White Americans Are Biggest Terror Threat in U.S.: Study

[DVSentinel]

Americans have killed more Americans then any other group of people.

True. But also true is the fact that "some people just need killing." The arguments are more about which Americans are being killed. Not everyone agrees on which should be killed or need killing or why. Some don't agree with victims fighting back. Nor with people having the will and the means to defend themselves. Some find it wrong that criminals are killed while committing crimes. Some blame society or inanimate objects for criminals killing criminals or innocents.

 

[Unrepresented]

I suppose if a person is stupid enough, dogmatic enough, and with an agenda slanted enough, they might agree that white people are the biggest terrorists.


Those who are intelligent enough to understand the actual meaning of terrorism is, are reasonable enough to apply the term only when it qualifies, and are not such lock-step conformists to extreme political orthodoxy that they are willing to go to any lengths necessary by way of advancing their stupid agenda -- well, ..... I can't imagine they would respond to such a notion with anything but derision.

"The groupings that fit my established narrative are the only groups I'll recognize."

 

[DVSentinel]

Well the reason it is not on the list is because the article is a) about homegrown extremism which 9/11 was not and b) it is since 9/11. That is just from reading the title.

Why is Air Travel the safest way to travel? Because it is not dangerous? No. It is the safest because those involved know that it is dangerous and conscientiously work to mitigate the dangers. Homegrown extremism may have caused more death since 9/11 because it is known that Muslim extremism is dangerous and we have taken steps to mitigate that danger. There have not been any successful attacks by homegrown groups either, only lone individuals. That is because it almost impossible to stop lone individuals who are determined to act.

 

[Gardener]

"The groupings that fit my established narrative are the only groups I'll recognize."

It has nothing to do with groups. It has to do with motives and actions.

Intelligent people realize this. Unintelligent do not.

 

[xdangerousxdave]

Not people are the biggest threat, and not even their skin color. The ideas are. Ill and crazy ideas.

 

[Unrepresented]

It has nothing to do with groups. It has to do with motives and actions.

Intelligent people realize this. Unintelligent do not.

Who assigns which motives and actions get grouped together?

 

[AmericanSpartan]

The stats say differently.

Or blow up a federal building in Oklahoma, right?

2,996 people on 9/11 proves our point.

 

[Unrepresented]

2,996 people on 9/11 proves our point.

I accept your concession that white people aren't very efficient in their attempts at domestic terrorism. They're winning at attempts though, which shows they've got heart.

 

[beerftw]

White Americans Are Biggest Terror Threat in U.S.: Study

White Americans are the biggest terror threat in the United States | GlobalPost

So the left wing "New America Foundation" creates this lie.


http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7616

Its not mass immigration and Trans National Narco Terrorism or Islamic Terrorism or China that is the biggest threat to America, no its Whites..

I wish leftist would be more honest with the Anti White views.

i could easily disporove the whole conservative terrorists more deadly meme,but you did what you do,already making rational conversation impossible.

fyi if you wanted to prove your case,you could pint out the beltway snipers were eliminaed from islamic terrorism and all terroist groups by the nsa and fbi,that would add 10 to the islamic list,unless you count the robberies and random assinations,in which they labels conservative bank robberies as terrorism,then the toll rises to 17,as the beltway snipers killed people from texas all the way to maryland.


or you could oint out through simple research how quite a few other islamic terrorist acts were excluded,but by the same criteria what they called right wing terrorism was included,but held no other groups to that standard.

try thinking it out and researching it rather than just posting blogs.

 

[beerftw]

Setting aside the list that does not include post-2001, remember that these are supposed to be instances of terrorism related crimes (and as such, an "honor killing" like your 4/15/04 example would not apply).

But, I would like to know - what source are you using for this list? I wanted to know whether your list provides links to the actual stories or whether I have to do a google search for the dates and locations and stories to find an actual link myself?

it excluded the the beltway sniper attacks,which is ten if you hold it to the level of terrorism that the nsa and fbi did,its 17 if you hold it to the level that they held conservative terrorists to.

but wait they cant be terrorists they are black,black and white killers in the name of islam cant be terrorists,only brown people aparently.

 

[AmericanSpartan]

i could easily disporove the whole conservative terrorists more deadly meme,but you did what you do,already making rational conversation impossible.

fyi if you wanted to prove your case,you could pint out the beltway snipers were eliminaed from islamic terrorism and all terroist groups by the nsa and fbi,that would add 10 to the islamic list,unless you count the robberies and random assinations,in which they labels conservative bank robberies as terrorism,then the toll rises to 17,as the beltway snipers killed people from texas all the way to maryland.


or you could oint out through simple research how quite a few other islamic terrorist acts were excluded,but by the same criteria what they called right wing terrorism was included,but held no other groups to that standard.

try thinking it out and researching it rather than just posting blogs.

So much win.

 

[AmericanSpartan]

I accept your concession that white people aren't very efficient in their attempts at domestic terrorism. They're winning at attempts though, which shows they've got heart.

So you find such lies and mental gymnastics funny?

 

[Unrepresented]

So you find such lies and mental gymnastics funny?

Citation needed for "lies."

