- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
News just in... the General was shot by man on the horse. GOP's main concern... what color was the horse.
Four Americans are killed, because of the president's incompetance and you ask, "who gives a ****?".
Havent seen many presidentual admins, but I wouldn't call this response unprecedented. They all shift the blame. GWB did when no WMDs were found. How many people did he end up during?
I think it's typical DC.
I'm a
Bushbot? You got a link where I defended warrantless wiretapping?
I don't think investigators should have to get a warrant to listen in on a call coming out of Iran. That part's true. I've never defended warrantless wiretapping of domestic phone calls.
For you apparently only deaths that happen while a Dem is president is something to give a **** over.
All I've seen you post are insults.
People died. Obama lied.For you apparently only deaths that happen while a Dem is president is something to give a **** over.
Woodward and Bernstein will continue to be trotted around, even perhaps in caskets one day soon, anytime there's a sniff of presidential illegality or intrigue.
For you apparently only deaths that happen while a Dem is president is something to give a **** over.
Wow, your president is proving to be Tony Soprano, and you still don't care.
Erod said:Your party agreed with Bush, then changed their tune like the spineless wimps they are. Benghazi is just typical of their clueless incompetence.
Wow, your president is proving to be Tony Soprano, and you still don't care.
Your party agreed with Bush, then changed their tune like the spineless wimps they are. Benghazi is just typical of their clueless incompetence.
They're still in the denial stage at this point - there will be anger to follow once they get over being scammed.
Bull**** hyperbole much?
Oh looky folks... another two party guy who can't see beyond the borders given to him. My party? Dems are nowhere near liberal enough. When the Dems get in line with Senator Bernie Sanders, then you can call them my party.
Johnson is a good man. I'd not mind him as prez even though on many fiscal issues I'd have problems with. Bottom line, I trust the guy. I've been a Nader guy for a loooonnnnng time.
It takes a stronger and stronger person each election to be third party in the face of the sheep so willing to ALWAYS line up with the two parties and face the snobbish down-talk about how your vote doesn't count if you don't vote like they do... such crap. Kudos man!
Bull**** hyperbole much?
Oh looky folks... another two party guy who can't see beyond the borders given to him. My party? Dems are nowhere near liberal enough. When the Dems get in line with Senator Bernie Sanders, then you can call them my party.
I can't argue with that assessment other than to say that when selecting between bad and worse, bad is always the preferred choice, particularly when you could be surprised by how good bad could be if given a chance.
The rest of us see your hypocrisy
What if it's a journalist working in Iran?
Your point is weak anyway. Why Iran only? That's not the.way laws are written or work. Iran only people, not Iraq, not Pakistan were Osama was hiding, Iran only.
More insults? Nothing new here.
That is the mentality if we expect better to get out of. There are more parties and candidates out there than just the Republicans and Democrats. Sure they are the major parties, last year each party spent a billion dollars each on their candidates run for the presidency. By contrast Johnson spent 2 million. I am not sure how much Goode spent or my parties candidate, Nigel of the reform party spent. He wasn't on the ballot in Georgia.
It is my opinion, both major parties are so hip deep in owing and rewarding their special interests, lobbyist, super pacs, huge money donors, corporations, wall street, etc for the millions they throw their way in campaign contributions and ads run on their behalf, they barely have time to think of America or the people.
If one expects a good president, then on must be willing to vote for the one whom they think is best, not the least worst candidate.
Difference is we don't idolize our founding fathers like they were gods.
For foreign calls, not domestic calls. That's little fact is conveniently left out.
Nope. Involved domestic as well. Sorry.
I admire your position. However, sometimes the ideal just isn't possible and we have to take the practical course if for no other reason than to save the country and ourselves.
Now, now. Everything to the left of center is yours. You own that political real estate, and all the crazy, the corrupt, and the sublime that come with that territory. Just because the rest of the country is to the right of you and Bernie doesn't mean you get a pass. Those of us on the right own the opposite land, and it has all the same characters and features your side has. It's just that right now the spotlight happens to be shining on your side, and it's really quite a show.Bull**** hyperbole much?
Oh looky folks... another two party guy who can't see beyond the borders given to him. My party? Dems are nowhere near liberal enough. When the Dems get in line with Senator Bernie Sanders, then you can call them my party.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?