Facts


29.3% of 783,564 whites were incarcerated for illegal drugs....whereas 44.6% of 371,248 blacks were incarerated. That is a glaring disproportional disparity than only a blind man couldn't see.

Again...how many of those were for a multiple offense? Again...2nd or 3rd offense = harsher sentence.

Don't commit crime is the best advice I can give.


Here are some accurate stats according to population and race. You'll notice a hugely disproportionate number of blacks are represented.

Remember, percentage is the key. According to the raw data, USUALLY whites commit more crime..but notice that as a smaller percentage of the population more crimes are committed by blacks

Fewer blacks but higher numbers, see?

http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_43.html
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_49.html
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_55.html
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_61.html
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_67.html

Here are the 2010 stats
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/table-43

Here are some more stats from solid, reliable, thoroughly researched and verified sources.


Statistics
*More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year. Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks.
*About 1 million Whites were murdered, robbed, assaulted, or raped by Blacks in 1992
*In the last 30 years, 170 million violent and nonviolent crimes were committed by Blacks against Whites in the U.S.
*Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than Whites, although they comprise only one-seventh of the White population.
*27 million nonviolent crimes were committed in the U.S. in 1992 alone. 31% of the robberies involved Black offenders and White victims; only 2% involved White offenders and Black victims.

The above stats were collected by an Australian reporter, Neil Sheehan, who dug out half-concealed U.S. crime figures for an article in the Sydney Morning Herald (May 2, 1995). The contents of his article, he commented, could not possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream media.

Paved With Good Intentions, a book by Jared Taylor, also studies crime statistics by race. It must be stressed that Blacks make up only 12% of the population according to the 1990 U.S. census (and Black males about 6%), but they commit a vastly disproportionate number of violent crime.

Mr. Taylor reveals:
1) 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are Blacks.
2) 46% of all arrests for violent crimes are Blacks.
3) 73% of all “justified self-defense” killings are committed by Blacks.
4) 60.5% of all Blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all times.
5) 98% of all youths arrested for gun fights in Atlanta are Blacks.


These are FEDERAL statistics verified by the Department of Justice.


*Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
*Blacks are three times more likely to use a hand gun, and twice more likely to use a knife.
*Blacks are 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites then vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit a robbery.
*Forty-five percent of black crime is against whites, 43 against other blacks, and 10 percent against Hispanic.





The Color of Crime: Race, Crime, and Justice in America. Second, Expanded Edition, 2005

http://colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html

Major Findings:

Police and the justice system are not biased against minorities.

Crime Rates

Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.
The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.

Interracial Crime

Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

Gangs

Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.
Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.

Incarceration

Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.
Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.

The Color of Crime is an expanded version of a monograph on crime first published by NCF in 1999.

Top 10 most dangerous cities in America 2013
1. Camden, New Jersey (Population 77, 344) (17.59% Caucasian, 48.07% African American, 34.34% Other Race) ($27,027)

2. Detroit, Michigan (Population 713,777) ( 10.6% Caucasian, 82.7% African American, 6.7% Other Race) ($25,787)

3. Atlanta, Georgia (Population 420,003) ( 38.4% Caucasian, 54% African American, 7.6% Other Race) ($35,453)

4. St. Louis, Missouri (Population 319,294) ( 43.9% Caucasian, 49.2% African American, 6.9% Other Race) ($29,159)

5. Gary, Indiana (Population 80,294) ( 11.92% Caucasian, 84.03% African American, 4.05% Other Race) ($27,195)

6. Washington, DC (Population 617,996) ( 38.5% Caucasian, 50.7% African American, 10.8% Other Race) ($55,755)

7. Hartford, Connecticut (Population 124,775) ( 18.72% Caucasian, 40.05% African American, 41.23% Other Race) ($20,820)

8. New Orleans, Louisiana (Population 343,829) ( 33% Caucasian, 60.2% African American, 6.8% Other Race) ($24,929)

9. Richmond, Virginia (Population 204,214) ( 41.6% Caucasian, 52.3% African American, 6.1% Other Race) ($31,121)

10. Birmingham, Alabama (Population 212,237) ( 35.07% Caucasian, 62.46% African American, 2.47% Other Race) ($26,735)

Dishonorable Mention: Chicago, Illinois (Population 2,695,598) (45.0% Caucasian, 32.9% African American, 22.1% Other Race) ($38,625)
Read more at Top 10 most dangerous cities in America 2013
Top 10 Safest cities in the US 2013
Top 10 Safest cities in the US 2013
1. Newton, Massachusetts (Population 85,146) (79.6% Caucasian, 2.5% African American, 17.9% Other Race) ($112,230)

