• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time [W:111]

Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

In an interview with an ABC affiliate, Sanchez said he kept returning to San Francisco because he knew there would be no effort to find and deport him. The city passed an ordinance in 1989 that prohibited officials from cooperating with immigration officials--meaning that San Francisco is a "sanctuary city."

Farkin Obama and his magic time machine.
Why didn't he drone strike this guy in 88?

Is there ANYTHING he will retroactively fix via time-travel-executive-order?
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

This prick in the oval office SUED Arizona over SB1070 and rewrote US immigration policy via executive order. The very least he could do is acknowledge that his policy might need a little work.

And how would that have saved that poor woman? Neither of those things have one thing to do with this case.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

Obama wasn't responsible for the Florida Stand Your Ground law either, but it certainly didn't stop him from sharing his opinion on that shooting, did it?

This woman was shot 4 days ago...in the Trayvon Martin situation, Obama waited nearly FOUR MONTHS before making a statement.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

This prick in the oval office SUED Arizona over SB1070 and rewrote US immigration policy via executive order. The very least he could do is acknowledge that his policy might need a little work.

The PRESIDENT in the oval office has been trying for several years to address US immigration policy. Unfortunately, he has been dealing with the worst Congress of all time, in terms of its ability to pass any laws (and that is objectively measurable), and thus, he has had to pursue executive orders. Those orders are ALSO now being challenged in the courts.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

This administration also doesn't care that illegal aliens are decimating Black communities across the nation. They love to point at situations involving cops, and they will go out of their way to stir up racial hatred, but when it comes to the obvious result of their insane immigration policies, 21 year old women are as important as bug splatter on the windshield - an annoyance, but easily scraped off.

Another truth in my view, blacks are upset over the immigration debacle more than anyone else, but it's been very quiet. They know that the illegals are playing on their chances for employment.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

When this policy was passed in 1989, it Wasn't George H. Bush's Fault, It wasn't Clinton's fault, it wasn't Duybya's fault. It wasn't until the current president came into office and it became his fault and his fault alone. Thanks for giving us a heads-up on the thought process of Obama haters and why they have no credibility.

Why didn't he do something about it when he knew it was a problem? He's not going to get any credit for fixing anything on the immigration front.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

Guns don't kill people, whereas Obama's policies murder.

He didn't enforce FEDERAL law. Someone died as a direct result now.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

The city of San Francisco set the Obama Administration policy on what they will and will not talk about, and they did it back in 1989??? How did they know in 1989 that Obama would be President in 2015?

That's gotta be the coolest thing I've read on here if it's true. I respectfully request a link to substantiating documents.

I'm sure Donald trump will get right on making Obama release them, just like his phony birth certificate
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

He didn't enforce FEDERAL law. Someone died as a direct result now.

Actually it seems federal law was enforced pretty well, considering the killers numerous deportations
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

Actually it seems federal law was enforced pretty well, considering the killers numerous deportations

That only means they enforced deportation, they didn't keep him out.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

That only means they enforced deportation, they didn't keep him out.

the only way to REALLY do so is a 24/7 militarized border fence around the entire periphery of the nation.
cost estimates for that would be an upfront cost of around 3 to 5T, and a yearly cost of around 1 to 2T, depending on "skill and #" of the soldiers/mercs employed..

are you on board with that level of deficit spending?
or , if you are not, what would you sell (to cover upfront), and cut (for YoY) to have at spending neutral level?
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

the only way to REALLY do so is a 24/7 militarized border fence around the entire periphery of the nation.
cost estimates for that would be an upfront cost of around 3 to 5T, and a yearly cost of around 1 to 2T, depending on "skill and #" of the soldiers/mercs employed..

are you on board with that level of deficit spending?
or , if you are not, what would you sell (to cover upfront), and cut (for YoY) to have at spending neutral level?
We certainly not if I accepted your numbers and in that context. But I don't think it's that cut and dried.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

the only way to REALLY do so is a 24/7 militarized border fence around the entire periphery of the nation.
cost estimates for that would be an upfront cost of around 3 to 5T, and a yearly cost of around 1 to 2T, depending on "skill and #" of the soldiers/mercs employed..

are you on board with that level of deficit spending?
or , if you are not, what would you sell (to cover upfront), and cut (for YoY) to have at spending neutral level?

