• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White Liberals- Are They Next on the Chopping Block?

Are white liberals next on the chopping block of POC's scorn and hatred?


  • Total voters
    33
Which is more often than not derived from the fact that you're a native. Since you were born on a piece of land you have a greater sense of entitlement to it. Now in some cases, there is a degree of entitlement to land that is justified, but given that we took this land from the Native Americans in the first place we have little or no right to tell others they can't enjoy it as well.

Totally disagree. One of the worst things liberals have done in recent years has been to stoke a sense of entitlement in any outgroup that considers itself marginalized, whether that outgroup is native or not. Thus we have asshat criminals taking advantage of Sanctuary Cities because they look upon liberal policies as encouragements to criminal behavior.

Are they in the minority among immigrants? Maybe, but so are native criminals who go berserk and commit capital crimes-- all for the same motive, to get something for nothing.
 
I responded "yes" to the poll, though I think the tense is wrong: white liberals are already on the POC chopping block, and sometimes get even worse treatment than white conservatives.
 
The Euro-Jews in Israel are very close to being outnumbered by the Palestinians, going by the 2005 census. And Japan did squeeze all of the early Ainu people onto one island when they arrived in the islands, the better to establish their racial homogeneity.

Which doesn't mean white nationalism makes sense. Which white Christian culture gets preserved anyway? 100 years ago, Irish and Italians had distinct cultures even here. Both were white and Christian.
 
In all fairness to many liberals, however, they sincerely believe that it makes NO difference whatsoever which ethnicity becomes the major ethnicity in the United States of America. Therefore, many liberals do NOT mind the possibility that they will someday become "obsolete."

Why would you fear becoming a minority? Are they mistreated or something?

Why are white people the one group to be preserved? Do non-white people bother you?
 
You can't be bigotted towards bigotry.

Yet you people found a way to do so...

You hateful bigots should be proud of yourselves...

That's like saying someone is a coldblooded murder because they shot a mass shooter. If you shoot a mass shooter you're a hero. The fact that you used the same methods to kill the shooter that he was using to kill innocent people is irrelevant. He was the murderer and the instigator. You acted in the defense of the innocent.

Stereotyping Trump supporters as bigots.

Equating Trump supporters/****posters with mass shooters.

I don't know why they allow such hateful people, to post such hateful things...

Bigotry is immoral. You should always judge immoral people negatively.

You sir are a horrible bigot...
 
The post to which I responded implied that any imputation of irrational harassment to white liberals was some sort of straw man. I used Mao as an example of a de facto liberal (purely through being a Communist) who wanted to treat all of his citizens as if they were interchangeable.

Liberal =/= communist

And...So what? If you can find ANY "liberal" who believes this, quote them: "The idea that all humans have exactly equal amounts of potential, and are infinitely malleable..." No one in U.S. politics believes this that I've ever seen, and that includes liberals. So what's the point of fabricating that position then saying, "Most people who identify as liberal today have no idea they're just reciting the very poor logic of the man who birthed the largest genocidal regimes in history."

Fact is, no people who identify as liberal believe that BS, nor are they reciting the logic of Karl Marx by not asserting anything like that made up position.

Again, if you disagree, quote someone, anyone, with a name and a link so we can see what they believe in context.
 
To white Leftists:

For the past several years, you have been talking about how we white non-Leftists have been about white supremacy and racism without evidence to back it up. Especially when it comes to white males because not only is it race baiting and racist, but also sexist. You've called us every name in the book, likening us to dictators like Hitler and Stalin, and accused us of wanting to kill people through something as simple as tax cuts or believing in a faith that you don't share. Whenever we do one thing you don't agree with, you instantly call us racist or doing something racist. You say that we are the cause of minorities going to jail whenever some one from a minority group breaks the law, even though there is no evidence on that either. When it comes to the environment, you say that it is white conservatives that are destroying it. You even say that a border wall is somehow a show of white supremacy, although it is evident that many people of all colors and ethnicity (which includes Hispanics) want this wall to be built. You go as far as if a mass shooting happens it's because of us white non-Leftists. When a white supremacist does reveal themselves, that person says they are one of you, either through statements they make publicly or through a manifesto in complete detail, but despite those facts, you still blame it on us and claim this person is one of us non-Leftists. Everything you say about us is false, and what makes it worse is most of you know this, while some of you are simply brainwashed into believing this nonsense.