 

[AmericanSpartan]

Citation needed for "lies."

You do not count the Belt Way Snipers nor do you Count 9/11 for Islamic terrorist and use selective titles to come to a pre determinate outcomes.

 

[TurtleDude]

Americans have killed more Americans then any other group of people.

true, the Civil war cost us more lives than any other.

 

[Unrepresented]

You do not count the Belt Way Snipers nor do you Count 9/11 for Islamic terrorist and use selective titles to come to a pre determinate outcomes.

You're not suggesting that racialism and the "facts" that support it are inherently fraught with subjective boundaries, and serve narratives rather than reality, are you?

 

[AmericanSpartan]

You're not suggesting that racialism and the "facts" that support it are inherently fraught with subjective boundaries, and serve narratives rather than reality, are you?

Changing the subject it is what you are best it.

 

[Unrepresented]

Changing the subject it is what you are best it.

I'd argue that I just nailed a summary of this thread (and the majority of your posting history) in that last post.

 

[ReverendHellh0und]

it excluded the the beltway sniper attacks,which is ten if you hold it to the level of terrorism that the nsa and fbi did,its 17 if you hold it to the level that they held conservative terrorists to.

but wait they cant be terrorists they are black,black and white killers in the name of islam cant be terrorists,only brown people aparently.

It excluded over 70 attacks, and 3000 or so victims of islamic "terrorism".

 

[Thoreau72]

White Americans Are Biggest Terror Threat in U.S.: Study

White Americans are the biggest terror threat in the United States | GlobalPost

So the left wing "New America Foundation" creates this lie.


http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7616

Its not mass immigration and Trans National Narco Terrorism or Islamic Terrorism or China that is the biggest threat to America, no its Whites..

I wish leftist would be more honest with the Anti White views.

Perhaps you're reading a bit too much into the story?

It seems like simply a statistical analysis. If one analyzes the statistics regarding attacks that HAVE ALREADY OCCURRED, it turns out that white Christian radicals have had a larger role in those attacks than dark-skinned muslims.

 

[beerftw]

It excluded over 70 attacks, and 3000 or so victims of islamic "terrorism".

fyi the list is post 9/11 not pre 9/11,i have not seen a 3000 number for post 9/11 attacks.

but yes the number of attacks even post 9/11 for the study seriously scrubbed the list for islamic terrorist attacks,including numerous ones with only one or 2 victims,yet put in attacks labeled as far right,one of them even showing no terrorist motivation at all,but was labeled as a terror attack due to being afilliated with a white supremecist group.

2 of the other ones labeled as far right terrorism were actually liberals,their justification for classifying them that was that they were anti govt,however anarchists socialists facists etc can all be anti govt,especially if they are anti of a specific type of govt.further outside those 2 being anti govt,held almost entirely liberal views.

 

[ReverendHellh0und]

fyi the list is post 9/11 not pre 9/11,i have not seen a 3000 number for post 9/11 attacks.

My list was post 911. Using the same standard that the "study" used, (including a domestic violence murder that had a copy of the turner diaries in the house somewhere) you can easilly come up with 3000 islamic attacks since after, post 911.

but yes the number of attacks even post 9/11 for the study seriously scrubbed the list for islamic terrorist attacks,including numerous ones with only one or 2 victims,yet put in attacks labeled as far right,one of them even showing no terrorist motivation at all,but was labeled as a terror attack due to being afilliated with a white supremecist group.

2 of the other ones labeled as far right terrorism were actually liberals,their justification for classifying them that was that they were anti govt,however anarchists socialists facists etc can all be anti govt,especially if they are anti of a specific type of govt.further outside those 2 being anti govt,held almost entirely liberal views.

agreed. See my list, it does the same thing, it came out to about 3000 in 75 "attacks" post 911.

 

[MrT]

it excluded the the beltway sniper attacks,which is ten if you hold it to the level of terrorism that the nsa and fbi did,its 17 if you hold it to the level that they held conservative terrorists to.

but wait they cant be terrorists they are black,black and white killers in the name of islam cant be terrorists,only brown people aparently.

This website also did not list Sandy Hook or the Aurora Colorado Theatre even though they were white guys perpetrating terroristic-styled attacks. The point is that they applied a pretty narrow definition of ideologically motivated attacks, and they chose to exclude the Beltway snipers because the theories and stated motives in that case, which included jihad, also included an attempt by the main sniper to mask the murder of his ex-wife and the matrix.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_sniper_attacks#Motive

 

[ReverendHellh0und]

This website also did not list Sandy Hook or the Aurora Colorado Theatre even though they were white guys perpetrating terroristic-styled attacks. The point is that they applied a pretty narrow definition of ideologically motivated attacks, and they chose to exclude the Beltway snipers because the theories and stated motives in that case, which included jihad, also included an attempt by the main sniper to mask the murder of his ex-wife and the matrix.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_sniper_attacks#Motive

They couldn't attach a flimsy connection to the right, so they were left off, my list of 3000 dead in 75 attacks since 911, shows how ****ing stupid that "study" is.

 

[MrT]

It excluded over 70 attacks, and 3000 or so victims of islamic "terrorism".

I still don't believe that you posted your source.