alphamale
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2005
- Messages
- 1,120
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Southern California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Should Malcolm X have been honored with a U.S. postage stamp?

Well in that case he gets my vote!:2razz:Deegan said:I said no, but I do think he made some serious changes at the end of his life, but he divided blacks and whites, not brought them together.
Yet another disturbed post from our resident village idiot. What is it in your psyche that makes you so divisive and causes you to take such glee in being a reject of society? Do you not realize that your very presence on this earth disturbs humanity and creates a blight on our collective consciousness?Aryan Imperium said:Well in that case he gets my vote!:2razz:
you do realize you're playing right into the palm of his hand ?jallman said:Yet another disturbed post from our resident village idiot. What is it in your psyche that makes you so divisive and causes you to take such glee in being a reject of society? Do you not realize that your very presence on this earth disturbs humanity and creates a blight on our collective consciousness?
bah, demoralizing and smacking on nazis is just a past time when I am waiting for a more serious post to come along. It is always a pleasure to take a pot shot at pig boy and let him know where he stands. I mean, for the most part, I love that guy...he is almost cartoonish...every time I read his posts I just picture some fat, balding, greasy bellied guy in a splooge stained leiderhosen, sniffing eva braun's panties and jerking off to young nazi boy porn on the internet between posts. Is it my imagination...or some kind of clairvoyance? I havent decided yet. :2wave:128shot said:you do realize you're playing right into the palm of his hand ?
I couldnt agree with you more. Honoring any type of racism, be it from a Klansman, a Black Panther, or a disgusting pig boy Nazi is not the American ideal we should be presenting.jamesrage said:I think putting Malcolm X on a stamp would be the equavilant to putting David Duke on a stamp.
The difference between the two is Malcolm X changed profoundly after he saw what his religion was supposed to mean. The Nation of Islam in this country filled their follower's heads with the propaganda that they wanted them to believe. The followers thought their organization's leader was infallible, angelic, they almost worshipped him. This happens to people in all religions-remember the Jim Jones thing? Look at Benny Hinn, some think a wave of his coat cures cancer. He sells snake oil.jamesrage said:I think putting Malcolm X on a stamp would be the equavilant to putting David Duke on a stamp.
More than likely Malcolm X would be honored for racism not for his change of heart.While Martin Luther King Jr. was trying to bring the races together,Malcolm X busy trying to keep the races seperated.The difference between the two is Malcolm X changed profoundly after he saw what his religion was supposed to mean. The Nation of Islam in this country filled their follower's heads with the propaganda that they wanted them to believe.
A postage stamp in his honor, just because at the end he lost his racism. Pretty low standards for honoring someone. Malcom X spent his whole life saying the most vile things imaginable against whites. When an airliner crashed in california in 1962, he said "125 whites dying is a beautiful thing". During WWII, he wasn't drafted because of his previous criminal record. Instead, he spent WWII robbing the houses of servicemen who were overseas fighting. He'd probably get a huge laugh over the stamp. No ifs, the stamp is a total outrage.Anyway, because Malcolm broke from the NOI, and stopped hating Whitey so much, the NOI killed him.
White people robbed houses during WWII also. He went to prison for the crimes. Then, in prison, he tried to better himself, and he kept trying for the rest of his life.alphamale said:A postage stamp in his honor, just because at the end he lost his racism. Pretty low standards for honoring someone. Malcom X spent his whole life saying the most vile things imaginable against whites. When an airliner crashed in california in 1962, he said "125 whites dying is a beautiful thing". During WWII, he wasn't drafted because of his previous criminal record. Instead, he spent WWII robbing the houses of servicemen who were overseas fighting. He'd probably get a huge laugh over the stamp. No ifs, the stamp is a total outrage.