But now, look what's happening. These things that YOU said about us is coming back to bite you very hard. These lunatic fringe Leftists that YOU created, that happen to be a part of these minority groups, are starting to turn on YOU. They're going to start with the big names first. That's how they get a foothold. Then they're going to start noticing that YOU either living as nice a life as, or better than what, they are. That's a big no-no to them. They will see this as white privilege, a tactic and a false trait YOU pinned on us, where somehow a white person simply has more opportunity in life or some immunity to the law because we're white and the people that founded this country were white, and they made this country for white people. That's what YOU have them believing. Eventually, what will happen is groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter (or the equivalents of those groups), Leftist groups created by YOU and YOUR leaders, they will start attacking white members because YOU have them believing that white people are demons and that all white people must be purged, regardless of political ideology, gender, adult or child. The goal will be to do what Africa's government is doing: kicking white people out of their homes and jobs. All this isn't that they could do it, but rather they WILL be doing it if they get one their whack job leaders in a position of great power.

All of this is thanks to you, the white Leftists, that they're now going after Leftist darlings like Chelsea Clinton. A bunch of them aren't happy with Beto O'Rourke running for POTUS because they see him as too white. Biden, Pocahontas Warren, and Crazy Bernie are next, you watch. They're crazy enough to where they may think that Spartacus Booker might be too white for his own good, and any other biracial people. There have been news and magazine articles condemning the white parents of these biracial children that they don't understand the struggles of being a minority, and that they must teach those kids of the struggles and the evils of white people. They are some of the most asinine things that had ever been written and published because they also put condemnation on the minority parents for ever considering having kids with white people. But it continues and it's never reported on. These people that YOU created forget everyone is human, regardless of color and ethnicity. YOU wanted to make slaves out of them, but now you're losing YOUR control over them. So boo-freaking-hoo to you. We white non-Leftists been through this for years. Other minority non-Leftists have been through this for years, hearing about how they're betrayers of their race and how they're not down for the struggle against the white man. In reality, they didn't give in to the bull$#!t you fed these lunatic fringe activist groups. All I can say is this: it doesn't feel good to be called racist, does it? Especially when someone like Chelsea Clinton was condemning anti-Semitic remarks made by one of YOUR own. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.


Sincerly,
A white non-Leftist
 
I responded "yes" to the poll, though I think the tense is wrong: white liberals are already on the POC chopping block, and sometimes get even worse treatment than white conservatives.

Name one who's been chopped or had gotten worse treatment than conservatives because they are white and male. Link please.

But the thing is even if you could demonstrate that as some kind of movement beyond scattered anecdotes, it's saying nothing, is just lazy tripe. White conservatives are on the GOP chopping block in the Trump era, and I can prove that by pointing to 10 NeverTrumpers purged from the party!!
 
Why are white people the one group to be preserved?


Thank you for your note.

As a relatively new member, I am well aware of the strict posting rules.

So I will not be able to answer you, lest I unwittingly violate the rules.


Have a nice day!
 
Name one who's been chopped or had gotten worse treatment than conservatives because they are white and male. Link please.

But the thing is even if you could demonstrate that as some kind of movement beyond scattered anecdotes, it's saying nothing, is just lazy tripe. White conservatives are on the GOP chopping block in the Trump era, and I can prove that by pointing to 10 NeverTrumpers purged from the party!!