2. Brick Township, New Jersey (Population 75,072) ( 93.05% Caucasian, 2% African American, 4.95% Other Race) ($65,129)

3. Amherst, New York (Population 122,366) ( 83.8% Caucasian, 5.7% African American, 10.5% Other Race) ($55,427)

4. Mission Viejo, California (Population 93,305) ( 79.8% Caucasian, 1.3% African American, 18.9% Other Race) ($93,330)

5. Clarkstown, New York (Population 84,187) ( 79.97% Caucasian, 7.87% African American, 12.16% Other Race) ($92,121)

6. Lake Forest, California (Population 77,264) ( 70.3% Caucasian, 1.7% African American, 28% Other Race) ($86,285)

7. Thousand Oaks, California (Population 126,683) ( 80.3% Caucasian, 1.3% African American, 18.4% Other Race) ($101,120)

8. Colonie, New York (Population 81,591) ( 90.55% Caucasian, 3.96% African American, 5.85% Other Race) ($51,817)

9. Cary, North Carolina (Population 135,234) ( 73.1% Caucasian, 8% African American, 18.9% Other Race) ($83,292)

10. Toms River, New Jersey (Population 91,239) ( 89.91% Caucasian, 2.7% African American, 7.39% Other Race) ($71,934)

First of all, it is important to mention the USA 2010 census data*, according to which:
Whites constitute 72.4% of the population
Blacks constitute 12.6% of the population
The ratio is thus 5.75:1

1. Rape:

The rape rates, from the years 1996 to 2008, can be found here:
1. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/c...ous/cvus42.pdf
2. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/c...ent/cv0842.pdf

The averages for all the years are as follows:
All victims: 219,372
White victims: 180,560
Black victims: 38,812
-----------------------------
All white rapists: 131,351
All black rapists: 52,908
White on black rapists: 1,869
Black on white rapists: 21,401

It is thus:
- 14.28 times more likely that any woman will be raped by a black man than a white man.

- 65.82 times more likely that a white woman will be raped by a black man than a black woman by a white man.

Some interesting observations:
For the years 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, there were ZERO white on black rapes reported.
When during 2003 to 2008 white men raped zero black women, blacks raped 131,413 white women and 148,343 black women!

In 2005, blacks even outnumbered whites on the number of rapes! 74,080 rapes were committed by blacks, whereas only 49,613 were committed by whites! That is 1.49 times more or 8,57 times more in proportion to the demographics.

2. Homicide by strangers:

The homicide rates** where the offenders were strangers, from the years 1976 to 2005, can be found here, on page 72:
http://bjsdata.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/htius.pdf

The averages for all the years are as follows:
White on white stranger homicides: 41.64%
White on black stranger homicides: 5.08%
Black on black stranger homicides: 33.23%
Black on white stranger homicides: 18.77%

It is thus:
- 6.4 times more likely that any person will be murdered by a black stranger than a white stranger.

- 21.25 times more likely that a white person will be murdered by a black stranger than a black person by a white stranger.

One can also see that blacks commit more than half of all stranger murders, when they are only 12.6% of the population.

*Keep in mind that in the USA, Arabs and other Semites, as well as Mexicans and other non-white Hispanics and mixed people are considered "white," so whites constituted only about 60-65% of the population in 2010, and it is not known how many of the "white on white," "white on black" or even "black on white" cases were actually white offenders or victims.

**These figures differ when you also take homicides by acquaintances into account, which is irrelevant to the point I'm making here, that it is far more likely you will be killed by some random black on the street than by a random white person, thus profiling is completely justified and logical.

 

[Buck Ewer]

You being a progressive should agree with many of Buchanan's opinions especially on race and ethnicities. Come on, the progressives conducted the most comprehensive study in America's history, five years to complete, 80 volumes on race, ethnicity and American immigration. Have todays new progressives gone neo-progressive ?

Do you have a problem that Buchcanan is some what of a nationalist (patriot) ? But wait a second, American progressives have always been extremely nationalistic until very recently. Why is that, what happened ?

BTW:
My profile may indicate that I'm very conservative but I'm a few feet to the left of Buchanan.

There is nothing ... repeat, nothing progressive about the racist swine Pat Buchanan.
You are delusional.

 

[APACHERAT]

Technically he is half correct as AA laws only mention minority groups, women, persons with disabilities, and covered veterans. So basically any healthy white male that is not a veteran can be legally discriminated against.

You forgot about Obama's Catch-22 when it comes to veterans. Any vet who served more than one combat tour in Iraq or Afghanistan have been labeled by the Obama administration as being a possible terrorist.

 

[APACHERAT]

There is nothing ... repeat, nothing progressive about the racist swine Pat Buchanan.
You are delusional.

Please provide the definition for racist that you are using. This is a word that has been corrupted by the socialist and others over the years to further their political agenda of dividing America.

Could you list some of Pat Buchanan's comments that you consider to be racist ?

 

[Buck Ewer]

Please provide the definition for racist that you are using. This is a word that has been corrupted by the socialist and others over the years to further their political agenda of dividing America.