Your logic is full of ****.Those 125 people have nothing to do with Malcolm X.The crimes of others does not entitle you to rob a perfect stranger.A racist would buy your argument,the blame a whole race for the crimes of a few individuals seems typical of a racist.Picture yourself growing up in a country controlled by black people. You're growing up in a time when they are in charge, they own everything, you can't drink water at their fountains, can't eat at their nice restaurants. Your mother is raped by a black man, but the police won't arrest him. They tell you to simmer down, or they're going to arrest you. Black people everywhere, making the law, you just want fairness, an equal chance, some justice. What do you do, boy, just shut your mouth and take it? You hear a plane crashed and 125 of them 'darkies' just died. Don't you secretly enjoy it?
You brought the 125 up. My point is that if you were the person in my story, you would have said what he did long ago, about the 125 dying, "Good riddance." And I'm saying black people and white people robbed white people's houses during WWII, and for that matter, any other time. None of them were entitled. They were thieves.jamesrage said:Your logic is full of ****.Those 125 people have nothing to do with Malcolm X.The crimes of others does not entitle you to rob a perfect stranger.A racist would buy your argument,the blame a whole race for the crimes of a few individuals seems typical of a racist.
Malcolm X was a racist.You brought the 125 up. My point is that if you were the person in my story,
He was one of those racist who blamed a whole entire race for the actions of a few.Malcolm X was a racist, as many blacks, and many whites, were at that time. I made up the example above because you stated that he said the most vile things imaginable about white people. Why wouldn't he?
I guess that explains your insite into a mind of a racist.When I was younger I said some of the most vile things about black people imaginable.
Perhaps you are right.Then at some point I realized how stupid that mindset was. So I changed it. He did too. If he hadn't been killed, he might still be preaching the right way.
And for that he deserve's a postage stamp? Where's the bucket - I have to puke.He went to prison for the crimes. Then, in prison, he tried to better himself, and he kept trying for the rest of his life.
Distortion of history is NOT trivial - that's why liberals do it all the time.teacher said:You make a lot of people happy by putting him on a stamp. You white people can do more good for race relations by not sweating this trivial bullshit.
Right as usual, Mr. Hannity. And I sure enjoy your 3 hour commercial for the GOP on the radio every day.alphamale said:Distortion of history is NOT trivial - that's why liberals do it all the time.
Don't be a hypocrite.Distortion of history is NOT trivial - that's why liberals do it all the time.
Let's see, one, two, three, four...Scarecrow Akhbar said:Malcom the Tenth on a stamp? How totally absurd. Who's next, Robert Byrd in his Grand Dragon of the Klan Uniform?
If the purpose is to honor terrorists and racists, I do suppose it's appropriate to put Malcom Little on a stamp. No one can name anything useful he did, though.
If the purpose is to sell stamps, I'm sure there's lots of Flavor-Aid drinkers that's buy it.
But, if honoring thugs is the goal, may I recommend Rodney King, OJ Simpson, and Calypso Louis Farrakhan to follow?
He fought very hard to separate blacks from whites, we all now know that was not a good idea, for either race. He may have reached some folks, the rational, intelligent folks, but the ignorant, he sent those people back a hundred years.......or who was that you compared him to, Columbus, yeah, he probably set them back at least that far. Not a good comparison my friend, much different times, that kind of violence was still considered acceptable, and Columbus discovered America, that's all he should be remembered for, and some even doubt that!galenrox said:Dude, that's one way to percieve things, but you could also say he strengthened them, mostly both.
He was a real hateful dude for most of his life, but I mean, christ, I'm sure we have a Christopher Columbus stamp, and there is NO WAY Malcom X was more hate filled than Columbus
jamesrage said:I think putting Malcolm X on a stamp would be the equavilant to putting David Duke on a stamp.
Think about it. There were twenty white people, maybe more, per black, instilling hatred publicly at that time. We didn't outnumber blacks by that much, but most of them were not as bold as the Malcolm X types, afraid they might be put in jail.Deegan said:He was a useful figure in those days, someone needed to stand up, but the hatred he instilled, that is so very prevalent, even today. His message was lost in anger, and the violence that preceded it, he could have been worthy of a stamp, but he took a wrong turn.