Note a recent CNN poll:
A CNN poll last week showed that there was “a lot of ambivalence” among Democrat voters about the possibility of nominating a straight
white male. Almost a quarter of them said a straight white male would not be a satisfactory nominee, with another 40 percent saying
they were unsure about that frightening prospect. Biden & Bernie should take notice.

Beto has already apologized for his whiteness

'White liberal democratic elites’ who championed the intrusion into this country
of the 3rd worlders who are now entering politics through the forces of demographics will eventually be tossed aside.
 
Democratic Presidential Nominee

Put your money on Harris she checks all the boxes one needs to win the nomination
of the "NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY"

501 Joe Biden is Democratic Nominee +300
503 K Harris is Democratic Nominee +330
505 B Sanders is Democratic Nominee +350
507 B O'Rourke is Democratic Nominee +475
509 A Yang is Democratic Nominee +850
511 C Booker is Democratic Nominee +1500
513 E Warren is Democratic Nominee +2200

All others are also rans over 30 to 1 or +3000

5Dimes Sportsbook, Casino, Poker, Racebook and Lotto
 
That's true, it is a shame that most liberals who flirt with Socialism aren't aware of the scurrilous history of its real-world applications.

The Scandinavian countries are socialist, as is Canada. Socialist simply means caring about citizens.
 
To white Leftists:

For the past several years, you have been talking about how we white non-Leftists have been about white supremacy and racism without evidence to back it up. Especially when it comes to white males because not only is it race baiting and racist, but also sexist. You've called us every name in the book, likening us to dictators like Hitler and Stalin, and accused us of wanting to kill people through something as simple as tax cuts or believing in a faith that you don't share. Whenever we do one thing you don't agree with, you instantly call us racist or doing something racist. You say that we are the cause of minorities going to jail whenever some one from a minority group breaks the law, even though there is no evidence on that either. When it comes to the environment, you say that it is white conservatives that are destroying it. You even say that a border wall is somehow a show of white supremacy, although it is evident that many people of all colors and ethnicity (which includes Hispanics) want this wall to be built. You go as far as if a mass shooting happens it's because of us white non-Leftists. When a white supremacist does reveal themselves, that person says they are one of you, either through statements they make publicly or through a manifesto in complete detail, but despite those facts, you still blame it on us and claim this person is one of us non-Leftists. Everything you say about us is false, and what makes it worse is most of you know this, while some of you are simply brainwashed into believing this nonsense.

But now, look what's happening. These things that YOU said about us is coming back to bite you very hard. These lunatic fringe Leftists that YOU created, that happen to be a part of these minority groups, are starting to turn on YOU. They're going to start with the big names first. That's how they get a foothold. Then they're going to start noticing that YOU either living as nice a life as, or better than what, they are. That's a big no-no to them. They will see this as white privilege, a tactic and a false trait YOU pinned on us, where somehow a white person simply has more opportunity in life or some immunity to the law because we're white and the people that founded this country were white, and they made this country for white people. That's what YOU have them believing. Eventually, what will happen is groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter (or the equivalents of those groups), Leftist groups created by YOU and YOUR leaders, they will start attacking white members because YOU have them believing that white people are demons and that all white people must be purged, regardless of political ideology, gender, adult or child. The goal will be to do what Africa's government is doing: kicking white people out of their homes and jobs. All this isn't that they could do it, but rather they WILL be doing it if they get one their whack job leaders in a position of great power.

