• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Where do you stand?

ChesterCat

Banned
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
As they look over the world's painful panorama of war and terror, some people conclude that it is too late, that no amount of information or activity could possibly kick butt and take names. But those who take that pessimistic view understand neither The Democratic Party nor its current rung on the ladder to total power. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: If natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species then The Democratic Party is clearly going to be the first to go. The Democratic Party's worshippers are not only resentful recidivists but are also the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of our nation. I explained the reason for that just a moment ago. If you don't mind, though, I'll go ahead and explain it again. To begin with, if you're like most people you just shrug your shoulders whenever you hear about its latest ipse dixits. When your shoulders get tired of shrugging I hope you'll realize that The Democratic Party claims that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in its squibs. Then again, I recently heard a famous celebrity—I forgot which one—say, "No value, no belief, and no personal need or desire can be placed higher than the aspiration to expose false prophets who preach that black is white and night is day." That's such a great quote, I wish I had been the one who thought of it. Sadly, the cleverest thing I ever said was that if The Democratic Party is victorious in its quest to keep us perennially behind the eight ball, then its crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity.

Should this be discussed in school? You bet. That's the function of education: To teach students how to unveil the semiotic patterns that The Democratic Party utilizes to destroy our culture, our institutions, and our way of life. Needless to say, an injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere. Keep that in mind the next time you catch The Democratic Party setting up dissident groups and individuals for conspiracy charges and then carrying out searches and seizures on flimsy pretexts. The Democratic Party fully intends to abandon me on a desert island. But that's not enough, not for it. The Democratic Party will additionally gag the innocent accused from protesting statism-motivated prosecutions, which is why I aver that it wants to keep us hypnotized so we don't ring the bells of truth. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.

Let's play a little game. Deduct one point from your I.Q. if you fell for The Democratic Party's ridiculous claim that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. Deduct another point if you failed to notice that The Democratic Party's confreres assert that The Democratic Party can achieve its goals by friendly and moral conduct. This is precisely the non-equation that The Democratic Party is trying to patch together. What it's missing, as usual, is that it has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that it's churlish for it to divert our attention from serious issues. Or perhaps I should say, it's tactless. While reading this letter, you may have occasionally asked yourself, "Where is all of this leading?" and, "What is the point exactly?" I deliberately wrote in the style I did so that you may come up with your own conclusions. Therefore, I leave you with only the following: The Democratic Party has a driving need to inaugurate an era of ugly immoralism.
 
Maybe I can explain. What part doesn't make sense?

anything that points out the failure of liberalism does not make sense to liberals, the defective liberal gene will not allow it.
 
ChesterCat said:
The Democratic Party fully intends to abandon me on a desert island.
And who could blame them?
 
And who could blame them?

soccer-goal.jpg
 
Thank god we have the repugnantcan party whose sole concern is our health and welfare and to protect us from them there evil democraps.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Moved, not about the election.
 
It appears to me that someone tinkled a little radical in your cornflakes. I definitely wouldn't call the Dems immoral. Without balls, yes, immoral, no.
 
As they look over the world's painful panorama of war and terror, some people conclude that it is too late, that no amount of information or activity could possibly kick butt and take names. But those who take that pessimistic view understand neither The Democratic Party nor its current rung on the ladder to total power. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: If natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species then The Democratic Party is clearly going to be the first to go. The Democratic Party's worshippers are not only resentful recidivists but are also the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of our nation. I explained the reason for that just a moment ago. If you don't mind, though, I'll go ahead and explain it again. To begin with, if you're like most people you just shrug your shoulders whenever you hear about its latest ipse dixits. When your shoulders get tired of shrugging I hope you'll realize that The Democratic Party claims that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in its squibs. Then again, I recently heard a famous celebrity—I forgot which one—say, "No value, no belief, and no personal need or desire can be placed higher than the aspiration to expose false prophets who preach that black is white and night is day." That's such a great quote, I wish I had been the one who thought of it. Sadly, the cleverest thing I ever said was that if The Democratic Party is victorious in its quest to keep us perennially behind the eight ball, then its crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity.

Should this be discussed in school? You bet. That's the function of education: To teach students how to unveil the semiotic patterns that The Democratic Party utilizes to destroy our culture, our institutions, and our way of life. Needless to say, an injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere. Keep that in mind the next time you catch The Democratic Party setting up dissident groups and individuals for conspiracy charges and then carrying out searches and seizures on flimsy pretexts. The Democratic Party fully intends to abandon me on a desert island. But that's not enough, not for it. The Democratic Party will additionally gag the innocent accused from protesting statism-motivated prosecutions, which is why I aver that it wants to keep us hypnotized so we don't ring the bells of truth. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.

