- Joined
- Dec 12, 2016
- Messages
- 42,502
- Reaction score
- 19,283
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Because they were human beings worthy of dignity and respect, and would be affected by any decision.Why should they?
Lees
Because they were human beings worthy of dignity and respect, and would be affected by any decision.Why should they?
Lees
Post #182Context?
Affirmative action was about leveling the playing field, not about superiority. . Now, you don't even think black people should be treat the same as whites, so you're going to think affirmative action is bad regardless. So, we're at a stalemate there. White people have many more opportunities to be granted admission in schools based on something other than academic merit (see my post regarding athletic recruits and ALDC admissions).@blur Concerning your post #(616)
Of course they do. They represent two different races. So you think the NAACP doesn't think blacks are superior when they get preferential treatment over whites? Affirmative Action. Segregation doesn't mean 'superior'. It just whites want to live with their own kind, just like blacks do.
Not an opinion, the NAACP does not treat white people as inferior so I have no reason to believe they are racist. It's that simple. You're simply protecting racism onto to them to excuse your own, but again, you offer no evidence.So, you're expressing an opinion. No shortage of stupid whites to support black racist groups. That doesn't mean the NAACP is not racist. It is. It is not about helping the white race. It's about destroying the white race and it uses stupid whites to help do it. At least the NAAWP doesn't try and present a facade like the NAACP does. Why should the NAAWP hand out any awards to any blacks?
The Supreme Court also decided numerous cases that lead to Dred Scott being overturned. You can't play "appeal to authority" if you're going to cherry-pick when you decide to listen to that authority.Bullshit. The Dred Scott decision was given by the Supreme Court. Your approval of it matters not one bit. It doesn't matter what Washington said. What mattered was the Supreme Court decision. No matter how you cut it, color it, the North was the traitor, not the South. Traitor to benefit the negro. Gee, that is supposed to make it right and the South wrong. What hypocrisy.
Never claimed Lincoln was not racist or that he is a "great idol", you're just debating one of your fantasies now.In other words, Lincoln didn't give a shit about the slaves. The Emancipatin Proclamtion was just a war measure to be used against the South. If Lincoln had no authority to free the slaves in the North, then neither did he have any authortiy to free any slaves in the South. But, at least you admit, the South obeyed the Constitution. And the hypocritical North that attacked the South for it's slaves, would not free their own slaves. Lincoln supported the orignal 13th amendment also, which would enslave blacks forever. Proving Lincoln, your great idol, didn't give a shit about blacks. Blacks and slavery were just a problem forced on him. Glory, glory...hallelujah...
You need to read more carefully: The literacy crisis is referring specifically to Grade 4 children , not the overall population. The literacy rate for South Africa is still 95%. Nice try though.Well, I give you a reference and you just refuse to see it. Why should I give you more? Literacy in South Africa is declining. Just google that sentence. See UWC, 'Addressing South African Literacy Crisis' Gee, Africa is so great.
The quote is from this post: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/white-privilege.570294/post-1081597922I explained that when I gave it. And what post was that? And I gave you other references which you refuse to look at.
Right, she said it in the 90s in a "letter to the editor." She did not write it in the 1619 Project, and it is not being taught in schools (the quote).That is what you're saying. That is not what the author said that I gave the quote from. I gave the quote and referenced it.
I mean, yes. That is how it is being measured.
Like 13% of the population, but accounts for upwards of 50% of violent crime. ... etc etc
This doesn't make senseWhiteness needs no enemy. In fact, the enemy needs whiteness, thus the name. Otherwise it wouldn't be called anything, it simply would be.
More racist rambles that mean nothing but racismThe stuff you mention certainly did happen, in order to justify keeping a second class citizen, second class (or none at all). However, that is not in today's world and hasn't been for quite some time. Opportunities exist for all, if they are willing to grasp them, take responsibility for themselves and get to work.
I don't care what problems they encounter. We all face problems.
In fact, that is what personal responsibility does. It put the onus on SELF to fix/overcome/prioritize/succeed/ or fail.
Sans that though, you have groups clamoring to EXCUSE and justify the failings, and bad characteristics that lead to failure.
So tell us, how has Affirmative Action helped white women?….(grabs popcorn)
You're not addressing the specific example I offered. I didn't mention anything about "hiring" someone, I'm talking about accommodations in the workplace/school that help people with disabilities do their work. Do you think that's discrimination?
Many DEI programs included Veterans:
![]()
Federal VITAL Program Delivers Extensive Campus Support to Student Veterans | Insight Into Academia
Many higher education institutions offer support to active military and veteran students through designated offices and personnel, but these individuals may still need to go off campus to receive additional services through their local Veterans Affairs (VA) facility. A growing number of...www.insightintodiversity.com
Atlantic Cape Community College Libraries: Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) Resource Toolkit: Veterans
Atlantic Cape Community College Libraries: Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) Resource Toolkit: Veteranslibrary.atlanticcape.edu
Those services are available to everyone, but DEI allowed for specialized care that helped Veterans as their circumstances can be different than your average student. Not all mental health professionals are equipped to deal with all kinds of mental health issues, and special training can be required to deal with more specific ones. Mental health professionals on campus would collaborate with local VA hospitals to better help provide the proper care and resources to Veterans who might be dealing with PTSD or complex guilt or other issues more prevalent among Veterans. Additionally, there are many programs set up for Veterans to enter into different career paths, the DEI programs helped ensure that these programs would be offered to Veterans.
