So America's Lawyer (HA!) Rudy Giuliani said Trump's threat to Michael Cohen's father-in-law was not obstruction of justice. Obstruction of justice is defined: an act that "corruptly or by threat or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."
No one can argue Trump was trying to influence Cohen's potential testimony to Congress with this threat. This alone should be bringing about impeachment.
So America's Lawyer (HA!) Rudy Giuliani said Trump's threat to Michael Cohen's father-in-law was not obstruction of justice. Obstruction of justice is defined: an act that "corruptly or by threat or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."
No one can argue Trump was trying to influence Cohen's potential testimony to Congress with this threat. This alone should be bringing about impeachment.
Where did you come up with the above ....wait... a debunk Buzzfeed story?:lamo CNN or MSNBC fell all over themselves for this debunk story and you seem to be caught hook line and sinker?
Trump's tweet said to "watch Cohen's father in law', insinuating he is guilty of crimes himself. It was not a threat of any kind. It did not imply a threat. It was a heads up to the father in laws activities. That it is a threat is just more fake news. Trump lives in your heads. Get therapy.
Trump's tweet said to "watch Cohen's father in law', insinuating he is guilty of crimes himself. It was not a threat of any kind. It did not imply a threat. It was a heads up to the father in laws activities. That it is a threat is just more fake news. Trump lives in your heads. Get therapy.
Has to be a crime before there is obstruction.
So America's Lawyer (HA!) Rudy Giuliani said Trump's threat to Michael Cohen's father-in-law was not obstruction of justice. Obstruction of justice is defined: an act that "corruptly or by threat or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."
No one can argue Trump was trying to influence Cohen's potential testimony to Congress with this threat. This alone should be bringing about impeachment.
What are democrats going to do when the Mueller investigation finds no "collusion nor obstruction" by the President? Already the democrats in the house are planning to reopen the collusion investigation into Trump after the initial investigation in the house and the senate found nothing. BTW, collusion is not a crime. It's about keeping the illusion of a problem so they can win the white house in 2020. It's obstruction for trump to legally fire Comey, but it's not a crime for Hillary to destroy evidence under subpoena?
So if trump saying "watch cohen's father in law" was a heads up to the father in laws activities, which you and trump are both insinuating are illegal with that comment, you sound like you are convicting his father in law with no evidence. No?
Awfully unbecoming of a president to make public accusations of criminal activities, especially when those accusations can influence witness testimony against you. Not just unbecoming, but criminal.
Trump's tweet said to "watch Cohen's father in law', insinuating he is guilty of crimes himself. It was not a threat of any kind. It did not imply a threat. It was a heads up to the father in laws activities. That it is a threat is just more fake news. Trump lives in your heads. Get therapy.
It's not criminal to recommend something be looked into.
So America's Lawyer (HA!) Rudy Giuliani said Trump's threat to Michael Cohen's father-in-law was not obstruction of justice. Obstruction of justice is defined: an act that "corruptly or by threat or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."
No one can argue Trump was trying to influence Cohen's potential testimony to Congress with this threat. This alone should be bringing about impeachment.
Where did you come up with the above ....wait... a debunk Buzzfeed story?:lamo CNN or MSNBC fell all over themselves for this debunk story and you seem to be caught hook line and sinker?
Trump's tweet said to "watch Cohen's father in law', insinuating he is guilty of crimes himself. It was not a threat of any kind. It did not imply a threat. It was a heads up to the father in laws activities. That it is a threat is just more fake news. Trump lives in your heads. Get therapy.
I am sure when the mobster says he’d hate to see something bad happen to your small business you think he is speaking out of sincere concern. You guys are a riot.
Trump is the President of the United States. This board is called "Debate Politics". Are you suggesting that posters post on here and not post about the President of the United States, who just happens to be the most powerful person in this country politically?
Please don't say dumb things. It makes you look ridiculous.
Maybe a board called "Debate The Bachelor" would be more to your liking.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?