Let's play a little game. Deduct one point from your I.Q. if you fell for The Democratic Party's ridiculous claim that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. Deduct another point if you failed to notice that The Democratic Party's confreres assert that The Democratic Party can achieve its goals by friendly and moral conduct. This is precisely the non-equation that The Democratic Party is trying to patch together. What it's missing, as usual, is that it has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that it's churlish for it to divert our attention from serious issues. Or perhaps I should say, it's tactless. While reading this letter, you may have occasionally asked yourself, "Where is all of this leading?" and, "What is the point exactly?" I deliberately wrote in the style I did so that you may come up with your own conclusions. Therefore, I leave you with only the following: The Democratic Party has a driving need to inaugurate an era of ugly immoralism.

Besides telling you that I really hate "wall of text" style of posts, I really have only one other thing for you:

Don't count the Democrats out.
 
A bit dense intellectually?

Nah dude, I just have this problem where I live in reality.

And in reality the Original Post is very much not based in reality.

Not to mention being extremely poorly written (or typed for those keeping score).
 
Should this be discussed in school? You bet. That's the function of education: To teach students how to unveil the semiotic patterns that The Democratic Party utilizes to destroy our culture, our institutions, and our way of life.

A nugget of Minnesota politics: liberals genuinely believe that the government can help people and make their lives better. Conservatives genuinely believe that only the individual can improve their own prospects and that government regulation inevitably detracts from that individual's quality of life. Neither viewpoint is fully accurate or inaccurate, and most of us will go back and forth, in between, as our perspective evolves.

That's what good political discourse comes down to. The bad discourse is when people become so distanced from objective reality that they forget what they want to achieve and start hating the other side more than they love anything. The fastest way for a free nation to destroy itself is to divide itself, so if you want to stop the "destruction" of America, feel free to start with the reflection in the mirror.
 
As they look over the world's painful panorama of war and terror, some people conclude that it is too late, that no amount of information or activity could possibly kick butt and take names. But those who take that pessimistic view understand neither The Democratic Party nor its current rung on the ladder to total power. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: If natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species then The Democratic Party is clearly going to be the first to go. The Democratic Party's worshippers are not only resentful recidivists but are also the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of our nation. I explained the reason for that just a moment ago. If you don't mind, though, I'll go ahead and explain it again. To begin with, if you're like most people you just shrug your shoulders whenever you hear about its latest ipse dixits. When your shoulders get tired of shrugging I hope you'll realize that The Democratic Party claims that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in its squibs. Then again, I recently heard a famous celebrity—I forgot which one—say, "No value, no belief, and no personal need or desire can be placed higher than the aspiration to expose false prophets who preach that black is white and night is day." That's such a great quote, I wish I had been the one who thought of it. Sadly, the cleverest thing I ever said was that if The Democratic Party is victorious in its quest to keep us perennially behind the eight ball, then its crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity.

Should this be discussed in school? You bet. That's the function of education: To teach students how to unveil the semiotic patterns that The Democratic Party utilizes to destroy our culture, our institutions, and our way of life. Needless to say, an injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere. Keep that in mind the next time you catch The Democratic Party setting up dissident groups and individuals for conspiracy charges and then carrying out searches and seizures on flimsy pretexts. The Democratic Party fully intends to abandon me on a desert island. But that's not enough, not for it. The Democratic Party will additionally gag the innocent accused from protesting statism-motivated prosecutions, which is why I aver that it wants to keep us hypnotized so we don't ring the bells of truth. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.

Let's play a little game. Deduct one point from your I.Q. if you fell for The Democratic Party's ridiculous claim that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. Deduct another point if you failed to notice that The Democratic Party's confreres assert that The Democratic Party can achieve its goals by friendly and moral conduct. This is precisely the non-equation that The Democratic Party is trying to patch together. What it's missing, as usual, is that it has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that it's churlish for it to divert our attention from serious issues. Or perhaps I should say, it's tactless. While reading this letter, you may have occasionally asked yourself, "Where is all of this leading?" and, "What is the point exactly?" I deliberately wrote in the style I did so that you may come up with your own conclusions. Therefore, I leave you with only the following: The Democratic Party has a driving need to inaugurate an era of ugly immoralism.

So work hard to get Romney elected then. And then there will be no healthcare, vouchers for medicare, no cancer screening for women, no regulations on banks and big business, more tax breaks for the wealthy, more outsourcing of jobs. I could go on but I think I'll stop there. The Republican Party has a driving need to take us back to an ugly era privatising our country.
 
anything that points out the failure of liberalism does not make sense to liberals, the defective liberal gene will not allow it.

Liberal gene? What the ****?
 
Back
Top Bottom