Absolutely. But many wealthy people inherit their wealth, and then may even accrue more wealth on top of it. For example, most billionaires in 2023 inherited their wealth as opposed to earned it: https://www.investopedia.com/more-b...heritance-overtaking-entrepreneurship-8409800
Shouldn't stop anyone from working hard, but many don't have to work hard to get it.
....
I have spent the better part of our discussion giving you stats on black students attending Ivy League schools. Where did you get that I thought that Ivy League schools were "white only"?
Black people face more obstacles in obtaining wealth than white people. So, it is still a race problem. You still have answered my question, do you think it's fine for recruited athletes to have admission preference? How about students from low-income backgrounds? Or students who's parents are faculty?
I'm not calling it "discrimination." I'm saying there are disadvantages to being a minority in a country even if you are among the majority in a town. I'm not blaming anyone, I'm just statin that is a fact, and that minorities deserve to have their needs taken care of even if they do not reflect the needs of the majority.
if you give them weighted preferences based on ______________ its discrimination that's DEI
don't hire someone because they're got a disability .... hire them because they're the best for the job
that's not DEI all that is available for everyone isn't it ?
Context?
@blur Concerning your post #(616)
Of course they do. They represent two different races. So you think the NAACP doesn't think blacks are superior when they get preferential treatment over whites? Affirmative Action. Segregation doesn't mean 'superior'. It just whites want to live with their own kind, just like blacks do.
So, you're expressing an opinion. No shortage of stupid whites to support black racist groups. That doesn't mean the NAACP is not racist. It is. It is not about helping the white race. It's about destroying the white race and it uses stupid whites to help do it. At least the NAAWP doesn't try and present a facade like the NAACP does. Why should the NAAWP hand out any awards to any blacks?
Bullshit. The Dred Scott decision was given by the Supreme Court. Your approval of it matters not one bit. It doesn't matter what Washington said. What mattered was the Supreme Court decision. No matter how you cut it, color it, the North was the traitor, not the South. Traitor to benefit the negro. Gee, that is supposed to make it right and the South wrong. What hypocrisy.
In other words, Lincoln didn't give a shit about the slaves. The Emancipatin Proclamtion was just a war measure to be used against the South. If Lincoln had no authority to free the slaves in the North, then neither did he have any authortiy to free any slaves in the South. But, at least you admit, the South obeyed the Constitution. And the hypocritical North that attacked the South for it's slaves, would not free their own slaves. Lincoln supported the orignal 13th amendment also, which would enslave blacks forever. Proving Lincoln, your great idol, didn't give a shit about blacks. Blacks and slavery were just a problem forced on him. Glory, glory...hallelujah...
Well, I give you a reference and you just refuse to see it. Why should I give you more? Literacy in South Africa is declining. Just google that sentence. See UWC, 'Addressing South African Literacy Crisis' Gee, Africa is so great.
I explained that when I gave it. And what post was that? And I gave you other references which you refuse to look at.
That is what you're saying. That is not what the author said that I gave the quote from. I gave the quote and referenced it.
Lees
Any wealth accumulated through the ownership of homes and passed down through the family, which is quite a bit, is an example of white privilege.
Giving weighted preference based on skin color or lack there if, is the USA. That's how it was founded and how it continues to work to this day. If hiring managers are racist, they will always find a way to work around any so-called policy like DEI/Affirmative Action. Racists always find a way...how you think they got control of the planet? They cared about treaties, kingdoms and policies then? Lol. Racists run the government, companies, hiring teams and everything in between.
Thus in most cases, Black people are best for the job. Overqualified but banned. Now what was the exact year where racists said they not gonna be racist anymore? I must have missed that meeting. Post it.
Nowhere will you find racists refusing to be racist, that's all they know, live, and will die for. Racism. If this country was based on equality, then Black people would run circles around whites. Let's just face the facts. That is why there is so much fear about a practically non-existent DEI & nonexistent Affirmative Action because many whites know that Black people are already outperforming them and don't deserve any extra help.
I get it. I don't agree, but I get the fear when I really sit and think about it.
Stop playing the victim and do like Black people did and start your own businesses.
Also, whites should work harder and study harder so that they will be the best for any job or college admission. But honest, hard work is not something that is embedded in this nation's white identity. If it were, this country and all the Americas would still belong to its original inhabitants. Even today Native Polynesians (Hawaii) have been trying to get their land back for years.
White have invented nothing except for race and they are thus brilliant at racism, I must admit.
Thanks! Media literacy is a big part of the problem as well. People don’t read books or articles, they just scroll through YouTube getting rage-baited, and think they’re receiving some kind of an objective view because it’s not the “mainstream media.”You are doing an amazing job with your posts! The problem is that people don't want to truly learn. Most people use the Internet to provoke and rage bait. I hate it and why I can't deal with social media. They don't care about learning and got the nerve to wonder why kids are struggling in school? Like really, you got whole grown folks who refuse to decipher peer reviewed sources using their own minds and own theories.
