• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whites Are the Only Group That You Can Discriminate Against Legally in America

Deflection?
Tell me? How many negroes are held as slaves in america today?

Does slavery occur in africa today?

Do you think it's a good practice?

I love this meme! Pretend that putative slavery in Africa today has anything to do with America's history of slavery and depauperization of US blacks.

Wonderful attempt at deflection!

But it won't work. Poor conservatives and their deepseated hatred of minorities. It's sad really.
 
LMAO..americans didn't capture anybody.

BWHAHAHHAHHAH!

I love this rightwing meme! Whatever you do, pretend Americans weren't responsible for slavery in America! This is such wonderful teabaggery. I hope the GOP runs on this!
 
I love this meme! Pretend that putative slavery in Africa today has anything to do with America's history of slavery and depauperization of US blacks.

Wonderful attempt at deflection!

But it won't work. Poor conservatives and their deepseated hatred of minorities. It's sad really.

That's all great. Chant those slogans..
Now;

How many negroes are held as slaves in america today?

Does slavery occur in africa today?

Do you think it's a good practice?
 
BWHAHAHHAHHAH!

I love this rightwing meme! Whatever you do, pretend Americans weren't responsible for slavery in America! This is such wonderful teabaggery. I hope the GOP runs on this!


americans didn't capture any slaves in africa.

africans sold their own people into slavery.
 
Buchanan has rendered himself irrelevant to the point that nothing he says is noticed by anybody but his own right wing sympathizers. The only heads spinning are their own.

It explains why more than half of Americans are either uninformed or misinformed. Isn't that how Obama got elected ?

For over forty years Pat Buchanan has a pretty good track record. Most of his predictions and or warnings have already happened or are happening.

Just because a few Marxist and other socialist have labeled Buchanan a racist, you shouldn't take their word for being true. Marxist and socialist call anyone who may interfere with their agenda racist. The extreme left always play the race card any time anyone tries to defend a nation's culture, customs and language.
 
americans didn't capture any slaves in africa.

africans sold their own people into slavery.

Na. Whites only paid for them. That must make it OK.
 
It explains why more than half of Americans are either uninformed or misinformed. Isn't that how Obama got elected ?

For over forty years Pat Buchanan has a pretty good track record. Most of his predictions and or warnings have already happened or are happening.

Just because a few Marxist and other socialist have labeled Buchanan a racist, you shouldn't take their word for being true. Marxist and socialist call anyone who may interfere with their agenda racist. The extreme left always play the race card any time anyone tries to defend a nation's culture, customs and language.
Yeah. Pat Buchanan, sage with his finger on the pulse. He'd make a much better president than Obama. :roll:
 
BWHAHAHHAHHAH!

I love this rightwing meme! Whatever you do, pretend Americans weren't responsible for slavery in America! This is such wonderful teabaggery. I hope the GOP runs on this!

So the head of joaquin believes there wasn't any slavery in America before 1776. Sounds like revisionism to me.

Head of joaquin, being something else hiding behind the progressive label gives the African slave trade a complete pass and ignores the present slave trade taking place today in Africa.
 
I posted the real inventors names and patent numbers. I did the research for you and proved you wrong. Now you're just making excuses and evade the discussion. When I'm wrong I can admit it. Can you?
Since you're so interested in history how can you perpetuate those lies from that site you used as a source? Why do you think it's ok to knowingly teach children lies about history?

But this is why you will fail with all of your anti-Black rhetorical hate speech. No matter what aYOU say, the historical record AND the US Patent Office say differently. Moreover, for all of your put-downs of Blacks you've demostrated NOTHING as a solution to what you view as the problem. THIS, by far IS the problem with the Republican Party where Blacks are concerned. Your side may talk some good game about freedom and liberty and posterity but for whom? For YOU? For your kind? Just listen to yourself! Not one of your posts has been about solutions, not one about improving the situation. Instead, it's been one rant filled bitch-fest after another, condemnation after condemnation. And WE - Blacks, Hispanics, gays, lesbians and women in general are suppose to "come on over to the old White man's side?" Really?

Do yourself a favor, take Gov. Jindal's advice and STOP BEI G STUPID! Better yet, I'll go you one better: SET ASIDE YOUR USELESS HATE!
 
Last edited:
What fool said slavery was ok?..or are you just making things up again?

Well, comments like "Americans didn't capture any slaves in Africa."

And, "Africans sold their own people into slavery."

Lead one to believe that someone is saying the slave trade was more the fault of blacks than whites.
 
But this is why you will fail with all of your anti-Black rhetorical hate speech.

Incorrect. I posted the truth about the real inventors of the devices you claimed were invented by negroes. Mischaracterizing for dramatic effect doesn't change the facts.

No matter what aYOU say, the historical record AND the US Patent Office say differently.
Wrong. I posted the names of the real inventors,the dates and patent numbers of the devices in question.

Moreover, for all of your put-downs of Blacks you've demostrated NOTHING as a solution to what you view as the problem.

I didn't "put down" anyone. My "solution to the problem" is to admit the truth and not give credit to people who didn't invent the things you claim.

THIS, by far IS the problem with the Republican Party where Blacks are concerned.
The republican party isn't the one who made false claims about negroes inventing things they didn't.

Your side may talk some good game about freedom and liberty and posterity but for whom? For YOU? For your kind?
What is "my side"?
What is "my kind"?

Just listen to yourself! Not one of your posts has been about solutions, not one about improving the situation.
I told you the "solution is to stop pretending negroes invented things that they didn't. What other "solutions" are you looking for here?