Not only that, no administration in my lifetime has secured our border, and as long as open borders are in the interests of big business, they won't be.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

We certainly not if I accepted your numbers and in that context. But I don't think it's that cut and dried.

so, it's not REALLY that important to you.


but let's go with comment 2 of yours. it's not that cut and dried? how else would you keep out a willing-to-return deportee, other than executing them?
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

so, it's not REALLY that important to you.


but let's go with comment 2 of yours. it's not that cut and dried? how else would you keep out a willing-to-return deportee, other than executing them?
You assume he would go to any lengths to return even going to some far off part of our border, when you're not even sure that he didn't just stroll right in somehow where he did the first time.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

And how would that have saved that poor woman? Neither of those things have one thing to do with this case.

What would have saved the woman was if the guy was actually turned over to ICE like he was supposed to be. This whole concept of "It's just a little law. Let them break it all they want and we'll catch the bad ones" doesn't work.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

You assume he would go to any lengths to return even going to some far off part of our border, when you're not even sure that he didn't just stroll right in somehow where he did the first time.


you assume he or others wouldn't. YOU demand a system where the criminally deported cannot return. I give you a solution and you equivocate and balk because it costs $.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

Not only that, no administration in my lifetime has secured our border, and as long as open borders are in the interests of big business, they won't be.

Yep, I've been saying cheap immigrant labor is what businesses wants, and the very pro-business GOP is onboard 110%. But they keep throwing the red meat to their base, and their base falls for it every time.

Even when the GOP has the WH nothing gets done.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

The PRESIDENT in the oval office has been trying for several years to address US immigration policy. Unfortunately, he has been dealing with the worst Congress of all time, in terms of its ability to pass any laws (and that is objectively measurable), and thus, he has had to pursue executive orders. Those orders are ALSO now being challenged in the courts.

Sometimes life is hard. In this country the president doesn't get to do what he wants if congress disagrees. If he wants to do his own thing and make up his own laws let him be president of North Korea or something. Besides, it's policies just like what he's proposing that lead to this woman's murder. Believe it or not, that was the whole premise of this thread!
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

Yes we do. Had you only been so concerned about them then, perhaps we wouldn't have to be concerned about them now. But oh no, HELL NO, the partisan can never ever hold his own to accountability. So **** it, well just get more of the same because the vast majority of you guys, left and right alike, are freakin partisans!

Partisan because Obama has been in office for the last 7 years?
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

Yep, I've been saying cheap immigrant labor is what businesses wants, and the very pro-business GOP is onboard 110%. But they keep throwing the red meat to their base, and their base falls for it every time.

Even when the GOP has the WH nothing gets done.


which is why the TRUE AND SURE solution to illegal immigration is to make it a capital crime to employ or own a businses where anyone who hires an illegal immigrant. AND--- that extends to granny smith whose mutual fund has .00012% in company_X.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

I'm not distracting anything. San Francisco protected this person and no president in over 25 years had done anything to stop it; liberal or conservative.

So show me how Romney was involved in San Francsico's sanctuary city status. Take your time.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

Obama wasn't in office in 1989 this was 0% his fault.

Specifically about San Fran's city status, agreed. However his policies as it applies to ICE and releasing felons from jail - not correct. Obama is using prosecutorial discretion and extending that policy to the rest of government - that is absolutely his fault.
 
Re: White House: We Aren't Going to Comment on Murder of Kate Steinle By 7-Time Felon

What did Obama have to do with San Francisco becoming a sanctuary city?

The question is what did Mitt Romney have to do with San Fran's becoming a sanctuary city...
 
Back
Top Bottom