So much for those high literacy rates. Literacy does not equal comprehension
Affirmative action was about leveling the playing field, not about superiority. . Now, you don't even think black people should be treat the same as whites, so you're going to think affirmative action is bad regardless. So, we're at a stalemate there. White people have many more opportunities to be granted admission in schools based on something other than academic merit (see my post regarding athletic recruits and ALDC admissions).
Not an opinion, the NAACP does not treat white people as inferior so I have no reason to believe they are racist. It's that simple. You're simply protecting racism onto to them to excuse your own, but again, you offer no evidence.
The Supreme Court also decided numerous cases that lead to Dred Scott being overturned. You can't play "appeal to authority" if you're going to cherry-pick when you decide to listen to that authority.
Never claimed Lincoln was not racist or that he is a "great idol", you're just debating one of your fantasies now.
You need to read more carefully: The literacy crisis is referring specifically to Grade 4 children , not the overall population. The literacy rate for South Africa is still 95%. Nice try though.
The quote is from this post: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/white-privilege.570294/post-1081597922
You never gave a source for it.
Right, she said it in the 90s in a "letter to the editor." She did not write it in the 1619 Project, and it is not being taught in schools (the quote).
Post Civil War? And have you considered what many of these lychings were for?
Why don't you address Lincoln's support of the original 13th amendment which would enslave blacks forever? Why should I view a memorial for peace in Mongomery Alabama. Oh you visited it. Did it give you goose bumps.
By flawed do you mean a murderer? By flawed do you mean a terrorist? My how these yankees love to change the words to fit their political motivation.
Slaves have no choice but accept their fate.
Corey Booker is just another black racist.
Lees
Note: The Aryan Brotherhood has offshoots and allies nationwide, including in rural areas and Southern states.
FALSE — here’s why that stat is flawed and twisted.
Think about it:
If you flood Black neighborhoods with police and ignore white crime in suburbs, of course you'll catch more Black people.
That’s not justice — that’s surveillance bias.
Correlation is not causation.
Example: Columbine, Sandy Hook, Las Vegas, Uvalde, Parkland — all white male shooters (with some exceptions in recent years, but still majority white).
Affirmative action was about leveling the playing field, not about superiority. . Now, you don't even think black people should be treat the same as whites, so you're going to think affirmative action is bad regardless. So, we're at a stalemate there. White people have many more opportunities to be granted admission in schools based on something other than academic merit (see my post regarding athletic recruits and ALDC admissions).
Not an opinion, the NAACP does not treat white people as inferior so I have no reason to believe they are racist. It's that simple. You're simply protecting racism onto to them to excuse your own, but again, you offer no evidence.
The Supreme Court also decided numerous cases that lead to Dred Scott being overturned. You can't play "appeal to authority" if you're going to cherry-pick when you decide to listen to that authority.
Never claimed Lincoln was not racist or that he is a "great idol", you're just debating one of your fantasies now.
You need to read more carefully: The literacy crisis is referring specifically to Grade 4 children , not the overall population. The literacy rate for South Africa is still 95%. Nice try though.
The quote is from this post: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/white-privilege.570294/post-1081597922
You never gave a source for it.
Right, she said it in the 90s in a "letter to the editor." She did not write it in the 1619 Project, and it is not being taught in schools (the quote).
You’re talking about a small minority of whites. A majority are successful.
I don't know that at all - its a studyThat's not at all what I'm saying. I think I'd great if you have a million dollar net worth, and I don't think it's "unfair." But you're not addressing the studies that I listed, which were comparing black and white people who were treated differently despite their similar/same circumstances. Everyone is responsible for their choices, but they are not necessarily always responsible for how they are treated.
Where did Biden say that?
I appreciate this discussion. I've learned a lot in the process. I do think we're having some issues with getting on the same page with what the other person is actually trying to say, so I hope to clarify.
not all DEI is helping handicap people and veterans eitherI'm giving you actual examples DEI programs. DEI and Affirmative Action are not the same.
as I'm said, wealth privilege is realNo lies. I said "many", not "most." On the topic of students getting into private schools, most are able to do so because of their parent's money (i.e. inherited wealth).
I was offering an example of instances where wealth is not earned.
I was speaking specifically to the example of healthcare: You can't "earn" your way out of sickle cell anemia. We shouldn't not put funding or research into it just because it doesn't impact the majority of the country, right? We should be trying to understand and help all demographics, because not all demographics experience the same things equally. Women, men, white, black, gay, straight, old, young, etc. We should have research and awareness raising for issues that impact the general population, and issues that are specific to particular demographics. Having research to better understand black health does not take away research to help understand white health. The reason why understanding the trends for particular demographics is important is because it allows doctors to inform their patients of conditions they might be more at risk for: black people are more at risk for sickle cell anemia, white people are more at risk for AFIB, and so on. But the research has to be targeted on specific demographics in-order for that kind of information to reach doctors.