Could you list some of Pat Buchanan's comments that you consider to be racist ?

a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

From his last book;

From the Preface:

When the faith dies, the culture dies, the civilization dies, the people die. That is the progression. And as the faith that gave birth to the West is dying in the West, peoples of European descent from the steppes of Russia to the coast of California have begun to die out, as the Third World treks north to claim the estate. The last decade provided corroborating if not conclusive proof that we are in the Indian summer of our civilization.
From the chapter, “The Death Of Christian America”:

Obama’s White House thus enlisted in the long and successful campaign to expel Christianity from the public square, diminish its presence in our public life, and reduce its role to that of just another religion.
From the chapter, “The End Of White America”:

The white population will begin to shrink and, should present birth rates persist, slowly disappear. Hispanics already comprise 42 percent of New Mexico’s population, 37 percent of California’s, 38 percent of Texas’s, and over half the population of Arizona under the age of twenty. ……. Mexico is moving north. Ethnically, linguistically, and culturally, the verdict of 1848 is being overturned. Will this Mexican nation within a nation advance the goals of the Constitution—to “insure domestic tranquility” and “make us a more perfect union”? Or has our passivity in the face of this invasion imperiled our union?
On the group UNITY: Journalists of Color, Inc. pushing for more diversity in journalism:

Half a century after Martin Luther King envisioned a day when his children would be judged ‘not by the color of their skin, but the content of their character,’ journalists of color are demanding the hiring and promotion of journalists based on the color of their skin. Jim Crow is back. Only the color of the beneficiaries and the color of the victims have been reversed.
Also from the chapter, “The End Of White America”:

Those who believe the rise to power of an Obama rainbow coalition of peoples of color means the whites who helped to engineer it will steer it are deluding themselves. The whites may discover what it is like to ride in the back of the bus.
From the chapter, “Equality or Freedom?”:

Not until the 1960s did courts begin to use the Fourteenth Amendment to impose a concept of equality that the authors of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, The Federalist Papers, and the Gettysburg Address never believed in. Before the 1960s, equality meant every citizen enjoyed the same constitutional rights and the equal protection of existing laws. Nothing in the Constitution or federal law mandated social, racial, or gender equality.
From the chapter “The Diversity Cult”:

Americans who seek stricter immigration control have been charged with many social sins: racism, xenophobia, nativism. Yet none has sought to expel any fellow American based on color or creed. We have only sought to preserve the country we grew up in. Do not people everywhere do that, without being reviled? What motivates people who insist that America’s doors be held open wide until the European majority has disappeared?
What is their grudge against the old America that eats at their heart?

On crime:

If [conservative political commentator Heather] Mac Donald’s statistics are accurate, 49 of every 50 muggings and murders in New York are the work of minorities. That might explain why black folks have trouble getting a cab. Every New York cabby must know the odds, should he pick up a man of color at night.
From the chapter “‘The White Party’”:

What the above points to is a strategy from which Republicans will recoil, a strategy to increase the GOP share of the white Christian vote and increase the turnout of that vote by specific appeals to social, cultural, and moral issues, and for equal justice for the emerging white minority. If the GOP is not the party of New Haven firefighter Frank Ricci and Cambridge cop James Crowley, it has no future. And although Howard Dean disparages the Republicans as the “white party,” why should Republicans be ashamed to represent the progeny of the men who founded, built, and defended America since her birth as a nation?
From the chapter “The Last Chance”:

Our intellectual, cultural, and political elites are today engaged in one of the most audacious and ambitious experiments in history. They are trying to transform a Western Christian republic into an egalitarian democracy made up of all the tribes, races, creeds, and cultures of planet Earth. They have dethroned our God, purged our cradle faith from public life, and repudiated the Judeo-Christian moral code by which previous generations sought to live.
From the same chapter:

For the Left to concede that white anger is a legitimate response to racial injustices done to white people would be to concede that the Left is guilty of the very sin of which it accuses the right.
On the segregation era:

Perhaps some of us misremember the past. But the racial, religious, cultural, social, political, and economic divides today seem greater than they seemed even in the segregation cities some of us grew up in.
Back then, black and white lived apart, went to different schools and churches, played on different playgrounds, and went to different restaurants, bars, theaters, and soda fountains. But we shared a country and a culture. We were one nation. We were Americans.

 

[Moot]

I said violent crime..not ALL crime.

I said ALL crime and that includes 'violent crime', too.

 

[APACHERAT]

a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

Looks like a copy and paste from the Progressives "Dillingham Commision" study.

 

[APACHERAT]

From his last book;

All is see are historical facts. When has the truth become racist ?

 

[P. Kersey]

I said ALL crime and that includes 'violent crime', too.

hahahaha..that is weak..and desperate. Jaywalking is a "crime" and it is nonviolent. Spitting on the sidewalk is a "crime" in some places. You're dodging.


Negroes commit OVER HALF of ALL violent crime in the u.s. despite only being 13% of the population. You ok with that?

Over 90% of black males murdered are murdered by other black males..that doesn't bother you?
You hate blacks and it's ok with you if they kill each other at those rates? Is that it?

I see you are desperately trying to find a way out of the corner you painted yourself into without having to acknowledge the truth.