All of this is thanks to you, the white Leftists, that they're now going after Leftist darlings like Chelsea Clinton. A bunch of them aren't happy with Beto O'Rourke running for POTUS because they see him as too white. Biden, Pocahontas Warren, and Crazy Bernie are next, you watch. They're crazy enough to where they may think that Spartacus Booker might be too white for his own good, and any other biracial people. There have been news and magazine articles condemning the white parents of these biracial children that they don't understand the struggles of being a minority, and that they must teach those kids of the struggles and the evils of white people. They are some of the most asinine things that had ever been written and published because they also put condemnation on the minority parents for ever considering having kids with white people. But it continues and it's never reported on. These people that YOU created forget everyone is human, regardless of color and ethnicity. YOU wanted to make slaves out of them, but now you're losing YOUR control over them. So boo-freaking-hoo to you. We white non-Leftists been through this for years. Other minority non-Leftists have been through this for years, hearing about how they're betrayers of their race and how they're not down for the struggle against the white man. In reality, they didn't give in to the bull$#!t you fed these lunatic fringe activist groups. All I can say is this: it doesn't feel good to be called racist, does it? Especially when someone like Chelsea Clinton was condemning anti-Semitic remarks made by one of YOUR own. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.


Sincerly,
A white non-Leftist

Which white liberal made anti-semitic remarks? Ilhan Omar is not white. At least do a little research before spouting off.

Good to see all the racists coming in for a swim in the big pool. The kiddie pool st Stormfront must be closed for cleaning or something.
 
Democratic Presidential Nominee

Put your money on Harris she checks all the boxes one needs to win the nomination
of the "NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY"

501 Joe Biden is Democratic Nominee +300
503 K Harris is Democratic Nominee +330
505 B Sanders is Democratic Nominee +350
507 B O'Rourke is Democratic Nominee +475
509 A Yang is Democratic Nominee +850
511 C Booker is Democratic Nominee +1500
513 E Warren is Democratic Nominee +2200

All others are also rans over 30 to 1 or +3000

5Dimes Sportsbook, Casino, Poker, Racebook and Lotto

You know what's funny? Back during Reconstruction, conservative Democrats tarred progressive Republicans with the epithet "Black Republican Party." Now you're doing it in reverse! History does repeat itself.
 
Last poll answer: "White silence is white violence, end whiteness, now where's my new iPhone and Nike shoes?"

What? What have Nike shoes and iPhones to do with someone's being of a "white silence is white violence, end whiteness" mindset?
 
Last edited:
Name one who's been chopped or had gotten worse treatment than conservatives because they are white and male. Link please.

But the thing is even if you could demonstrate that as some kind of movement beyond scattered anecdotes, it's saying nothing, is just lazy tripe. White conservatives are on the GOP chopping block in the Trump era, and I can prove that by pointing to 10 NeverTrumpers purged from the party!!

So you're saying first that I ought to provide anecdotal evidence, but that you're going to disbelieve it anyway. That doesn't sound like a particularly productive conversation (which is perhaps the whole point).

Here's the attitude I have toward anecdotal evidence:

If I cite specific people who protest Howard Schultz being a candidate because he's white, that doesn't necessarily taint every white liberal with that brush.

What that anecdote indicates, though, is that those specific people feel that they can make a stupid, race-based statement as long as it's against a white person, and that they will not suffer any negative blowback.

Though you've stated that you won't give it any importance, here's one dopey comment for anyone actually interested:

#HowardSchultz is a reminder of how wealthy, opinionated white guys are just like Starbucks: there’s one on every ****ing corner.

— Bette Midler (@BetteMidler) January 30, 2019
 
Last poll answer: "White silence is white violence, end whiteness, now where's my new iPhone and Nike shoes?"

What? What have Nike shoes and iPhones to do with someone's being a "white silence is white violence, end whiteness" mindset?

I don't know what the OP had in mind, but "end whiteness" has a handful of tracings on Google, like this one.
 
Note a recent CNN poll:
A CNN poll last week showed that there was “a lot of ambivalence” among Democrat voters about the possibility of nominating a straight
white male. Almost a quarter of them said a straight white male would not be a satisfactory nominee, with another 40 percent saying
they were unsure about that frightening prospect. Biden & Bernie should take notice.

Beto has already apologized for his whiteness

'White liberal democratic elites’ who championed the intrusion into this country
of the 3rd worlders who are now entering politics through the forces of demographics will eventually be tossed aside.