Instead, it's been one rant filled bitch-fest after another, con demnation after condemnation. And WE - Blacks, Hispanics, gays, lesbians and women I general are suppose to "come on over to the old White man's side?" Really?

No. I pointed out that you were either ignorant of the facts of who invented those devices or if you really knew, purposely lying.

Do yourself a favor, take Gov. Jindal's advice and STOP BEI G STUPID!

LMAO..jindal? Yeah..he's reliable...:roll: His name isn't even "Bobby" his first name is "Piyush"..he took the name bobby because he liked the kid on the brady bunch tv show, first of all and second, not everyone looks to politicians for guidance...only a statist fool would look to them expecting truth and honesty.

Better yet, I'll go you one better: SET ASIDE YOUR USELESS HATE!

Settle down. relax..I don't hate anyone.
 
Well, comments like "Americans didn't capture any slaves in Africa."

And, "Africans sold their own people into slavery."

Lead one to believe that someone is saying the slave trade was more the fault of blacks than whites.

Sorry..I know you don't like it, but americans didn't capture slaves in africa and africans did sell their own people into slavery.(the ones they didn't want for themselves)
If you interpret any of that as saying slavery is ok, you're either lying on purpose to be dramatic or severely deluded and biased.

Once again;
Since you despise slavery, when are you leaving for africa to make them stop practicing slavery today? Book your reservation and go fight a real problem.
 
It explains why more than half of Americans are either uninformed or misinformed. Isn't that how Obama got elected ?

For over forty years Pat Buchanan has a pretty good track record. Most of his predictions and or warnings have already happened or are happening.

Just because a few Marxist and other socialist have labeled Buchanan a racist, you shouldn't take their word for being true. Marxist and socialist call anyone who may interfere with their agenda racist. The extreme left always play the race card any time anyone tries to defend a nation's culture, customs and language.

Got it. Anybody who does not vote or think like you do is a Marxist or a Marxist tool or just plain stupid. :doh:roll:
 
americans didn't capture any slaves in africa.

africans sold their own people into slavery.

Good afternoon, P. Kersey. :2wave:

True. Why don't we hear about that part of slavery from Sharpton and company?

Besides, there is not one person alive today that took part in something that happened hundreds of years ago, so other than blaming others for both the selling and the buying that took place way back then, maybe people should focus on the opportunities afforded by this country in education and opportunity for advancement due to one's own efforts! What would their lives be like if they were still in Africa today? :shock:
 
Got it. Anybody who does not vote or think like you do is a Marxist or a Marxist tool or just plain stupid. :doh:roll:

And that's how you comprehended what I posted ? Interesting.

But Marxist and radical leftist do love stupid people, they are easy to manipulate with misinformation.
 
Good afternoon, P. Kersey. :2wave:

True. Why don't we hear about that part of slavery from Sharpton and company?

Besides, there is not one person alive today that took part in something that happened hundreds of years ago, so other than blaming others for both the selling and the buying that took place way back then, maybe people should focus on the opportunities afforded by this country in education and opportunity for advancement due to one's own efforts! What would their lives be like if they were still in Africa today? :shock:

Hi ya mate!

Exactly right...
 
Stop pretending. The argument your suggesting is that if we take action as a society to take into consideration 200 years of oppression, exclusion, theft and deprivation against blacks, it's somehow discriminating against whites. And like I say, that's simply a subterranean form of racism.

I don't know what the best policy is for dealing with the continuing effects of 200 years of virulent racism against blacks (affirmative action seems like a mild and reasonable response which has worked well). But claiming anything that deals with it is "discriminatory" is a dishonest argument, and I'm calling you on it.

I didn't suggest any of that and I certainly didn't make the claim in your last sentence. All I said was that I don't agree with discriminating against anyone based on the color of their skin. Everything else are assumptions on your part.
 
So the head of joaquin believes there wasn't any slavery in America before 1776. Sounds like revisionism to me.

Head of joaquin, being something else hiding behind the progressive label gives the African slave trade a complete pass and ignores the present slave trade taking place today in Africa.

Hey kids, another non sequitur meant to deflect from the fact that slavery in the US -- and 100 years of segregation, which was nothing but theft -- had an impact on blacks and their economic status even today!

O for fun!
 
I didn't suggest any of that and I certainly didn't make the claim in your last sentence. All I said was that I don't agree with discriminating against anyone based on the color of their skin. Everything else are assumptions on your part.

It's an assumption based on the well-trod rhetoric and tropes of the right regarding this issue. If it's wrong, you can clarify, instead of acting hurt.
 
It's an assumption based on the well-trod rhetoric and tropes of the right regarding this issue. If it's wrong, you can clarify, instead of acting hurt.

You made assumptions about what I said without me ever saying them and now you want me to clarify my never saying them?

It was very clear and simple I said discrimination based on color is wrong. Do you disagree with that?
 
Well, comments like "Americans didn't capture any slaves in Africa."

And, "Africans sold their own people into slavery."

Lead one to believe that someone is saying the slave trade was more the fault of blacks than whites.

The more frustrating thing is that both statements are wrong, both are two broad, certain black people and certain white people...the ones who were actually involved in the slave trade were at fault.
 
The more frustrating thing is that both statements are wrong, both are two broad, certain black people and certain white people...the ones who were actually involved in the slave trade were at fault.

If we add to that those who condoned it, we have a winner.
 
Back
Top Bottom