And in the meantime in this reality, Beto and Biden and Sanders are all polling well, with the latter two 1 and 2. So they've not actually been tossed aside.

If the fantasy that whites won't be accepted in the Democratic party brings you some happiness, that's fine with me.
 
Republican voters also voted for Feinstein in California, given our one party system now which left Republicans without an R to vote for. That is the state of things in California. In the 2016 Senate race, our two choices were Kamala Harris and Loretta Sanchez. Both were Democratic women with a minority card under their belts.

As California goes, so goes the rest of the country. This fact hasn't sunken in yet for most white libs, and their foresight is notoriously lacking, which means they won't come to this realization until it's smacking them in the forehead.

Not necessarily. While demographically Texas is next, many Latinos want Texas job market and do not want California's poop maps.
 
Actually when it comes to the current Right, the statement that most fits the times would be, "You are next on the chopping block."


POC and other minorities already know this. And, smart whites are starting to figure it out.
 
It is bound to happen. Even the dumbest person can only be duped for so long. The Liberals have always talked the big talk and done nothing to help minorities. Recently policies have been enacted that have led to more minorities than ever before being employed. These policies have led to millions of minorities being able to get off food stamp roles. Anyone really interested in seeing minorities succeed should be backing these policies. Instead, the Liberals do everything they can to sabotage these policies. They hate seeing the Black Man succeed. Socialism doesn't grow when people are prosperous. Socialism is sown on the backs of the starving masses.

Liberals have always maintained that "Good Master" relationship with minorities. They live in their segregated communities and want it to stay that way. They want the Black Man's vote but make sure he stays in his place. We saw the same thing for DACA. Trump offered a very generous DACA fix and the Liberals refused it. The reason is they want division issues not fixes. Liberals have been screaming "I am the good whitie" do what I say and I'll take care of you for decades. Some are starting to realize that during those decades, nothing has gotten better. The Liberals are only taking care of themselves.
 
So you're saying first that I ought to provide anecdotal evidence, but that you're going to disbelieve it anyway. That doesn't sound like a particularly productive conversation (which is perhaps the whole point).

Here's the attitude I have toward anecdotal evidence:

If I cite specific people who protest Howard Schultz being a candidate because he's white, that doesn't necessarily taint every white liberal with that brush.

I've never seen Schultz protested because he's white but because he's running as a serious, moderate, centrist beholden to no one $billionaire former CEO savior of the country. It's a kind of arrogant entitlement to be taken seriously, when I and many others have seen no reason to take him seriously as a political savior.

What that anecdote indicates

And anecdote requires at least one actual person out of 350 million dismissing him only because he's white. I'm sure someone has because that's how it works - we have people on here who believe most anything - but you haven't even cleared that bar with your non-anecdote. You've only cleared the 'strawman bar.'

though, is that those specific people feel that they can make a stupid, race-based statement as long as it's against a white person, and that they will not suffer any negative blowback.

That's because a rich white male like Schultz hasn't had a minute of his life inconvenienced because he's rich and white and male, nor has his professional life suffered. So there's a double standard - true enough - because there's a double standard in society. I'm one of those white males who didn't win the grand prize in the lucky sperm lottery, just a really nice payoff on a scatch off ticket - if I ever start whining about how life is unfair to me, shoot me and put me out of my misery because I've lost it and am no longer tethered to reality.

Though you've stated that you won't give it any importance, here's one dopey comment for anyone actually interested:

I thought it was a pretty funny joke. The point of it, at least the point of most such comments, is there's no particular reason to give a single damn what they guy has to say about politics or anything else not involving coffee shops. I'm just not impressed with billionaires running vanity campaigns for President, and I'm not alone, and it has next to nothing to do with his white maleness, just that being a white male CEO billionaire buys credibility for some stupid reason.
 
It is bound to happen. Even the dumbest person can only be duped for so long.

I don't know about that. Trumps rating never seem to dip much below 40%.
 
Back
Top Bottom